|
Requirement & Regulatory Citation |
| Did
document indicate that the shipment contained
oil?.[49 CFR Part 130.11(a)] |
| Was
document readily available indicating that
the shipment contained oil?.[49 CFR Part 130.11(b)] |
| Was
there a release of oil from a package?.[49
CFR Part 130.21] |
| Did
the oil transporter have a current basic discharge
plan?.[49 CFR Part 130.31(a)] |
| Did
the carrier implement a response plan?.[49
CFR Part 130.33] |
| Was
a person, who offered or accepted a hazardous
material, registered with the Federal DOT
or did they offer or accept an improperly
prepared package?.[49 CFR Part 171.2(a)] |
| Was
transporter registered with the Federal DOT
or did they properly handle or transport hazardous
materials?.[49 CFR Part 171.2(b)] |
| Was
container improperly represented that it met
the requirements of 49 C.F.R.?.[49 CFR Part
171.2(f)(1)] |
| Did
a person misrepresent that a hazardous material
was present in a package, container or motor
vehicle?.[49 CFR Part 171.2(f)(2)] |
| Did
anyone tamper with a marking, label, placard,
or description on a document?.[49 CFR Part
171.2(g)(1)] |
| Did
anyone tamper with a package, container, or
motor vehicle used to trasport hazardous materials?.[49
CFR Part 171.2(g)(2)] |
| Did
the carrier mark motor vehicle in accordance
with 390.21 or 1058.2?.[49 CFR Part 171.3(b)(1)] |
| Did
the carrier give immediate notice of incident
by telephone to Federal DOT?.[49 CFR Part
171.15] |
| Did
the carrier submit a written report to Federal
DOT within 30 days of incident?.[49 CFR Part
171.16(a)] |
| Did
the carrier retain copy of incident report
for 2 years?.[49 CFR Part 171.16(b)] |
| Did
the shipper describe the hazardous material
on the shipping paper?.[49 CFR Part 172.200(a)] |
| Did
the shipper use a proper description on the
shipping paper?.[49 CFR Part 172.201(a)(1-4)] |
| Did
the shipper properly number continuation pages
and did the first page specify the total number
of pages?.[49 CFR Part 172.201(c)] |
| Did
the shipper include as part of the shipping
description the proper shipping name, hazard
class or division, ID#, packing group and
total quantity?.[49 CFR Part 172.202(a)(1-5)] |
| Did
the shipper show the shipping description
in the proper sequence?.[49 CFR Part 172.202(b)] |
| Did
the shipper list the total quantity before
or after, or both before and after the basic
description?.[49 CFR Part 172.202(c)] |
| Did
the shipper offer or carrier transport a material
that is not a hazardous material with a hazard
class or ID# in the shipping description?.[49
CFR Part 172.202(e)] |
| Did
the shipper enter "DOT-E" followed by an exemption
number on the shipping paper?.[49 CFR Part
172.203(a)] |
| Did
the shipper enter the name of the hazardous
substance or hazardous waste code in the shipping
description when the proper shipping name
does not identify the hazardous substance
by name?.[49 CFR Part 172.203(c)(1)] |
| Did
the shipper enter the letters "RQ" on the
shipping paper?.[49 CFR Part 172.203(c)(2)] |
| Did
the shipper enter the technical names of the
hazardous materials in the shipping description
for n.o.s. or other generic descriptions?.[49
CFR Part 172.203(k)] |
| Did
the shipper enter the name of the component
which makes a material a marine pollutant
in the shipping description or enter the words
"Marine Pollutant"?.[49 CFR Part 172.203(l)] |
| Did
the shipper enter the proper information in
the shipping description for poisonous materials?.[49
CFR Part 172.203(m)] |
| Did
the carrier properly prepare a hazardous waste
manifest?.[49 CFR Part 172.205(a)] |
| Did
the shipper (generator) properly prepare a
hazardous waste manifest?.[49 CFR Part 172.205(b)] |
| Did
the shipper (generator) and the intial carrier,
date and sign the hazardous waste manifest?
