0001 1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 2 CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 5 Petition of Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., (Adamar) 6 for renewal of its casino license and other matters 7 (PRN 2140705, 2910706, 2910708) 8 Volume 7 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 11 Tuesday, December 4, 2007 12 Atlantic City Commission Offices 13 Joseph P. Lordi Public Meeting Room - First Floor 14 Tennessee Avenue and Boardwalk 15 Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401 16 1:30 a.m. to 2:40 p.m. 17 18 19 Certified Court Reporter: Darlene Sillitoe 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 ATLANTIC CITY COURT REPORTING, LLC 22 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS AND VIDEOGRAPHERS 23 1125 ATLANTIC AVENUE, SUITE 416 24 ATLANTIC CITY, NEW JERSEY 08401 25 (609) 345-8448 www.accourtreporting.com 0002 1 B E F O R E : 2 CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION: LINDA M. KASSEKERT, CHAIR 3 MICHAEL A. FEDORKO, VICE CHAIR MICHAEL C. EPPS, COMMISSIONER 4 RALPH G. FRULIO, COMMISSIONER WILLIAM T. SOMMELING, COMMISSIONER 5 PRESENT FOR THE CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION: 6 DARYL W. NANCE, ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST DANIEL J. HENEGHAN, PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER 7 OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL: 8 DIANNA W. FAUNTLEROY, GENERAL COUNSEL/EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 9 LEONARD J. DIGIACOMO, ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL STEVEN M. INGIS, ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL 10 11 12 A P P E A R A N C E S : 13 DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT: 14 YVONNE G. MAHER, ACTING DIRECTOR MARYJO FLAHERTY, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL 15 16 STERNS & WEINROTH, PC BY: PAUL M. O'GARA, ESQ: 17 FOR: TROPICANA ENTITIES 18 CLEARY & JOSEM, LLP BY: REGINA C. HERTZIG, ESQ. 19 FOR: UNITE-HERE, LOCAL 55 20 21 22 23 24 25 0003 1 E X H I B I T S : 2 Division No. Description EVD 3 D-68 Division of Gaming Enforcement's X Proposed Conditions 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0004 1 (The Special Meeting was commenced at 2 1:30 p.m.) 3 MR. NANCE: Good morning. 4 This is to advise the general public 5 that in compliance with Chapter 231 of the 6 Public Laws of 1975 entitled the "Open Public 7 Meetings Act," the New Jersey Casino Control 8 Commission on November 29th, 2007, filed with 9 the Secretary of State at the State House, 10 Trenton, New Jersey, a notice of this hearing, 11 and on November 29th, 2007, copies were mailed 12 to subscribers. 13 Members of the press will be permitted 14 to take photographs and we would ask that this 15 be done in a manner which is not disruptive or 16 distracting to the Commission and which does 17 not interfere with the public's right to 18 observe the hearing. 19 The use of cellular telephones in the 20 public meeting room while the Commission is in 21 session is prohibited. 22 Would everyone please stand for the 23 Pledge of Allegiance. 24 (The flag salute was recited.) 25 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Good afternoon. 0005 1 MR. NANCE: Good afternoon. 2 CHAIR KASSEKERT: We are here today on 3 the matter of the relicensing of the Tropicana 4 Hotel and Casino to hear closing arguments from 5 various parties. 6 Let me first ask if there are any 7 procedural matters that need to be brought to 8 our attention? 9 MS. FLAHERTY: Yes, Chair. There were 10 three pages of Mr. Lyons' sworn interview which 11 is in evidence that need to be incorporated 12 into that document, pages 28, 35 and 41, and we 13 would ask that that be allowed. 14 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. 15 Any objection? 16 MR. O'GARA: None. 17 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Okay. Seeing none, we 18 will move that in with that exhibit. 19 In addition, there are two separate 20 sealing requests that need to be resolved. 21 First, the Tropicana requests the sealing of 22 A-12, 13, 18, 28, 48, 49, 51, 56, 57, 58, and 23 59. These 11 exhibits contain information 24 regarding staffing levels both in general and, 25 more specifically, with respect to the security 0006 1 department. In review of the issues already to 2 be decided at this hearing and considering the 3 testimony already given, I do not believe that 4 sealing is appropriate for those documents. 5 The second sealing request pertains to 6 information about Jeffrey Silver's compensation 7 from the Tropicana in his capacity as the sole 8 member of the independent audit committee at 9 the holding company level. The relevant 10 exhibits here are A-82 and A-84 and D-62 and 11 D-64. Obviously, Mr. Silver's ability to 12 comply with the tests of independence is 13 another issue to be decided. Accordingly, some 14 of the monetary figures that have been proposed 15 for redaction should not be sealed in the 16 context of this proceeding. 17 However, I believe that the proposed 18 redactions on Page 5 of D-64 at lines 8 and 9 19 should be sealed insofar as they relate to Mr. 20 Silver's overall compensation from other 21 sources other than Tropicana. For these 22 reasons, I move to deny that these sealing 23 applications except for those limited matters 24 in D-64. 25 We will now start closing arguments. As 0007 1 a result of our meeting -- 2 MR. INGIS: Madame Chair -- 3 MR. DiGIACOMO: Madame Chair? You need 4 a motion. 5 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Oh, I need a motion. 6 I so move. Is there a second? 7 VICE CHAIR FEDORKO: Second. 8 COMMISSIONER SOMMELING: Second. 9 CHAIR KASSEKERT: The motion has been 10 made and seconded. All in favor? 11 (Ayes.) 12 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Opposed? 13 (No response.) 14 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Motion carries. 15 A couple of weeks ago we made a 16 determination that Local 54 would be allowed to 17 participate in this proceeding by making a 18 closing statement. We will start with their 19 representative. 20 And, ma'am, would you please state your 21 name for the record? 22 MS. HERTZIG: Sure. 23 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Because I've forgotten 24 it. 25 MS. HERTZIG: Regina Hertzig, Cleary & 0008 1 Josem on behalf of Local 54. 2 Commissioners, I think the most telling 3 statement came at the beginning of the hearing, 4 before to any testimony was taken, and that was 5 when Commissioner Frulio asked Mr. O'Gara about 6 Tropicana's decision to reduce the number of 7 locksmiths to one when there are over 2,000 8 rooms in the casino. And Mr. O'Gara's response 9 was a very flip, "There's no law against 10 suicide." And I submit to you today that 11 that's what this case is all about. There is a 12 law against taking down all of the employees of 13 Tropicana. If Tropicana itself wants to commit 14 suicide, so be it. But when it's going to take 15 down all of its employees with it and the 16 reputation of the city of Atlantic City, I 17 believe that the Commission has a 18 responsibility to enforce the Casino Control 19 Act, and there certainly is a law in place to 20 do that. 21 Holding one of New Jersey's limited 22 casino licenses, gaming licenses, is a 23 privilege. And the performance of Adamar and 24 its owner, William Yung, here in Atlantic City 25 unquestionably demonstrates that they should 0009 1 not be granted that privilege. 2 The Division of Gaming Enforcement 3 presented evidence that the application has 4 disregarded its statutory and regulatory 5 obligations on multiple occasions over the last 6 11 months. As UNITE HERE Local 54 7 representative, I will address those areas of 8 particular concern not only to Local 54's 9 members but to all Atlantic City residents 10 whose livelihoods depend on the continued high 11 quality casino tourism that this city brings. 12 The steep decline in cleanliness and the 13 service standards of the Tropicana that have 14 occurred within the few months that the 15 Applicant took over its operations in January 16 2007 demonstrate that the license is 17 inappropriate. 18 This decline in cleanliness should be a 19 matter for the Commission for three reasons. 20 First, the Atlantic City casino control hotel 21 industry is built on customer service. The 22 statute specifically says it should be a 23 first-class facility of exceptional quality. A 24 filthy and unsanitary facility that prompts a 25 flood of complaints from regular customers 0010 1 cannot be considered a superior first-class 2 facility. 3 Second, the Applicant has not 4 demonstrated that it intends to change how it 5 operates in the future. William Yung asked the 6 Commission to swallow the incredible 7 proposition that the mass layoffs of hundreds 8 of employees, 900 net, at the Tropicana 9 Atlantic City, has no effect on the quality of 10 customer service. In fact, he told the 11 Commission, "The service level at Tropicana is 12 vastly superior and the cleanliness is much 13 better than when we took it over." 14 Third, the Applicant's witnesses were 15 not candid with the Commission, attempting to 16 hide facts and casting blames on employees and 17 unions instead of taking responsibility for 18 management's decisions. The Tropicana did not 19 meet its burden of proving Tropicana is a 20 first-class facility. It bears the burden of 21 proof by clear and convincing evidence that the 22 license should be renewed and that it maintains 23 the level of quality required under the 24 statute. 