School Ethics Commission Decisions
|Search | Arbitrator TEACHNJ | Commissioner | State Board | School Ethics | Board of Examiners | Charter School Tenure | OAL|
The following list is in chronological order. If you know the name of a particular case you are looking for, or of any party it involves, use the "Find" feature of the "Edit" menu to search the list.
The decisions are in Adobe PDF format. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader version 3.0 or higher to view them. Be sure to read the instructions that come with the reader carefully for information on viewing and printing documents.
School Ethics Commission Decisions
Public Advisory Opinions
|A01-98||Board members may discuss and vote on a proposal to give greater weight to certain courses, but may not vote on whether to make proposal retroactive when retroactivity would give their children who are juniors a greater benefit.||2/24/98|
|A04-98||Board president may request a letter of recommendation from the district superintendent without violating the Act, but may wish to reconsider doing so due to other considerations.||4/28/98|
|A22-98||Two Board members who are either members of the NJEA or have spouses who are members of the NJEA may participate in the hearing on a teachers grievance alleging that the number of students that she has been assigned is impacting on her workload without violating N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24(c) of the School Ethics Act. However, the one Board member who has a daughter who teaches in the district would violate the act if he were to participate in the hearing of the grievance.||2/23/99
|A15-99||Board attorneys, who are not employees of school districts who make recommendations regarding hiring or the purchase of property or services, are not "school officials" subject to the School Ethics Act.||11/23/99|
Board member would violate N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24(c) of the Act if she were to participate in discussions and vote on the reappointment of the Board attorney or the payment of the attorney's bills when the attorney prepared a simple will and powers of attorney for the Board member and her spouse.
Board members who have immediate family members who are employed in a school district that receives the Board's students would violate N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24(c) of the Act if they were to vote to approve the tuition contract with the receiving school district for the Board's students to attend the receiving school district.
Commission advised that a school offiicial would violate N.J.S.A.
18A:12-24(e) of the School Ethics Act if he were to accept funding
from a District vendor that consisted of travel, meals and accommodations
to an educational event that the vendor sponsors, even if the
school official were serving as a presenter.
|A28-04||Board member whose spouse is employed as a teacher in the school district would not violate the Act by receiving medical benefits through the district for which he serves. He must abstain from all matters involving the local teachers association and all issues related to the employment of his spouse.||9/30/04|
|A30-04||Board member would not violate the Act by appealing a Section 504 determination regarding her child and pursuing tuition and legal fees because N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24(j) provides an exception. However, she would violate N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24(c) if she were to participate in discussions and vote on matters involving the Section 504 determination.||12/21/04|
|A15-10||A board member’s participation in an exit interview would violate N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24.1(c) and (d) of the Code of Ethics for School Board Members.||2/14/11|