.[49 CFR Part 172.205(c)] |
| Did
each subsequent carrier and the designated
facility, date and sign the hazardous waste
manifest? .[49 CFR Part 172.205(d)] |
| Did
the shipper properly mark each package, freight
container, or transport vehicle?.[49 CFR Part
172.300(a)] |
| Did
the carrrier properly mark each package, freight
container, or transport vehicle?.[49 CFR Part
172.300(b)] |
| Did
the shipper mark non-bulk packaging with the
proper shipping name and ID#?.[49 CFR Part
172.301(a)(1)] |
| Did
shipper of a single hazardous material in
non-bulk packages in a transport vehicle or
freight container mark each side and end with
the ID# and each individual package with the
same proper shipping name and ID#?.[49 CFR
Part 172.301(a)(3)] |
| Did
the shipper mark non-bulk packaging subject
to 172.203 with the technical name of the
hazardous material?.[49 CFR Part 172.301(b)] |
| Did
the shipper mark the outside of a non-bulk
package, authorized by an exemption, with
?DOT-E? followed by exemption number?.[49
CFR Part 172.301(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier properly mark bulk
packaging with the ID#?.[49 CFR Part 172.302(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier display markings of
proper size on bulk packagings?.[49 CFR Part
172.302(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier mark the outside of
a bulk package, authorized by an exemption,
with ?DOT-E? followed by exemption number?.[49
CFR Part 172.302(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier maintain marking on
bulk packaging when emptied?.[49 CFR Part
172.302(d)] |
| Did
the shipper offer or carrier transport a package
that did not contain the hazardous material
marked on the package?.[49 CFR Part 172.303(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier meet the marking requirements?.[49
CFR Part 172.304(a)(1-4)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use only authorized
abbreviations?.[49 CFR Part 172.308(a)] |
| Did
the shipper of non-bulk combination package
with inner packagings containing liquid hazardous
material pack with closures upward and with
package orientation markings?.[49 CFR Part
172.312(a)] |
| Did
the shipper display arrows for purposes other
than to indicate proper package orientation
on a non-bulk package containing liquid hazardous
material?.[49 CFR Part 172.312(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier mark packaging containing
a material poisonous by inhalation with ?Inhalation
Hazard? (marking must be on 2 opposing sides
of a bulk packaging)?.[49 CFR Part 172.313(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier permanently mark non-bulk
plastic outer packaging used as a single or
composite packaging for Division 6.1 materials
with ?POISON? in letters at least 6.3 mm high?.[49
CFR Part 172.313(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier of a material poisonous
by inhalation in non-bulk packages in a transport
vehicle or freight container mark each side
and end with the ID# and each individual package
with the same proper shipping name and ID#?.[49
CFR Part 172.313(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier mark non-bulk packaging
with the ORM-D designation on at least one
side or end within a rectangle that is approximately
6.3mm larger on each side than the designation?.[49
CFR Part 172.316(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier properly mark bulk
packaging with the MARINE POLLUTANT mark?.[49
CFR Part 172.322(b)(1-2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier properly mark a transport
vehicle or freight container used to transport
a package containing a marine pollutant with
the MARINE POLLUTANT mark?.[49 CFR Part 172.322(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use the proper MARINE
POLLUTANT mark?.[49 CFR Part 172.322(e)] |
| Did
the shipper mark non-bulk packaging with the
name of the hazardous substance or hazardous
waste code when not identified by name?.[49
CFR Part 172.324(a)] |
| Did
the shipper mark the letters ?RQ? on a non-bulk
package containing a hazardous substance?.[49
CFR Part 172.324(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier mark a portable tank
on 2 opposing sides with the proper shipping
name?.[49 CFR Part 172.326(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier display the name of
the owner or lessee on a portable tank?.[49
CFR Part 172.326(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier mark a transport vehicle
or freight container used to transport a portable
tank with ID# if not visible on portable tank?.[49
CFR Part 172.326(c)(1)] |
| Did
the shipper of a portable tank in a transport
vehicle or freight container provide ID# markings
to motor carrier if not visible on portable
tank?.[49 CFR Part 172.326(c)(2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier provide, affix, or
mark the ID# on a cargo tank or on the transport
vehicle or freight container if not visible
on cargo tank?.[49 CFR Part 172.328(a)(1-3)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier provide, affix, or
mark the ID# on bulk packaging other than
portable tanks or cargo tanks or on the transport
vehicle or freight container if not visible
on bulk packaging?.[49 CFR Part 172.331(a-c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier properly display ID#
on placard?.[49 CFR Part 172.332(c-d)] |
| Did
anyone display an ID# in a prohibited manner?.[49
CFR Part 172.334(a-g)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier, displaying ID#s on
transport vehicle or freight container that
are not required or prohibited, display proper