25 In its report, the Division of Gaming 0011 1 Enforcement called into question whether the 2 Tropicana had maintained a first-class resort 3 during the past 11 months. There were many 4 ways they could have demonstrated this. They 5 didn't introduce any photographs or video 6 footage of the facility, did not call any 7 employees to testify about the environment in 8 which they work on a daily basis, and did not 9 introduce inspection reports from local 10 government agencies that inspect its 11 restaurants and hotel rooms. It did not 12 present any favorable reports from customers 13 praising its cleanliness or quality of customer 14 service. 15 We submit that by failing to present 16 affirmative evidence showing that it is clean 17 and superior service it is providing to 18 Atlantic City guests they have not met its 19 obligations under the statute. 20 We submit, and we'd like to you take 21 special attention to, D-11, which is the number 22 of customer complaints that took place that 23 were submitted between March '07 and August 24 '07. I'm not going to read them here today, 25 but we'd like you to take particular note of 0012 1 those. They were only the ones that were 2 submitted by -- into the player development 3 department. Granted, there probably are other 4 customer complaints, and they admitted that it 5 was only from the player development department 6 that these complaints that are comprised of in 7 D-11 that are part of the record in this matter 8 deal with a number of complaints regarding 9 cleanliness of the restrooms. 10 And this is particularly noteworthy 11 because William Yung testified that cleanliness 12 was only a problem for three weeks. Yet you 13 have these serious complaints that stretch from 14 March to August. And those are in the record, 15 and we ask you to please take particular note 16 of those. 17 The Applicant responded to those 18 complaints by saying the number is minuscule in 19 comparison with the number of rooms at the 20 Tropicana. This testimony itself was 21 deceptive. On the last day of hearing, Mr. 22 Giannantonio admitted the complaints produced 23 at DGE are not the only customer complaints, 24 and the customer complaints that are not tied 25 to the player development department were not 0013 1 even submitted. 2 The Tropicana blamed Local 54 for its 3 cleanliness problems. They testified that 4 there was a sick-out. However, there was no 5 evidence through time records or any employee 6 records to show that there was mass call-out or 7 sick-outs. All of those things could have 8 easily been introduced into the record. None 9 of that evidence was provided to the 10 Commission. 11 It also did not discipline any 12 employees. If there was any kind of mass 13 sick-out, you'd think that Tropicana would have 14 attempted to discipline employees. No 15 discipline was imposed on employees. No 16 records of any discipline. No records of time 17 sheets were submitted. 18 They also blamed the cleanliness on 19 sabotage and that -- they did present -- 20 attempt to present evidence. However, this 21 evidence proves just the opposite. There were 22 five reported incidents of vandalism between 23 March and June, two of which occurred in 24 nonpublic areas. And according to Mr. 25 Giannantonio, they might have just been a 0014 1 couple of employees causing this. These five 2 incidents of vandalism are not what made the 3 regular customers so unhappy that you'll see in 4 D-11 and in the DGE's report. If the Tropicana 5 were actually submit undergoing or experiencing 6 a wave of vandalism, then one has to wonder why 7 the security director's report reduced the 8 number of security officers. Preventing and 9 remedy to vandalism is part of a superior 10 first-class in Atlantic City. 11 The Applicant's insistence on blaming 12 Local 54 and its employees for its own failure 13 to staff its facilities shows that the 14 Applicant is not going to change in how it 15 operates or take responsibility for the quality 16 of its casino. 17 The real reason -- we all know the real 18 reason why Tropicana became unsanitary, and 19 that's because the cleaning staff was cut in 20 half. William Yung testified under oath that 21 most of the planned staff reductions -- this 22 was before they took over -- would be made 23 through attrition and before making cuts. On 24 November 2nd, 2006, he said he has to get there 25 first and analyze the whole thing. They took 0015 1 over on January 3rd. Nonetheless, that same 2 month, 22 public areas attendants were laid 3 off. In mid-March another 59 public area 4 attendants were laid off, bringing the total 5 number of positions eliminated to 81. This was 6 more than half of the public areas attendants, 7 and no positions have been restored. To this 8 day there's only 73 public area attendants that 9 remain on the job. 10 Yung testified that he -- in sworn 11 statements to the DGE that he used his 12 experience in the hotel industry to determine 13 how many employees were needed in the hotel and 14 food and beverage outfits -- outlets. He said 15 we have other large properties that may be not 16 as large as this but, you know, 800 room 17 properties. And so you know the amount of work 18 it takes to serve rooms or serve meals, or 19 check in people. You know, we know how many 20 people there should be. But Yung did not have 21 experience at operating a large casino like the 22 Tropicana Atlantic City that would enable him 23 to intelligently gauge how many public area 24 attendants he should eliminate on the casino 25 floor and still maintain a first-class 0016 1 facility. 2 Throughout the hearing, the Tropicana's 3 witnesses touted the importance of the analysis 4 and identifying inefficiencies. And indeed Mr. 5 Giannantonio testified that the case, for 6 example, public area staff, we didn't do the 7 reduction in one day. It took months to figure 8 out the analysis. Again, the record 9 contradicts that testimony in that the numbers 10 were reduced by half -- in half by March of 11 2007. 12 The 81 full-time equivalents equates to 13 20 public area attendants per shift, calculated 14 on three shifts, seven days per weak. The 15 public area attendants are responsible for 16 cleaning the casino floor, the public 17 bathrooms, and other public areas. The 18 Commission records show that there is more than 19 138,000 square feet of casino floor. According 20 to Fred Buro's unrefuted testimony, there are 21 57 public bathrooms, as many as 32 stalls and 22 16 sinks in one, 28 elevators and 24 23 escalators. There's -- according to Tropicana 24 witnesses, there's 12,000 customers that visit 25 daily. It is beyond belief that 20 employees 0017 1 could possibly clean a facility on this scale, 2 clean with the number of customers that traffic 3 the areas. 4 Mr. Giannantonio also approached -- 5 testified about the new approach to cleaning 6 the Tropicana. That you just look for dirt, 7 and when you see dirt, you find it and clean 8 it. The quote is, "We tell people to find dirt 9 and clean it." In other words, only dirt that 10 is visible is cleaned. The superficial 11 approach to keeping Tropicana clean bears a 12 striking resemblance to the allegation in the 13 Park Cattle Company's counterclaims in the Park 14 Cattle case, which is Park Cattle Company 15 versus Wimar Tahoe Corp., which is found in the 16 Commission's record at D-39. 17 We submit in conclusion here that we 18 don't want the Tropicana to close. We want it 19 to be maintained as a first-class facility. 20 But this company can't do it. It doesn't have 21 the will or the wherewithal to do it. 22 Therefore, we respectfully request that 23 the Commission appoint a conservator to operate 24 the casino -- the Tropicana in Atlantic City, 25 and we believe that if you -- the Act 0018 1 authorizes you to appoint and constitute a 2 conservator to, among other things, take over 3 and into his possession and control all the 4 property and businesses of the licenses 5 relating to the casino on the approved level. 6 And we believe that that is what is best 7 here. And we respectfully submit that the 8 license for the Tropicana be denied and that 9 the Commission appoint a conservator to take 10 over the casino hotel here. 11 Thank you. 12 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. 13 Acting Director Maher? 14 MS. MAHER: Thank you. Madame Chair, 15 members of the Commission. Good afternoon. 16 When I was thinking about my closing 17 remarks in this matter, one old saying came to 18 mind. Never bite off more than you can chew. 19 And that in -- really, in a very simplistic 20 way, sums up what happened here. Bill Yung bit 21 off more than he could chew with the Aztar 22 purchase and everything that came with it, 23 including the Tropicana Atlantic City. 24 And this really is about Mr. Yung 25 because by his own words, he is Tropicana, 0019 1 Incorporated. This is evident in almost every 2 aspect of how the Tropicana, Incorporated, has 3 done business at the Atlantic City Tropicana. 4 It is very difficult to say after this 5 hearing that they have established by clear and 6 convincing evidence that they have the 7 sufficient business ability and casino 8 experience as to establish the likelihood of 9 creation and maintenance of a successful, 10 efficient casino operation. Why? As Fred Buro 11 said when he testified, the Aztar acquisition 12 was a paradigm shift for the company. "But to 13 simply put it, the portfolio of Columbia Sussex 14 at that time had nothing that did $605 million 15 per year in revenue." 