|
|

NEW JERSEY FOOD MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM
As part of the NJDEP effort to address the issues raised by the
Federal Food Quality Protection Act, the New Jersey Food Monitoring
and Evaluation Program (NJFMEP) was initiated to catalog the pesticide
residue levels present on produce being sold and consumed in New
Jersey. Sample collection began during the 2000 growing season.
Since then, over 350 samples have been collected from roadside
markets throughout the State. While the majority of the commodities
collected were grown in NJ, the program does not ignore commodities
that were grown in another state or country and sold to NJ consumers.
The commodities examined include apples, asparagus, blueberries,
broccoli, cauliflower, cherries, Chinese vegetables, cucumbers,
eggplant, lettuce, onions, peas, peaches, peppers, potatoes (white
and sweet), spinach, squash, strawberries, sweet corn and tomatoes.
With its growing popularity, organic produce is also including
in the program. Each sample collected is analyzed for over 100
different pesticide residues, including environmental contaminants
such as DDT and dieldrin. As this program continues to expand,
more commodities and sampling locations will be added to help
further ensure the quality of the fresh produce in New Jersey.
Detailed reports and analytical results are
available on the Publications
page.
PRIVATE APPLICATOR CREDIT INCENTIVE SURVEYS
In 2007, PEM developed a series of
surveys for Private Applicators. These surveys were designed
to collect information about issues and concerns regarding various
types of agriculture through out NJ. The surveys include Integrated
Pest Management (IPM), Vineyard, Nursery and Direct Marketing.
In exchange for completing a survey, the Private Applicator
received one unit of Core credit towards their pesticide license
recertification. The data from these surveys will be evaluated
and used to determine where the Pesticide Control Program can
best assist NJ's agricultural community.
A summary of the initial IPM survey is available
on the Publications
page.
GROUND WATER MONITORING NETWORK
As part of the EPA's ground water protection
initiative, a series of monitoring wells were installed (and
continue to be installed) under the direction of PEM since 1997.
Wells were placed in areas showing higher agricultural pesticide
use and are relatively shallow (20-50 feet in depth), reaching
into subsurface aquifers. Wells are sampled on a routine schedule
to obtain a data set of pesticide residue detections, the results
directing the PCP to further investigation of problem pesticides
and areas. Twenty-nine wells are currently in place in central
and south New Jersey. As of 2007, three of the twenty-nine wells
have shown consistent detections.
A detailed report of analytical results is available
on the Publications
page.
PESTCIDES IN MOSQUITO CONTROL PROJECT
The current project focus is the ground-based
application of resmethrin for adult mosquito control. The goal
of sampling is to determine the extent of the migration of the
pesticide away from the target area and the amount of residue
deposited in and around the site of application. We also are
attempting to determine how long the pesticide remains suspended
in the air column after an application. Movement of the applied
pesticide through wooded canopies and wide-open areas has been
examined utilizing various sampling matrices including water,
surface wipes and filter paper.
PEM is currently working with Mercer county
Division of Mosquito Control to monitor their routine ground-based
ULV resmethrin applications. The current study site provides
a wide range of sampling opportunities including ground and
suspended (hanging) samples, wooded areas, open fields, and
surface water. This work, coupled with previous work with the
Bergen County Mosquito Control Program, leads PEM to believe
that humidity plays a significant role in the deposition of
resmethrin after an application. PEM will continue to investigate
the impact of meteorological conditions on mosquito control
applications in the coming years.
DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION OF CLEAN-UP PROCEDURES
In the course of investigations, the PCP frequently
provides clean-up recommendations in a variety of settings.
When initial cleanups fail to significantly lower the residue
levels, the suppositions are that either the cleanup was not
performed, despite the documentation, as per the recommendations
or that the clean up recommendations themselves are not effective.
In particular, several times over the past few years, PCP investigators
have encountered Fipronil spills and/or misapplications that
appear to be resistant to cleanup efforts. Over the winter of
2006, experiments were conducted in controlled settings that
demonstrated effective cleanup methods. Subsequently, PEM developed
cleanup procedures and recommendations based on these experiments.
PEM is currently coordinating with PCP investigators to provide
recommendations to the responsible parties and observe and document
the spill cleanup. Post-cleanup samples will be collected to
provide further documentation of the effectiveness of the clean
up procedures to lower residue levels. PEM will expand this
effort to encompass a wider range of pesticides and settings
over the coming years.
DCPA (DACTHAL) INVESTIGATION IN SOUTHERN NJ
Samples collected in 2005 from groundwater monitoring
wells and migrant farm camps in the Vineland area revealed significant
levels of the herbicide DCPA. Several of the samples were found
to be well above the Health Advisory Level (HAL) established
for DCPA in drinking water. Over the course of 2006, samples
were collected from additional migrant camps, groundwater wells
and surface water sites in the vicinity of the original detections.
While none of the samples and subsequent detections approached
the levels found in 2005, PEM expanded the scope of the monitoring
to identify the extent of the contamination. In 2007, surface
water sampling sites were identified in eleven townships reporting
DCPA use. While there were some detections, none of them exceeded
the HAL. Based on all of the data collected, it appears that
the presence of DCPA is localized in the Vineland area and is
the result of routine agricultural use. PEM will continue to
monitor this area.
|