ID#s?.[49 CFR Part 172.336(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier properly display ID#
on plain white square-on-point configuration?.[49
CFR Part 172.336(b)] |
| Did
the carrier replace missing or damaged ID#
as soon as practical or to properly enter
ID# when done by hand?.[49 CFR Part 172.338] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier properly label packages
or containment devices?.[49 CFR Part 172.400(a)] |
| Did
a shipper or carrier label a package that
did not contain a hazardous material or without
representing the hazard of the material?.[49
CFR Part 172.401(a)] |
| Did
a shipper or carrier mark or label a package
that could be confused with or conflicts with
a label prescribed by 172?.[49 CFR Part 172.401(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier label packages with
primary and subsidiary hazard labels?.[49
CFR Part 172.402(a)(1-2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier display the hazard
class or division # in lower corner of primary
label?.[49 CFR Part 172.402(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use label for each
hazard class when hazardous materials having
different classes are packed within the same
packaging?.[49 CFR Part 172.404(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use label for each
hazard class when two or more packages containing
compatible hazardous material are placed within
the same outside container or overpack?.[49
CFR Part 172.404(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier place label in the
proper location on the package or containment
device?.[49 CFR Part 172.406(a)(1-2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier place primary and subsidiary
hazard labels within 6 inches of one another?.[49
CFR Part 172.406(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier place label on a background
of contrasting color or have a dotted or solid
line outer border?.[49 CFR Part 172.406(d)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier place duplicate labels
on at least 2 sides?.[49 CFR Part 172.406(e)] |
| Is
the label clearly visible and not obscured
by markings or attachments?.[49 CFR Part 172.406(f)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use a durable and weather
resistant label?.[49 CFR Part 172.407(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use a label design
as shown in 172.411-172.448?.[49 CFR Part
172.407(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use a label, or numerals
or text on a label, of proper size?.[49 CFR
Part 172.407(c)(1-5)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use the proper colors
on a label?.[49 CFR Part 172.407(d)(1-5)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier display prohibited
placarding?.[49 CFR Part 172.502(a)(1-2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier, displaying placards
that are not required, display proper placards?.[49
CFR Part 172.502(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier display proper placards?.[49
CFR Part 172.504(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use the DANGEROUS placard
properly?.[49 CFR Part 172.504(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier display POISON INHALATION
HAZARD or POISON GAS placard, in addition
to other placards required?.[49 CFR Part 172.505(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier display DANGEROUS WHEN
WET placard, in addition to other placards
required?.[49 CFR Part 172.505(c)] |
| Did
the shipper provide motor carrier with the
required placards prior to or at the same
time the material is offered for transportation?.[49
CFR Part 172.506(a)] |
| Did
the carrier transport hazardous material without
proper placarding?.[49 CFR Part 172.506(a)(1)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier affix the required
placards to a freight container having a capacity
of 640 cu.ft?.[49 CFR Part 172.512(a)] |
| Did
the shipper affix the required placards to
a bulk packaging?.[49 CFR Part 172.514(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier maintain placarding
on bulk packaging when emptied?.[49 CFR Part
172.514(b)] |
| Was
the placard readily visible from the direction
it faces?.[49 CFR Part 172.516(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier meet the placard visibility
and display requirements?.[49 CFR Part 172.516(c)(1-6)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier ensure that placard
holder does not obscure placard surface other
than the borders?.[49 CFR Part 172.516(d)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier meet the placard strength
and durability requirements?.[49 CFR Part
172.519(a)(1-3)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use a placard design
as shown in 172.521-172.560?.[49 CFR Part
172.519(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use a placard, or numerals
or text on a placard, of proper size?.[49
CFR Part 172.519(c)(1-3)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use the proper colors
on a placard?.[49 CFR Part 172.519(d)(1-4)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier have emergency response
information immediately available?.[49 CFR
Part 172.600(c)] |
| Did
the emergency response information contain
all required information?.[49 CFR Part 172.602(a)(1-7)] |
| Was
the emergency response information printed
legibly in English, available for use away
from the package, or presented on a shipping
paper?.[49 CFR Part 172.602(b)] |
| Did
the carrier properly maintain emergency response
information?.[49 CFR Part 172.602(c)(1)] |
| Did