16 Columbia Sussex, by all accounts, by the 17 testimony, the evidence that was presented, the 18 report, was a company that ran Marriott hotels 19 and smaller riverboat casinos. It appears that 20 Mr. Yung was just not willing or able to do 21 what it takes to run an Atlantic City casino 22 hotel operation, to establish and to maintain 23 an approved hotel and casino which is in all 24 respect as first-class facility of exceptional 25 quality that will help maintain Atlantic City 0020 1 as a resort, tourist, and convention 2 destination. 3 As Mr. Yung himself said in his 4 testimony, the Tropicana Atlantic City was his 5 largest operation to date. He has very little 6 experience in operating a casino of its size 7 and nature. But in spite of all that, he 8 indicated when he testified that he saw no 9 difference in operating a large hotel casino 10 the size of the Atlantic City Tropicana and 11 other properties. And he did nothing in 12 particular to prepare for this experience. And 13 that nothing in particular that he did to 14 prepare shows in what we have seen over the 15 last 11 months. 16 Furthermore, it seems as if Mr. Yung did 17 not have enough of the proper personnel in 18 place to ensure his success in this endeavor. 19 Tropicana, Incorporated, has had three CFOs in 20 the past 12 house. The president and CEO, Fred 21 Buro, brought on board to run the casino side 22 of the operation was terminated after seven 23 months. The Director of Security Michael Lyons 24 was terminated after seven months as well. 25 Kevin Preston, Senior Vice President for Casino 0021 1 Operations of the corporation has only been 2 there since June of 2007. Most of the higher 3 level executives at the Atlantic City Tropicana 4 were terminated immediately, including 5 experienced legal counsel. The Tropicana has 6 had only two lawyers for the entire company, a 7 company with the casino operations in five 8 different jurisdictions. 9 And when asked what people were put in 10 place to transition the company, Donna More 11 candidly admitted when she testified that she 12 probably just did a lot of it herself. What 13 this really boils down to is a corporate 14 philosophy to run a lean, efficient operation. 15 To consolidate to save money and ultimately 16 make money. A corporate philosophy that most 17 likely isn't going to change any time soon and 18 appears not to be working at the Atlantic City 19 Tropicana. This is evident in so many ways. 20 Snapshots if you will, as I believe 21 Commissioner Frulio referred on in one line of 22 questioning. 23 Let's take a look at some of those 24 snapshots, some of those issues that were 25 addressed during the course of this hearing, 0022 1 issues that the Division brought up in its 2 opening statement. The management service 3 agreement. Agreements that, by testimony and 4 reports, are agreements to consolidate services 5 for both the casino and hotel side of Tropicana 6 Incorporated's operations. Services such as 7 payroll, accounting, et cetera. These 8 agreements consolidate local services to the 9 corporate level and ultimately lead to layoffs 10 at various properties, again consistent with 11 Mr. Yung's corporate philosophy. In New Jersey 12 such agreements cannot be in place and 13 effective until approved by the Commission. 14 Since January of 2007 there has been a 15 great deal of confusion over these management 16 service agreements in New Jersey. The fact 17 that they are not effective in New Jersey and 18 whether or not if the Tropicana, 19 Incorporated's, plans to seek any permission to 20 make them effective, and what the actual result 21 of that would be. This issue was not made any 22 clearer, I would submit, during the course of 23 this hearing. The answer was generally, I 24 don't know. 25 Surprisingly, Mr. Yung when questioned 0023 1 about the management service agreements, which 2 seemed to be an integral component of his 3 corporate philosophy, said he was not at all 4 familiar with the management service 5 agreements. Furthermore, even though the 6 agreements were not effective in New Jersey, 7 there was testimony and evidence that fees 8 accrued under them, admittedly a mistake. 9 However, when questioned about the mistake, 10 general counsel for the company, Donna More, 11 said she could not explain how they did occur. 12 Moreover, from the a financial 13 standpoint, the Tropicana entities by virtue of 14 inadequacy and procedures and a result in error 15 violated leverage covenant and are in technical 16 default of their credit facility arrangement. 17 As a consequence, the revolver is not 18 available, and the Tropicana must renegotiate 19 with its lenders, apparently at a more 20 stringent and in less favorable terms. 21 At this point the financial stability of 22 the operation is in flux. From a financial 23 performance aspect, the Division has serious 24 concerns with the effects of the layoffs, 25 especially at the Atlantic City facility, 0024 1 coupled with an inability to address patron 2 needs and the failure to address even minimum 3 capital expenditures for its operations in 4 forecasts. 5 Tropicana projects upstreaming all 6 available funds form the Atlantic City 7 operations for other than Atlantic City's 8 operational needs. This course, if not 9 reversed, will not serve the Tropicana Atlantic 10 City over the long term. 11 Somewhat related to this as well is an 12 issue brought up by Local 54, patron 13 complaints. Issues of service and cleanliness, 14 which again go back to the Tropicana Atlantic 15 City's ability to create and maintain a 16 successful, efficient casino operation in 17 compliance with the statutory policies that 18 require them to establish and maintain an 19 approved hotel which is in all respects a 20 first-class facility. Disconcerting was the 21 number of written patron complaints found by or 22 discovered by the Division in the Tropicana's 23 player development files. And this was no by 24 means -- and this was, by no means, all of 25 them. No one was able through the course of 0025 1 the hearing -- no was able to testify about how 2 the Tropicana was handling these complaints to 3 move the property forward. In fact, no one 4 ever testified that they read them completely, 5 let alone formed a comprehensive response to 6 deal with them. Instead of addressing the 7 issue of patron complaints, the Tropicana 8 personnel sought to blame the problem on 9 vandalism and what they claim were disgruntled 10 union employees, a claim only supported by five 11 incident reports spanning through the months of 12 March 2007 through June of 2007, some of which 13 shows no proof of vandalism and none of which 14 showed proof that the union or employees were 15 involved. 16 Another component of this area is the 17 detailed 15-page letter from the National 18 Environmental Health Association regarding 19 conditions at the Atlantic City Tropicana for a 20 convention stay which involved a number of 21 rooms. Again, listening to the witnesses, 22 listening to the evidence, there appeared to be 23 no response in terms of how to deal with this 24 issue. However, there was testimony that 25 perhaps the convention was simply trying to get 0026 1 out of paying a portion of their bill. Or that 2 this complaint was suspicious because the 3 management alleges no one at the convention 4 complained while they were actually on the 5 property, an allegation that is refuted by the 6 contents of the letter itself. 7 And, finally, perhaps most disturbingly, 8 Mark Giannantonio testified that he was made 9 aware of the letter but did not contact the 10 National Environmental Health Association, and 11 he was not sure that anyone from the Tropicana 12 Atlantic City did. When asked if he thought it 13 was important for him as the CFO and president 14 of the company to reach out to the group he 15 said, "I mean, yeah, I guess that could be the 16 case, but I did not do that." 17 Also to be considered as another of 18 those snapshots or another one of those areas 19 that we brought up in our opening statement is 20 the regulatory -- I'm sorry, is the regulatory 21 compliance in New Jersey as well as other 22 jurisdictions. To put it lightly, there seems 23 to be a lack of concern about staying compliant 24 with various jurisdictions' gaming regulations 25 if not an outright willful disregard for 0027 1 regulators. When questioned about regulatory 2 violations in other jurisdictions, Indiana, 3 Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, Mr. Yung 4 appeared to have no real knowledge of the 5 complaints or little interest in addressing 6 them. He testified that he does not dialog 7 with Donna More about compliance issues. 8 Although she testified she discussed all 9 regulatory violation complaints with him. 10 Mr. Yung was not aware of the important 11 independent audit committee issue which was 12 discussed during the course of this hearing. 13 He admitted it was important for him to know 14 about the regulations and make sure he's in 15 compliance. That's his responsibility. But he 16 has not done that. He was not knowledgeable 17 about the Indiana regulations, and he quote -- 18 and he considered regulatory violations in 19 Indiana insignificant. And that's a quote. 20 As to the Bank Secrecy Act violations 21 with the Lighthouse Casino in Mississippi, 22 prior to being charged with these violations, 23 Mr. Yung indicated he was not even aware of 24 Bank Secrecy Act requirements, although 25 interestingly enough, he had owned casinos for 0028 1 ten years prior to that. Nor was he aware that 2 Nevada regulators were monitoring workforce 3 reductions at the Tropicana Las Vegas. 