Governor Chris Christie • Lt.Governor Kim Guadagno
  Search
new jersey department of environmental protection
NJ Home Page Services A to Z NJ FAQs NJ Departments/Agencies departments
site remediation program

SRP Home | DEP Home

Guidance DocumentsSediment Quality Evaluations

 

Guidance For Sediment Quality Evaluations
November 1998

1.0 Introduction

The purpose of this document is to establish practical guidance for the evaluation of sediment quality to be used in the ecological risk assessment process associated with contaminated sites under the jurisdiction of the Site Remediation Program (SRP) in the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Presented are procedures and references that form a framework for qualitative and quantitative determinations of actual or potential adverse ecological effects and provide the basis for remedial decision-making and evaluation of injury to natural resources in sediment media. The information presented in this document is based on State and Federal regulations and guidances, in particular Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA 540-R-97-006) and Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume II, Environmental Evaluation Manual (EPA/540/1-89/001). It is intended to be consistent with, and supplementary to, the Technical Requirements for Site Remediation, N.J.A.C. 7:26E. References are presented at the end of each major section for ease of use.

In accordance with N.J.A.C. 7:26E-3.8 (b), the collection of sediment samples is required when it is evident that a discharge to a surface water body has occurred pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:26E-3.8 (a). Successful evaluation and risk management of contaminated sediments requires knowledge of the nature, concentration and areal extent of contamination, as well as site-specific variables that affect the expression of environmental impacts. There are three components of a complete assessment of sediment quality:

(1) measurement of contaminant concentration, via standard or special analytical laboratory procedures;

(2) measurement of toxicity and bioavailability, via tissue analysis, sediment toxicity testing, etc.; and

(3) assessment of resident biota, via community bioassessment/survey procedures.

These three components, measured at potentially site-impacted and reference locations, provide complementary data, because no single component can be used to predict the measurement of the other components. For example, sediment chemistry provides information on the identification and extent of contamination but not on biological effects. Sediment toxicity testing provides direct evidence of sediment toxicity but cannot discriminate among contaminants nor predict actual in-situ responses. In-situ responses of resident biota, measured by in-fauna community surveys can provide direct evidence of contaminant-related effects, but only if confounding effects unrelated to contamination can be excluded, such as differences in habitat quality. Thus, a sediment evaluation program must be based on this "triad" approach to provide a weight of evidence for determining if adverse effects are occurring, and if so, whether they are due to the site in question.

For sediment quality evaluations at SRP sites, this "triad" investigation is accomplished pursuant to the tiered approach described in N.J.A.C. 7:26E-3.11 and 4.7. In the Baseline Ecological Evaluation (BEE), the site is examined for the co-occurrence of chemicals of potential ecological concern, environmentally sensitive areas, and complete chemical migration pathways, to assess the potential for ecological risk. If this initial evaluation indicates the potential for adverse ecological effects, a subsequent, more rigorous evaluation will be required for the full Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) to further characterize risk.

References

  • N.J.A.C. 7:26E. Technical Requirements for Site Remediation.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. March, 1989. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund, volume II, environmental evaluation manual. EPA/540/1-89/001. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Washington.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. June, 1997. Ecological risk assessment guidance for Superfund, process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments. EPA 540-R-97-006. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington.

 

Sections