the facility operator properly maintain emergency
response information?.[49 CFR Part 172.602(c)(2)] |
| Did
the shipper provide a 24-hour emergency response
telephone number?.[49 CFR Part 172.604(a)] |
| Did
the shipper ensure emergency response telephone
number is monitored at all times the hazardous
material is in transportation?.[49 CFR Part
172.604(a)(1)] |
| Did
the shipper ensure emergency response telephone
number is the number of a person who is either
knowledgeable of the hazardous material or
has immediate access to a person who possesses
such knowledge?.[49 CFR Part 172.604(a)(2)] |
| Did
the shipper enter the emergency response telephone
number on the shipping paper as required?.[49
CFR Part 172.604(a)(3)] |
| Was
the emergency response telephone number that
of the person offering the hazardous material
for transportation or of an agency accepting
responsibility that has received current information
on the material?.[49 CFR Part 172.604(b)] |
| Did
the carrier instruct the driver to contact
the carrier in the event of an incident?.[49
CFR Part 172.606(a)] |
| Did
the carrier transporting by highway mark transport
vehicle with its telephone number when parked
at a separate location from its motive power?.[49
CFR Part 172.606(b)(1)] |
| Did
the carrier transporting by highway have the
shipping paper and emergency response information
available on the transport vehicle when parked
at a separate location from its motive power?.[49
CFR Part 172.606(b)(2)] |
| Did
the hazmat employer train each of its hazmat
employees?.[49 CFR Part 172.702(a)] |
| Did
the hazmat employer provide training that
applies to a particular function before being
performed by a hazmat employee?.[49 CFR Part
172.702(b)] |
| Did
the hazmat employer test each of its hazmat
employees by appropriate means on the training
subjects?.[49 CFR Part 172.702(d)] |
| Did
the hazmat employee training include general
awareness/familiarization training?.[49 CFR
Part 172.704(a)(1)] |
| Did
the hazmat employee training include function-specific
training?.[49 CFR Part 172.704(a)(2)] |
| Did
the hazmat employee training include safety
training?.[49 CFR Part 172.704(a)(3)] |
| Did
the new hazmat employee, or a hazmat employee
who changes job functions, receive initial
training?.[49 CFR Part 172.704(c)(1)] |
| Did
the hazmat employee receive the required training
at least once every 3 years?.[49 CFR Part
172.704(c)(2)] |
| Did
the hazmat employer create and retain a record
of current training, inclusive of the preceding
3 years, for 90 days after an employee is
no longer employed by that employer as a hazmat
employee?.[49 CFR Part 172.704(d)(1-4)] |
| Did
the shipper class material according to the
highest applicable hazard class?.[49 CFR Part
173.2a(a)] |
| Did
the shipper properly use a salvage drum for
packages of hazardous materials that are damaged,
defective, or found leaking?.[49 CFR Part
173.3(c)(1-7)] |
| Did
the shipper comply with packaging requirements
for lab packs?.[49 CFR Part 173.12(b)(1-3)] |
| Did
the shipper properly reuse a packaging for
the shipment of hazardous waste?.[49 CFR Part
173.12(c)(1-5)] |
| Did
the shipper of liquid hazardous material excepted
from labeling and placarding requirements
comply with packaging requirements?.[49 CFR
Part 173.13(c)(1)] |
| Did
the shipper of solid hazardous material excepted
from labeling and placarding requirements
comply with packaging requirements?.[49 CFR
Part 173.13(c)(2)] |
| Did
the shipper mark package of hazardous material
excepted from labeling and placarding requirements
with the statement: ?This package conforms
to 49 C.F.R. 173.13??.[49 CFR Part 173.13(d)] |
| Did
anyone offer for transportation or transport
forbidden materials or packages?.[49 CFR Part
173.21(a,c,e)] |
| Did
the shipper use a proper packaging or container?.[49
CFR Part 173.22(a)(1-4)] |
| Was
the shipper, using a packaging authorized
under an exemption, the holder of or a party
to the exemption?.[49 CFR Part 173.22a(a)] |
| Did
the shipper maintain a copy of the exemption
at each facility where the packaging is being
used in connection with the shipment or transportation
of the hazardous material?.[49 CFR Part 173.22a(b)] |
| Did
the shipper furnish a copy of the exemption
to the carrier when it contains requirements
that apply to the carrier?.[49 CFR Part 173.22a(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier meet the general requirements
for packages?.[49 CFR Part 173.24(b)(1-3)] |
| Did
the shipper ensure that the packaging is compatible
with its contents?.[49 CFR Part 173.24(e)(1,2,4,5)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use properly designed
closures on packagings?.[49 CFR Part 173.24(f)(1-2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier leave sufficient outage
when filling packages with liquids?.[49 CFR
Part 173.24(h)(1)] |
| Did
the shipper of non-bulk packagings and packages
meet design requirements?.[49 CFR Part 173.24a(a)(1-5)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier ensure that no hazardous
material remains on the outside of a non-bulk
package after filling?.[49 CFR Part 173.24a(b)(5)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier load liquids in bulk
packagings so that the outage is at least
5% for materials poisonous by inhalation,
or at least 1% for all other materials, of
the total capacity?.[49 CFR Part 173.24b(a)] |
| Did
the shipper use a properly prepared overpack?.[49
CFR Part 173.25(a)(1-5)] |
| Did
the shipper inspect packaging or receptacle
before reusing to ensure it conforms to the
requirements of 171-180?.[49 CFR Part 173.28(a)] |
| Did