4 Finally, perhaps most telling of all in 5 this area are Mr. Yung's words to Fred Buro in 6 response to the notification requests from the 7 New Jersey regulators in regards to layoffs. 8 "Is this the way you guys do business in New 9 Jersey?" And "I told you not to tell the 10 regulators. Now you go back and make those 11 cuts, or I will find someone who will." 12 Connected to this issue, but deserving a 13 particular attention, is the independent audit 14 committee complaint filed by the Division. 15 Regulations require each supervisor of a casino 16 mandatory surveillance and internal department 17 to report to an independent audit committee on 18 matters of policy, purpose, responsibility, and 19 authority. For six months, from January 3rd, 20 2007 to June 29th of 2007, the Tropicana 21 Atlantic City, by their own admission, was 22 without such an independent audit committee. 23 In response to this, the Tropicana argues that 24 they were engaging in a continuing dialog with 25 regulators and that this somehow excuses their 0029 1 failure to comply with the regulations. The 2 Division would submit that this dialog centered 3 around the Tropicana's desire to place 4 corporate management on a committee that by 5 regulation is to be independent. 6 It is clear from Donna More's testimony 7 she was aware of this requirement from day one. 8 And as Commissioner Epps put it, from day one 9 they were out of compliance. 10 The petition was finally filed on June 11 1st of 2007 with a proposed independent audit 12 committee structure. The independent audit 13 committee as it now exists for Tropicana 14 Atlantic City, a single-person audit committee 15 comprised of Jeffrey Silver, Esq., was finally 16 proposed in a June 14th, 2007, petition. 17 Even with the final formation of this 18 committee, problems still exist. The legal 19 services agreement signed by Donna More and Mr. 20 Silver not only indicates what his compensation 21 is for serving on the audit committee but also 22 provides that the Trop may also -- Tropicana 23 may also engaged his law firm to represent 24 Tropicana in different or additional matters. 25 This compromised the independent aspect of the 0030 1 independent audit committee. Perhaps it can be 2 argued that Mr. Silver became independent 3 during the course of this hearing, but for the 4 months leading up to this hearing, he was not. 5 The Division would submit that the 6 independent audit committee still does not 7 appear to be functioning properly based on the 8 testimony that we heard over the last two 9 weeks. According to Donna More's testimony, 10 two meeting have been held, one in June of 2007 11 via telephone, the other in November of 2007 in 12 Las Vegas. No one was present -- no one from 13 surveillance was present at either of those 14 meetings. And minutes from the November 15 meeting have still not yet been prepared. 16 The seriousness of this violation must 17 be noted, and the Division believes that it has 18 been noted by the Commission order that the 19 audit committee complaint hearing be 20 consolidated with the licensing hearing. The 21 functions of surveillance and internal audit 22 are vital, critical functions of any casino 23 operation, therein effecting the independent 24 arm of the casino to monitor operations within 25 the casino. And for six long months the 0031 1 Atlantic City Tropicana surveillance department 2 and internal audit department had no 3 independent oversight from the management they 4 are tasked with monitoring, no independent 5 audit committee to report to as is required by 6 the regulations. 7 The Division cannot stress enough the 8 importance of an independent audit committee. 9 The failure to comply with this regulation is 10 serious and compounded by the fact that this 11 went on for six months, and that the audit 12 committee is to this date does not appear to be 13 functioning properly. This independent audit 14 committee requirement is a linchpin within our 15 regulatory system to ensure its integrity 16 regarding two critical functions of the casino, 17 surveillance and independent audit. 18 The Division asks this Commission to 19 find the Tropicana in violation of the two 20 counts in the independent audit committee 21 complaint and submits that a substantial 22 six-figure fine would be appropriate. 23 And finally, layoffs. By all accounts 24 the Tropicana Atlantic City has terminated 25 nearly one quarter of their workforce in only 0032 1 ten months. The majority of this reduction was 2 done through large-scale layoffs that cut 3 across every department of the hotel and 4 casino. The driving force is behind this 5 layoffs is not to be more efficient but to make 6 more money. Again, consistent with the 7 corporate philosophy of Mr. Yung. 8 The decision to make these layoffs came 9 even before June of 2007 before an assessment 10 or analysis could be made of Tropicana Atlantic 11 City. It came on the road show when Mr. Yung 12 told potential investors he was going to cut 13 $40 million in payroll at the Tropicana 14 Atlantic City. These cuts began within 30 to 15 60 days of the takeover of the Atlantic City 16 Tropicana. And according to Mr. Yung, through 17 his own testimony, this was the numbers, the 18 dollars decision. "I think it was just that 19 the business was declining so that we had to 20 make cuts." These cuts came with no real 21 assessments or analysis of the needs of 22 Atlantic City Tropicana. Mr. Yung made them 23 based on his own experience running other 24 casinos and in his "industrial engineering 25 background." 0033 1 This arrogant approach to the layoffs 2 resulted in a number of mistakes. A proposal 3 to reduce the locksmith staff to one, not even 4 know what a locksmith did, but making the cuts 5 because he had never heard of a locksmith in a 6 casino. Slot attendants laid off, causing such 7 a disruption in service that they had to hire 8 some of them back. 9 The layoffs in the hotel side in 10 particular caused immediate disruption and 11 deterioration of the condition of the property. 12 As Fred Buro said, those cuts were too fast and 13 too deep. There was an abrupt turndown in the 14 cleanliness and service of the property which 15 affected the casino as well as the hotel 16 operations. And for all the talk of the 17 efficiencies being the driving force behind the 18 layoffs, it is clear that the driving force was 19 dollars. Dollars that needed to be saved as 20 revenue decline. 21 It appears that this became a vicious 22 cycle. Layoffs caused the property to decline, 23 which caused the loss of patrons, which in turn 24 led to more layoffs. Fred Buro testified that 25 for a variety of reasons, the forecast for 0034 1 gross revenue was not being met. Mr. Yung's 2 position was in response to that was they 3 needed more cuts to compensate, and they needed 4 them faster. 5 The most telling is the piece of paper 6 that Mr. Yung handed Fred Buro proposing 7 layoffs in table games, marketing and player 8 development tied to nothing but dollar figures. 9 One area of particular concern in the 10 layoffs was the security department. A number 11 of disturbing things came out during the course 12 of this hearing regarding security staff 13 layoffs. The Glenn Koehler report. Glenn 14 Koehler, the Director of Security, Risk 15 Management, and Surveillance for the Tropicana, 16 Incorporated. The company expert came to the 17 Atlantic City Tropicana in June of 2007 to 18 assess the security staffing situation. And 19 according to two highly credible witnesses who 20 testified before this Commission, Mr. Koehler 21 told them verbally after his assessment that 22 the Tropicana Atlantic City needed additional 23 security personnel. However, his report dated 24 just a few days later recommended cuts. What 25 is disturbing about this is that a review of 0035 1 his report showed a complete lack of 2 understanding of New Jersey regulations and the 3 security needs at the Tropicana Atlantic City. 4 It also included a dollar figure. How much in 5 savings would be achieved by the proposed 6 security cuts? It is unclear where Mr. Koehler 7 got these numbers to come up with this dollar 8 figure in savings. And as Mike Lyons, the 9 person who was directing him, taking care of 10 him, helping him make the assessment testified 11 he did not provide them. And that Mr. Koehler 12 adamantly denied having any contact with 13 corporate management over this report, the 14 contents. 15 Even more disturbing is the fact that it 16 appears that Mr. Glenn Koehler, the Director of 17 Security, Risk Management, and Surveillance for 18 Tropicana perjured himself before this 19 Commission when he stated that he never told 20 anyone at the Atlantic City Tropicana property 21 that he recommended additional security staff. 22 Security staffing was a major portion of 23 the 320 layoffs proposed in the August 7th, 24 2007, letter to the regulations. Mr. Yung 25 testified that they proposed laying off the 0036 1 proposed 350 people in August because "business 2 was really declining very quickly." 3 Testimony of Kevin Preston regarding 4 this round of layoffs indicated there was 5 little or no assessments to come up with this 6 320 number. One very telling aspect of this is 7 they were using the Showboat as a comparison to 8 the Tropicana for security staffing needs. Not 9 because it was truly comparable in size or 10 layout to the Tropicana and, in fact, it was 11 not. But because "it was the only information 12 I could attain." The Division submits that it 13 was only in response to the regulators reaction 14 and intervention that the 320 layoffs were not 15 effectuated. 16 Finally, at the conclusion of all this, 17 it is perhaps most disturbing -- most 18 disturbing is Mr. Yung's testimony regarding 19 the layoffs and the cuts. "I firmly believe 20 that our layoffs that we made and our 21 reductions in no way affected service." 22 At the outset of this hearing, if you'll 23 remember two weeks ago, the Division expressed 24 concerns in these areas that I have outlined. 25 Having evaluated the Applicant's responses and 0037 1 presentations, the Division cannot recommend 2 the issuance of a plenary five-year license to 3 Tropicana. 4 However, based on the totality of 5 circumstances, including the Applicant's 6 representations, the welfare of the Tropicana's 7 workforce, and the public interest, the 8 Division will recommend the issuance of a 9 shorter term license to Tropicana; one year, 10 with stringent conditions in all the areas of 11 concern. We have prepared a list of proposed 12 conditions for licensure, which I will not read 13 into the record but which I will distribute at 14 the conclusion of my closing remarks. 15 It is the Division's believe that the 16 course of action will provide Tropicana and 17 especially its holding companies with the 18 opportunity to correct and, we hope, improve 19 their operations within the regulatory 20 framework. 21 This shortened license term will also 22 provide the Division and the Commission with a 23 mechanism to assess Tropicana's efforts in a 24 timely manner. Be assured that it is the 25 Division's intention through ongoing 0038 1 investigations and monitoring of relevant 2 areas, in particular any conditions imposed, to 3 address any instances of noncompliance. We 4 will also fully and completely report to the 5 Commission all relevant information regarding 6 those companies and qualifiers so that the 7 Commission may take whatever licensing action, 8 positive or negative, appears appropriate at 9 the conclusion of the license period. 10 Thank you. 11 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. 12 Mr. O'Gara? 13 MR. O'GARA: Yeah. Madame Chair, 14 members of the Commission, Director. 15 As the Director says, it's been a 16 lengthy hearing. We've been here for two 17 weeks. And initially we started out, and I 18 think over the two weeks, we've heard a great 19 deal of testimony. There's over a hundred 20 exhibits here. And the question now is what 21 does all of that mean, and what is it, and 22 where do we go? I think at the outset, we need 23 to take a step back. And as I indicated in my 24 opening, we have to determine what, in fact, 25 this hearing was about. And I submit to you 0039 1 that it's about two core issues. And the first 2 is whether or not the Tropicana Entertainment 3 and its affiliates and its qualified 4 principals -- and that's principally William 5 Yung -- have demonstrated to the standards 6 specified in the Act that they are qualified in 7 all respects to own and operate a casino hotel 8 in Atlantic City. 9 And the second is, in addition to the 10 plenary qualification, whether or not the 11 casino license of the New Jersey facility, 12 which is the Tropicana, should be renewed for 13 the term permitted by the statute. And I 14 submit to you that the proofs that you've heard 15 today indicate the answer to both those 16 questions is yes. 17 The Tropicana has demonstrated that it 18 meets the plenary qualification renewal 19 criteria, which are largely embodied in 20 Sections 84 and 85 of the Act and regulations 21 that you promulgated pursuant to those sections 22 of the Casino Control Act. And, essentially, 23 they are the establishment of its financial 24 stability, integrity, and responsibility and 25 also the demonstration and proof of its 0040 1 requisite wherewithal and business ability and 2 its integrity to operate a casino hotel 3 consistent with the mandates that are outlined 4 in the Act and the regulations. 5 I submit to you that what we've heard 6 isn't about an admittingly bad 10 days that 7 Tropicana may have had in March or April, and 8 it isn't about patron complaints about bedbugs 9 or dust. What, in fact, this is about is those 10 core elements of the Casino Control Act which 11 are -- which can be summarized in four words 12 that begin with the letter C, and they are: 13 Compliance, competence, cash, and consistency. 14 And I believe, if we turn to the first, 15 which is competent, the question is are we 16 competent? Is Tropicana Entertainment 17 competent to operate the Tropicana in Atlantic 18 City? 19 Are we compliant? Are we understanding 20 of the regulatory system that's imposed upon us 21 here in New Jersey, and can we function and 22 meet its needs and requirements? 23 And character. Do we have the requisite 24 character? Can you trust us? Can you trust 25 Bill Yung and the team he's assembled, which 0041 1 includes Donna More, Mark Giannantonio, Kevin 2 Preston, and Tama Hughes? 3 And do we have the cash? Are we 4 financially stable? Can we meet the vagaries 5 of this market, which you've experienced over 6 the last year and which, apparently, we'll 7 continue to experience for some time as there 8 is some equalization in the market. 9 First let's speak to competence. The 10 company is led by Bill Yung. His background 11 and experience -- he testified to you how he 12 began, where he came from, what he built. He's 13 simply applying that experience along with the 14 knowledge he gathers through this industry to 15 operating a first-class hotel. Ask yourself 16 would Bill Yung, a man who came from where he 17 came, and who's accomplished, what he has 18 accomplished, would he come here and 19 intentionally take the largest hotel in his 20 portfolio and try to run it into the ground? 21 It makes no sense. Would he intentionally 22 eliminate positions with the known consequence 23 of failing? I submit to you that he would not. 24 Admittedly, as Bill told you on the 25 stand, there were mistakes that were made, and 0042 1 as mistakes were made, they were rectified. 2 When they dealt with issues such as slot 3 attendants and response time, he realized and 4 took the input that he got from his people and 5 made the changes that were required. 6 Were there proposals that perhaps came 7 from lack of understanding? And one of them is 8 one which apparently Commissioner Frulio and I 9 have fenced about for some time, hopefully not 10 disrespectfully, but -- and there was a 11 proposal to eliminate locksmiths. But you -- 12 in fact, what happened? The locksmiths were 13 not eliminated. There was an understanding 14 that here they did something they don't do 15 other places. There are obviously regulations 16 which differ here about how we deal with things 17 on the floor and locks. And it's not so much 18 about hotel locks which work with cards but 19 it's about floor locks that are on the lock 20 boxes. And when, in fact, that information was 21 reviewed and a decision was made, the decision 22 was made not to make those changes. So I think 23 it's important we look at the whole record. 24 And what is it that's been the result of 25 Bill Yung's 11 months here with his company? 0043 1 There's been a 94 percent occupancy rate at the 2 hotel. Mr. Giannantonio's told you that the 3 convention business continues in the largest 4 convention facility in Atlantic City at the 5 rates that it continued and, in fact, is 6 improving. And that he is dedicated to 7 building that business beyond its already 8 healthy levels. 9 There have been renovations on the 10 casino floor. There have been restaurant 11 renovations that haven't been done for 18 12 years. There's, in fact, been the renovations 13 of the south tower. And everyone who was on 14 the stand was asked, but wasn't that planned 15 under the prior management? Well, planning and 16 planning will do you nothing. It, in fact, was 17 done with money from this company. They had 18 been planning for those renovations for some 19 time. Those rooms have not been renovated 20 since that hotel was constructed. That hotel 21 was constructed in the early 1980s. 22 There have been capital expenditures of 23 $30 million, which include the floor changes, 24 the machine changes the hotel renovations, the 25 restaurant renovations, the two restaurants who 0044 1 hadn't been accomplished in two decades. There 2 have been additional amenities. There have 3 been improvements large and small. And I 4 submit to you that they exhibit an attitude and 5 a degree of expertise in some areas which have 6 improved the Tropicana. And with respect to 7 areas where there has been a learning curve, 8 there has been an understanding and a learning. 9 This facility is being improved substantially. 10 The Director mentioned there were issues 11 about capital expenditures. I ask you to 12 assess the testimony you heard that, in fact, 13 when the forecasts were prepared, they included 14 the maintenance Capex but did not include the 15 Capex which would take you to the quote-unquote 16 five-percent levels. However, their practice 17 had been in the past to identify those projects 18 as part of an annual budget cycle and then to 19 then do the project. There was a clear 20 indication that there will be additional 21 capital projects between -- beyond the 22 maintenance Capex. And I would suggest to you 23 that's demonstrated by the $30 million which 24 has been spent in the first 12 months. 25 Clearing, understanding how to forecast 0045 1 under the regulation is important. And, 2 clearly, I think the message is understood. 