the shipper properly reuse a non-bulk packaging?.[49
CFR Part 173.28(b)(1,3)] |
| Did
the shipper reuse a package marked as NRC
for material required to be shipped in a DOT
specification or UN standard packaging?.[49
CFR Part 173.28(e)] |
| Did
anyone offer for transportation or transport
empty packaging containing residue of a hazardous
material in the same manner as when it previously
contained a greater quantity?.[49 CFR Part
173.29(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use a portable tank
that conforms to the requirements for the
particular hazardous material being transported
or to retain a manufacturer?s data report
while it is used for such service?.[49 CFR
Part 173.32(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier test a special portable
tank?.[49 CFR Part 173.32(f)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier retest a deteriorated
portable tank (significant dents, corroded
areas, leakage, or other conditions that indicate
weakness)?.[49 CFR Part 173.32(g)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier retest a portable tank
that has been in an accident and has been
damaged to an extent that may adversely affect
its product retention capability?.[49 CFR
Part 173.32(h)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier successfully test a
portable tank that has not been used to transport
hazardous material for 1 year or more prior
to returning to service?.[49 CFR Part 173.32(i)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier ensure that all materials
of construction used in a portable tank container
and its appurtenances are not subject to destructive
attack by its contents?.[49 CFR Part 173.32(m)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier conduct periodic hydrostatic
test of IM portable tank or periodic test
of pressure-relief valves?.[49 CFR Part 173.32b(a)(1-2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier conduct periodic visual
inspection of IM portable tank?.[49 CFR Part
173.32b(b)(1-7)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier properly mark the IM
portable tank with the required test information?.[49
CFR Part 173.32b(d)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier inspect or retest a
damaged or deteriorated IM portable tank (corroded
areas, leakage, or other conditions that indicate
weakness)?.[49 CFR Part 173.32b(e)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier retain proper written
records of test information, including visual
inspections?.[49 CFR Part 173.32b(f)] |
| Did
anyone offer a hazardous material for transportation
in an unauthorized IM portable tank?.[49 CFR
Part 173.32c(a)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use a proper IM portable
tank?.[49 CFR Part 173.32c(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier conduct the required
retests or reinspections when they become
due prior to filling or offering for shipment
an IM portable tank?.[49 CFR Part 173.32c(c)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier ensure that any part
of IM portable tank or its appurtenances are
not subject to destructive attack by its contents?.[49
CFR Part 173.32c(e)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier load an IM portable
tank to a gross weight greater than the maximum
allowable gross weight specified on its identification
plate?.[49 CFR Part 173.32c(i)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier load an IM portable
tank entirely within the horizontal outline
thereof?.[49 CFR Part 173.32c(m)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use an authorized cargo
tank motor vehicle?.[49 CFR Part 173.33(a)(1-3)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier meet cargo tank loading
requirements?.[49 CFR Part 173.33(b)(1-4)] |
| Did
the carrier drain piping on DOT specification
cargo tanks of any material that is a Division
6.1 material, oxidizer liquid, liquid organic
peroxide, or corrosive liquid (skin only)
prior to transporting?.[49 CFR Part 173.33(e)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier use an authorized intermediate
bulk container?.[49 CFR Part 173.35(a)] |
| Did
the shipper visually inspect each intermediate
bulk container and its service equipment before
filling?.[49 CFR Part 173.35(b)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier filling intermediate
bulk container with liquids ensure that it
is not filled to more than 98% of its water
capacity?.[49 CFR Part 173.35(d)] |
| Did
the carrier ensure that no hazardous material
remains on the outside of the intermediate
bulk container during transportation?.[49
CFR Part 173.35(f)(1)] |
| Did
the carrier ensure that each intermediate
bulk container is securely fastened or contained
within the transport unit during transportation?.[49
CFR Part 173.35(f)(2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier ensure that each intermediate
bulk container of solids is capable of containing
the substance in the liquid state?.[49 CFR
Part 173.35(g)] |
| Did
the shipper use only metal, rigid plastic,
or composite intermediate bulk containers
for liquid hazardous material?.[49 CFR Part
173.35(h)(1-2)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier fill an intermediate
bulk container with a Packing Group I liquid
or exceed the capacity for a Packing Group
I solid?.[49 CFR Part 173.35(j)] |
| Did
the shipper or carrier take measures to prevent
an electrostatic discharge during loading
and unloading of liquids with a flashpoint
of 141oF or lower, or powders with the potential
for dust explosion, in intermediate bulk containers?.[49
CFR Part 173.35(k)] |