3 But I ask you to assess what was done with 4 respect to those capital expenditures in the 5 first year as you assess how there will be 6 compliance with that regulation. 7 All of these changes that occurred are 8 occurring with a group of people who have to 9 lead the Tropicana going forward? And who are 10 they? It's Mark Giannantonio who is a person 11 from Atlantic City. I think by anyone's 12 measure, a capable and experienced leader. 13 Someone who understands his property, someone 14 who has experience in both of the silos we 15 heard about that exist inside of a hotel, and 16 who looks forward to getting past what has 17 occurred and moving on to build and have the 18 business grow so that not only the Tropicana 19 but, in fact, the Tropicana along with the city 20 absorbs what's happened in Pennsylvania, 21 absorbs the changes that come with the social 22 change of a smoking ban, and continues to grow 23 the business so that Mr. Yung can then go ahead 24 and do what he told you his ultimate goal is, 25 which is, he's a developer. He builds things. 0046 1 He may manage them. But the 80 hotels he has, 2 he has built. He owns the real estate, and he 3 builds them. He bought the Tropicana in Las 4 Vegas as a development project. 5 Who else? Kevin Preston. Kevin's 6 brought his casino analysis to this operation. 7 He didn't arrive in town as some kind of 8 hatchet man or someone to do damage. He 9 arrived as someone to tried to get his arms 10 around what was going on and to find answers to 11 problems and help grow the company. There's 12 been comment about, and we've all heard the 13 testimony about, whatever happened when Mr. 14 Koehler was here and said something to Mr. Buro 15 and said something to Miss Hughes? And then 16 had a report which appears to be at variance. 17 Mr. Preston was confronted with that. And what 18 was Mr. Preston's reaction? Mr. Preston's 19 reaction was to back up and say, hold it. This 20 doesn't quite make sense. I mean, people were 21 added. They heard something. Very credible. 22 There's a report that's at variance. He didn't 23 take any action. He went on to see what the 24 story was and try to get a solution that met 25 the needs of the Tropicana but that just didn't 0047 1 respond to a report that was at variance to 2 what his own people were telling him. And, 3 ultimately, he comes to us with experience from 4 a wide range of markets. I know he was asked 5 about his program at Harrah's. Most of his 6 time was spent in the Chicagoland market. It's 7 a very large market. Other than Nevada and New 8 Jersey, the largest. Many of the executives 9 that perform here every day and who run these 10 properties came from that very market. 11 Donna More. Donna came to the company 12 in order to function as general counsel and to 13 ensure that there was compliance. What 14 background does Miss More bring? Ms. More 15 brings a background which includes a long 16 period of service in the private practice of 17 law and with public gaming companies and 18 private gaming companies representing their 19 interests and understanding the regulatory 20 systems in which they function. Additionally, 21 she served as the initial administrator for the 22 Illinois Gaming Board. Prior to that she 23 served as the United States Attorney as the 24 Cooke County attorney. She comes with her 25 integrity. She comes with her willingness to 0048 1 undertake all these tasks, and she brings to 2 you that reputation and commitment to get 3 things done. 4 I submit to you that this group going 5 forward are a group that you can rely on, you 6 should rely on, and will not disappoint you. 7 We've also heard about patron 8 complaints, and we've heard about them at some 9 length today. I would submit to you that the 10 71 patron complaints in this record are 11 probably not the only 71 patron complaints 12 which have occurred in the city of Atlantic 13 City over the last nine months. Each of them 14 stands on their own legs. None of them were 15 substantiated by someone who came in with a 16 specific picture, testimony. They are, in 17 fact, complaints. Many of them raise issues 18 which had to be addressed and were addressed. 19 But I suggest to you that as the testimony did, 20 that very often these complaints may bear as 21 much relationship to the number of occupied 22 room nights inside of a facility as they do to 23 anything else. That is that a three-room hotel 24 which has three complaints in two weeks is one 25 statistical measure. Another statistical 0049 1 measure is 71 room complaints in a 2200 room 2 hotel which is 94 percent occupied over a 3 period of ten months. That, in fact, each of 4 them is something which Mr. Giannantonio has 5 told you would be a concern of his, will be a 6 concern of his, and going forward he, in fact, 7 has indicated that they've tried to address 8 issues that are raised as they do issues that 9 are raised by any patron. 10 Were there problems over the -- at the 11 Tropicana over the last year? Mr. Yung 12 candidly told you yes. The March and April 13 period, when there was a housekeeping problem 14 in public areas, is one which the Tropicana has 15 had to relive again through this hearing. How 16 long a period was it? It appears to have been 17 a week to 10 days, 14 days. Does anyone 18 honestly think that some of the issues were not 19 directly caused by some type of action that was 20 taken by people who had a goal? Does anyone 21 seriously think that there is not some type of 22 relationship between the graffiti and the 23 sabotage and the discontent about changes in 24 personnel policies and layoffs? And some of 25 the actions which occurred? Half of the public 0050 1 area employees call out over a period of time. 2 There's credible evidence that, in fact, some 3 of the things that happened couldn't happen by 4 accident. That, in fact, were things that have 5 to bear with them intention by the people who 6 caused them. And isn't it telling that after 7 there's been some period of time and people 8 came to understand schedules, and Mr. 9 Giannantonio and his staff worked with these 10 people, that as we stand here today these 11 approximate don't reoccur? That the workforce 12 has come to understand the policies and, in 13 fact, the goals that Mr. Giannantonio is trying 14 to set forth have been met, and the property's 15 now undoubtedly clean. And we submit that it 16 tells you that while there may have been 17 difficulties that in this one area that the 18 adjustment to the staffing has been made and, 19 in fact, the problem has been addressed. 20 This hearing is more -- it's about much 21 more than ten days in March and April. And to 22 suggest that Mr. Yung and his company and Mr. 23 Giannantonio and his staff can't operate a 24 casino hotel based upon incidents that happened 25 in two days in April is an insult not only to 0051 1 the -- Mr. Giannantonio and his staff, but it 2 defies credulity and, in fact, is not reality. 3 You'll recall Mr. Buro, who is not a 4 particular friend at this point in time of Mr. 5 Yung's, I would suggest, said in this testimony 6 that Bill Yung is an excellent hotel operator. 7 He also indicated that Mr. Yung told him that 8 the goal was to get things done but to comply, 9 that he wanted to obey the law. Does he, in 10 fact, know every nuance of every regulation and 11 every applicable portion of our statute? No. 12 Does any CEO? No. Should he know more? Yes. 13 Has he probably learned a lot more here over 14 the last two weeks? Yes. Does he have the 15 people now who can make sure that he has a full 16 understanding and a fulsome understanding of 17 what it is that you need in order to find him 18 to be compliant? Yes. Were there layoffs? 19 Yes. Were they, in fact, an attempt to 20 increase efficiency and, yes, maximize 21 revenues? Yes. 22 Clearly, Mr. Yung invested $500 million 23 of his own money, significant amounts in excess 24 of a billion dollars of debt investor money. 25 There have to be returns. He realizes that to 0052 1 get those returns, you have to operate a 2 facility. No one is here to commit suicide. 3 No one is here to suggest that they want to 4 operate a facility in such a way that it is not 5 successful. Because that lack of success of 6 the facility is the very lack of success of the 7 goals that they seek, whether it be success as 8 a company, their reputation, their return to 9 their investing. Clearly, Mr. Yung's goals are 10 the same as yours. 11 What kind of corrections were 12 undertaken? What mistakes did Mr. Yung make? 13 Clearly, he told you that when he saw what 14 happened at the slot attendants, in fact, slot 15 attendants were brought back. Player 16 development. Mr. Buro made changes in player 17 development. Mr. Yung saw those changes, saw 18 changes in comp rates, saw changes in 19 promotional expenses, and he now sees the 20 consequences. What has happened? Programs to 21 bring back additional customers. Programs to 22 bring back player development people and 23 establish a player development program that 24 will be successful in this city. Programs to 25 put cash on the street in order to build share, 0053 1 building share to then retain customers. I 2 think it's clear from not only the testimony of 3 Mr. Giannantonio but the testimony of Mr. Yung 4 that, in fact, the message was received. 5 The Director alluded to the issues 6 involving security. Were there proposals with 7 respect to security that perhaps you may view 8 as unrealistic? Yes. Were Mr. Buro, Ms. 9 Hughes, and others given an indication that 10 changes were needed, and, in fact, was there 11 then a report which was contrary to those 12 suggestions? Yes. Did Mr. Koehler perjure 13 himself? I didn't call Mr. Koehler. I called 14 Mr. Yung. And I suggest to you that Mr. 15 Koehler's report was never a deciding factor in 16 anything that happened at the Tropicana. When 17 all the exhibits are sorted through, when all 18 the testimony is reviewed, any changes that 19 were made in the security staff at the 20 Tropicana after whatever missteps may have been 21 taken in trying to get to that place, were made 22 after consultation with the Division and the 23 Commission. Mr. Koehler's report resulted in 24 nothing. 25 Going forward, is there a need to be 0054 1 sure that the security issues that we'll have 2 in the future will be addressed? Yes. Has 3 that message been conveyed? Yes. Is there 4 understanding of that message? I submit to you 5 the answer is yes. 6 Much of what has been in the public 7 domain about the issue of layoffs and changes 8 at the Tropicana is not what we've heard in 9 this room. In the end you have an exhibit 10 which nets out the various terms that have been 11 used here which are quits, terminations, 12 layoffs, reductions in force. In fact, there 13 have been 500 layoffs. That's the net number. 14 In fact, some of those layoffs were in areas 15 where the changes had to be made. In fact, 16 others were in areas where it resulted in a 17 diminution of service and a change was made. 18 People were brought back. Going forward, Mr. 19 Yung has committed to you that, in fact, he 20 will do what is necessary to maintain the 21 business that he has and to grow that business 22 in order to be successful. 23 Remember, Mr. Buro in his sworn 24 interview, had the same view Mr. Yung had at 25 the time of the acquisition. The bidders 0055 1 looking at this property determined there were 2 substantial costs associated with the company, 3 Aztar, which could be dealt with. There was an 4 office in Phoenix with $25 million worth of 5 overhead. There was a view that -- and Mr. 6 Buro shared that view -- that there were 7 overstaffing in areas of the Tropicana, and, in 8 fact, those areas could be addressed and would 9 be addressed in order to run a more efficient 10 yet first-class operation. 11 In some cases perhaps some of those 12 areas were addressed too quickly and a lesson 13 was learned. But there is no question that as 14 we stand here today, the Tropicana has overcome 15 whatever issues there were for a short period 16 of time in the early spring, and it operates as 17 the type of facility of which this city can be 18 proud and which helps to grow the market in 19 this city. 20 I'd like to talk now a moment, if I 21 could, about some of the financial stability 22 issues which the Director mentioned, and she 23 mentioned the covenant breach. That covenant 24 breach, he candidly admitted to you on the 25 stand, results in which is called an event of 0056 1 default. And with that, there have been 2 negotiations with the bank. What do you know 3 about those negotiations with the bank? You 4 know that there are discussions that are 5 ongoing. You know that the bank is willing to 6 have those discussions. You are very aware 7 that the borrower, that is Tropicana, is highly 8 confident that they're going to arrive at a 9 resolution which, number one, will provide them 10 with greater room in dealing with their 11 covenants as they deal with the market which is 12 changing, and that they are fully confident 13 that during the period of those negotiations 14 they have the liquidity to accomplish them. 15 The unrebutted testimony here is there's 16 about a hundred million dollars in cash sitting 17 there to deal with any issues that come up 18 during the time negotiations go on. And it's 19 fully anticipated at the conclusion of 20 negotiations, you have not only the hundred 21 million dollars of flexibility but of the 22 flexibilities afforded by the entirety of the 23 availability of the revolver, which is a 24 substantial line of credit. 25 With respect to the -- to what will 0057 1 happen with that money, you have the commitment 2 from Mr. Yung that he looks forward to 3 additional capital expenditures, and he has 4 demonstrated his willingness to improve the 5 facility by the improvements that were made 6 over the last several months, some of which 7 people have been waiting for for 15 years. 8 I ask you to remember that a lot of 9 people have talked about what they plan to do. 10 They plan to go ahead and renovate rooms. They 11 plan to renovate restaurants. They plan to go 12 ahead and make their slot floor more 13 attractive. But, in fact, all those things 14 stood at the Tropicana as plans and have been 15 accomplished within the last several months. 16 Compliance. I submit to you that the 17 record that you have before you supports a 18 finding that the company takes its compliance 19 obligations very seriously and consciously 20 seeks to fulfill them. Mr. Yung sought out 21 Miss More who had represented him in Illinois 22 and brought her into the company and made her 23 the general counsel and gave her responsibility 24 for compliance. She has a full-time director 25 of compliance. She, in fact, has a full-time 0058 1 general counsel here at Tropicana in Atlantic 2 City. There's an indication that there's 3 another attorney being hired to deal with these 4 issues. You see every day Miss Hughes. You've 5 heard Ms. More. You've heard her interaction 6 with Mr. Yung. You've heard of her 7 accessibility to Mr. Yung. I submit to you 8 that a company that brings Donna More to the 9 table and that has that kind of access to the 10 CEO is a company which is, in fact, and will be 11 compliant. 12 Now, on the record we have a number 13 of -- in the Division report and in the 14 testimony a number of complaints that were 15 brought by the Division and warning letters. I 16 ask you to look at them carefully. They are 17 obviously matters which we have tried to deal 18 with. But look at them again to see how and 19 when they occurred. There's a citation in the 20 reports, you'll find, of $90,000. That fine is 21 for, in fact, activity and conduct that 22 occurred when Aztar controlled his company and 23 Bill Yung was sitting in Cincinnati. The DGE 24 cited 11 complaints. Not all of them involved 25 mismanagement. Five were for conduct when it 0059 1 was Aztar ownership and management. The DGE 2 cited 21 warning letters. There are really 3 only 18, and 11 of them resulted from conduct 4 which occurred when Aztar was, in fact, the 5 owner and in control of this property. 6 The DGE said eight of the warning 7 letters resulted from patron complaints. 8 That's not the case. There are eight letters 9 that responded to private citizens, but they 10 were never sent to us, never saw them, and had 11 no idea what they were. 12 Then there's the famous Bill Yung 13 parking lot conversation with Fred Buro. Did 14 Bill Yung in a private conversation with one of 15 his executives address frustration with 16 regulators? Yes. Did he admit to you on the 17 stand that he expressed frustration with 18 regulators? Yes. You'll have to conclude for 19 yourselves whether he's the only CEO who's ever 20 had any frustration with regulators in New 21 Jersey. I suggest to you perhaps he is not. I 22 also tell you that he told you on the stand 23 that his frustration was his frustration but, 24 in fact, his goal and, in fact, the way he runs 25 his company is to obey the law, to comply with 0060 1 your directive, and he has never shown you 2 anything but respect. He has never publicly 3 commented or criticized anything any regulator 4 did. He's had laid bare a private moment of 5 frustration, and I suggest to you that's an 6 inappropriate basis on which to make a judgment 7 about this man. 8 As we speak of Fred Buro, what did Fred 9 Buro say about Bill Yung that would be 10 pertinent to the considerations you make? He 11 told you that Bill Yung never instructed him to 12 make any cuts that would have violated 13 regulations or statutory requirements. He told 14 him that the company's position on regulatory 15 compliance was the to comply under every 16 circumstance. It was not to violate the 17 regulations at all. He said that Bill Yung 18 told him he always wanted to be compliant. He 19 didn't want to be in the position of disobeying 20 regulations or paying fines. And I suggest to 21 you that these are the words of the same Mr. 22 Buro who had his share of criticisms of Mr. 23 Yung and the person who Mr. Yung relieved of 24 his responsibilities. 25 At this point I have to take just a bit 0061 1 of time and address the complaint which sits 2 astride this case, which is the complaint 3 involving the audit committee, which also, very 4 candidly, is an issue which you have to 5 consider in your overall assessment of the 6 company, its licensure and its qualification. 7 And I suggest it's in two parts. One of them 8 is the complaint as it stands on its own legs, 9 and one of them is the effect it has and the 10 impact it has on the decision you make about 11 qualification and relicensure. 12 There is no doubt that there is a 13 requirement at the time that the interim 14 authorization was granted for Tropicana 15 Entertainment to constitute an independent 16 audit committee which would undertake the 17 regulatorily required supervision for policy 18 purposes of both internal audit and the 19 surveillance department. But as is clear from 20 all the voluminous information you have in 21 front of you and all the testimony you've 22 heard, that did not occur. And, accordingly, 23 Tropicana, in fact, did not comport with that 24 condition. And the allegation of the complaint 25 in a simple word is true. And for that you'll 0062 1 assess a penalty. 2 I ask you in assessing that penalty and 3 in assessing the impact of that to look at the 4 totality of those circumstances. In fact, that 5 there were, whether correct or not, good faith 6 efforts to try to reach an accommodation with a 7 difficult situation which was private company 8 without an independent audit committee and 9 constituting how you would create that. There 10 were discussions back and forth. And whether 11 they were timely or not does not change the 12 fact there wasn't an audit committee. But as 13 you will look at that, look at the fact that 14 there were discussions and policy issues at 15 stake, whether or not you would have 51 percent 16 vested into a person, of the votes, and then 17 have private people or could be a single 18 person. There's no one making up a story here 19 about the dialog. There was a dialog, and I 20 submit to you it was done in good faith. It 21 was done in every effort to comply. But we 22 candidly admit to you that that compliance was 23 not achieved in a timely fashion. 24 While those discussions do not excuse 25 what violation may have occurred, they 0063 1 certainly demonstrate to you that there was not 2 contempt. There's not disregard. There was 3 honest effort to try to resolve our problem. 4 And although unresolved, it certainly speaks to 5 the fact that the company wants to go forward, 6 and at that time wanted to go forward and 7 resolve those issues, even though not 8 accomplished in a timely fashion. 9 Finally, character. And this is the 10 foundation of all the requirements that the Act 11 has regarding licensing. There are no 12 allegations that have been made in this case 13 that cast serious aspersions on the character 14 of Mr. Yung or any of the other qualifiers. 15 You, in fact, have before you the reports that 16 were rendered by the Division of Gaming 17 Enforcement in which they recommended the 18 qualification of each and every one of them. 19 There have been issues raised about Mr. 20 Yung and his knowledge of what happened in 21 Mississippi and whether or not CTRs were filed 22 in a casino he controlled. And he candidly 23 told you, no, they were not. And he candidly 24 told you the action taken was, the person 25 responsible was terminated. I suggest to you 0064 1 that while this is serious, it was handled by 2 FIN CEN. They, in fact, imposed a financial 3 penalty. There was obviously a recognition of 4 the circumstances. It was immediately 5 remedied. This certainly is not the first time 6 that a casino company of this size or even 7 larger has had a violation involving the Bank 8 Secrecy Act. And, in fact, it's not even the 9 longest period of time a major casino company 10 went with having a rogue employee not filing 11 reports, and then finding himself having to 12 remedy that situation with FIN CEN and the 13 regulators. 14 Mr. Yung talked with you about his 15 personal investments and his IRS audit which 16 resulted from his investment into a plan which 17 was brought to him by Grant Thorton, a large, 18 recognized public accounting firm. That plan, 19 which in its complexity as best he could was 20 described to you, involved being able to move 21 money from offshore back to the United States, 22 and through a serious of transactions, minimize 23 the tax impact thereof. In doing so, he took 24 not only Grant Thorton's advice, he sought 25 independent accounting advice and got a legal 0065 1 opinion. Those opinions indicated to him that, 2 in fact, it was more likely than not that that 3 transaction would be tax free. And "more 4 likely than not," as you you've heard in 5 testimony, is a standard that the IRS said that 6 you can rely on in dealing with these and 7 getting good faith opinions. Subsequently, the 8 IRS as part of an overall view of tax 9 avoidance, determined that this particular 10 transaction that Mr. Yung engaged in did not 11 avoid taxes and, in fact, it was tax 12 liabilities, penalties, and interest. Mr. Yung 13 paid those. Mr. Yung then has sought his 14 remedy with those who gave him. Advice and 15 importantly to you, I think, when offered the 16 opportunity to settle for a substantial sum of 17 money did not accept a condition which would 18 have prevented him from speaking publicly about 19 the circumstances. He would not sign a secrecy 20 agreement. I think that tells you something 21 about Mr. Yung's character. 22 He's given you his assurances under 23 oath. You have seen him. You know what he has 24 built. I submit to you that all of this 25 evidence indicates that whether or not he may 0066 1 have made a mistake here or there in certain 2 personnel decisions he made, all of the 3 assurances you have, all the evidence 4 demonstrate beyond any shadow of a doubt that 5 he possesses the character necessary to be a 6 participant in this industry in New Jersey, as 7 does Mr. Preston, Ms. More, Mr. Giannantonio. 8 This hearing has been the subject of a 9 lot of talk. It's been the subject of a lot of 10 reporting. It's been the subject of a lot of 11 repetition of issues that are in documents that 12 are before you. Much of that titillates the 13 public interest, to some degree may sell 14 newspapers. But I submit to you that what 15 this, in fact, is about are those four C's: 16 Competent, compliance, character, and cash. 17 Financial stability. 18 You'll decide this case based upon all 19 the evidence you heard. You always have, and I 20 submit to you that what you've heard 21 demonstrates to you not only are Mr. Yung, 22 Tropicana Entertainment worthy of plenary 23 qualification, but they've demonstrated that 24 they've met the standard for renewal of their 25 casino license for the period permitted by the 0067 1 Act. 2 Thank you very much. 3 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. 4 While it has been indicated by both the 5 parties, all the parties today, we have taken 6 over two weeks of testimony. We have had 7 hundreds of exhibits. Obviously, this is a 8 very long and detailed record for the 9 Commission to consider. Having received all 10 these things and having received all these 11 exhibits, I'll declare now that the record is 12 closed. 13 Let me thank the Division of Gaming 14 Enforcement and their agents for their hard 15 work and the work of Acting Director Maher on 16 this issue. Thank Mr. O'Gara, thank Miss 17 Hertzig for her input, and especially thank my 18 staff, my General Counsel, Dianna Fauntleroy, 19 and especially Mr. Ingis and Mr. DiGiacomo for 20 the efforts that they have put into this. 21 As I said, this record is quite 22 extensive. The Commission will need time to 23 digest that and the transcripts. 24 Accordingly, we plan to issue a decision 25 in this matter at our next regularly scheduled 0068 1 public meeting, which is Wednesday, December 2 the 12th. The meeting starts at 10:30. It 3 will be an item on the agenda. 4 Having said this, is there any other 5 procedural matters that need to be brought to 6 our attention at this time? 7 Yes, Ms. Maher? 8 MS. MAHER: Yes, Chair. I did reference 9 in my closing argument that the proposed 10 conditions, if I may submit those now. 11 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. Yes. 12 MR. O'GARA: Thank you. 13 MS. MAHER: You're welcome. 14 Thank you. 15 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. 16 Any other procedure matters? 17 MR. O'GARA: No. I would just -- I've 18 never seen Miss Maher's conditions. I have no 19 doubt that they are well thought out. If I 20 have any response, I'll submit it to her and a 21 copy to you in writing. 22 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. 23 Mr. DiGiacomo? 24 MR. DiGIACOMO: Yeah, Chair, 25 Commissioners. For the record, it probably 0069 1 will be best to mark this as a Division exhibit 2 and then move it in. 3 What's the next number, Mr. Nance? 4 MR. NANCE: D-68. 5 MR. DiGIACOMO: If that's acceptable to 6 the parties? 7 MS. MAHER: Yes. 8 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Marked as D-68. 9 Any objection? 10 MR. O'GARA: No problem. 11 CHAIR KASSEKERT: All right. 12 Accordingly, I'll move that into evidence as 13 well, and make the record a little bit bigger. 14 (Laughter.) 15 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Thank you. 16 Having said all that, I'll entertain a 17 motion to adjourn. 18 COMMISSIONER SOMMELING: Motion to 19 adjourned. 20 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Is there a second? 21 COMMISSIONER FRULIO: Second. 22 CHAIR KASSEKERT: The motion has been 23 made and seconded. All in favor? 24 (Ayes.) 25 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Opposed? 0070 1 (No response.) 2 CHAIR KASSEKERT: Motion carries. 3 Thank you. 4 (The Special Meeting was adjourned at 5 2:40 p.m.) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0071 1 2 C E R T I F I C A T E 3 4 5 I, DARLENE SILLITOE, a Certified Court 6 Reporter and Notary Public of the State of New 7 Jersey, certify that the foregoing is a true 8 and accurate transcript of the proceedings. 9 10 11 I further certify that I am neither 12 attorney, of counsel for, nor related to or 13 employed by any of the parties to the action; 14 further that I am not a relative or employee of 15 any attorney or counsel employed in this case; 16 nor am I financially interested in the action. 17 18 19 DARLENE SILLITOE CCR 20 License No XI01023 21 22 Dated: December 4, 2007 23 My Commission Expires on July 10, 2009 24 ID No 2062871 25