Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
IDEA 2004 Implementation
2
Overview of Implementation Process
  • Purpose of the Guidance Memo
    •  Sets Forth What Districts Must Do as     of July 1, 2005
    •  No Policy Determinations
    •  If NJ Rules are Superceded, the New  Provisions are Set Forth in the Memo
    • If NJ Rules are Not Superceded, They are Generally Not Part of the Memo




3
Overview (continued)
  •  Key Provisions Where NJ Rules are Not Superceded are Discussed in the Memo to Avoid Confusion.  These Include:
    • Amendment of IEP
    • Excusal from Meetings
    • Objectives and Benchmarks
    • Transition
4
Overview (continued)
  • Rulemaking Process:
    • Analyzing Input
    • First Discussion and Pre-Proposal in October
    • Completion Date June 2006
    • Policy Determinations Will be Made Here
      • All Parts of the Regulations are Being Reviewed
      • 2 Comment Periods Plus Input From Variety of Sources (Districts, Organizations, Parents and Parent Advocacy Groups)


5
Overview (continued)
  • Categories of Provisions Of IDEA 2004 For Rulemaking Purposes
    • Areas Where State Rules Conflict With IDEA 2004
      • Rules Must Be Changed
    • Areas Where State Rules Exceed or Provide Additional Protections/Services
      • Rules Can Be Retained or Amended
    • Areas Where There is No Federal Provision
      • Can Amend as Deemed Appropriate
      • e.g.  Programs and Instruction
6
Overview (continued)
  • The Department Has Requested Input With Respect to All Areas In IDEA 2004 Including:
    • Excusal From Meetings
    • Amendment of IEPs Without A Meeting
    • Short-Term Objectives/Benchmarks
    • Paperwork Reduction Pilot
    • 3 Year IEP Pilot
    • Regulatory Barriers to Inclusive Education
7
Overview (continued)
  • Notice of Proposed Rule Making from USDOE
    • Published June 21, 2005
    • Proposed Changes Only
    • Cannot Rely on or Follow Them Now
    • Indicates How USDOE MIGHT Interpret Certain Parts of IDEA in Final Rules in December
    • Can be Found at: www.regulations.gov/AGCY_EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT.cfm
    • Comments On the Proposed Regulations are Due September 6, 2005

8
Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements
  • Effective December 3, 2004
  • Requirements For Special Education Teachers
      • Full State Certification
      • No Licensure Requirements Waived on Emergency, Temporary or Provisional Basis
9
Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements (Continued)
  • Teaching To Alternate Standards
    • All Students Participating in APA
    • Highly Qualified Requirements
      • Elementary Level Instruction – Meet HQ Requirements for an Elementary Teacher
      • If Instruction is Above the Elementary Level – Appropriate to the Level of Instruction Being Provided

  • Teaching Multiple Subjects
    • For Veteran Teachers, Must Demonstrate Competence In ALL Core Academic Subjects in Which the Teacher is Teaching
    • For New Teachers, Must Demonstrate Competence in Math, Language or Science, and Has 2 Years From the Hire Date to Demonstrate Competence in All Other Areas in Which they are Instructing
10
Peer Reviewed Research
  • Special Education and Supplementary Aids and Services Must be Based, to the Extent Appropriate, on Peer-Reviewed Research
11
Assistive Technology
  • Medically Implanted Devices Are Excluded by IDEA 2004


12
Mandatory Medication of Students
  • Districts are Prohibited from Mandating that Students Obtain a Prescription
  • Districts can Consult and Share Observations Regarding:
    • Performance
    • Behavior
    • Need for an Evaluation
13
Surrogate Parents and Wards of the State
  • No Consent for Initial Evaluation for a Ward of the State if the Parent Cannot be Found
    • Must Appoint a Surrogate


  • Surrogate Parent Requirements:
    • Reasonable Efforts to Appoint in 30 Days
    • A Judge May Appoint a Surrogate Parent
    • Unaccompanied Homeless Youth Must Have  Surrogate Parent Appointed
14
Excusal From IEP Meetings
  • When a Parent Agrees in Writing, IDEA 2004 Permits Excusal of Team Members in Two Situations


  • When the Team Member’s Area is Not Being Discussed
    • Mandatory Provision in IDEA 2004
    • Goes Into Effect July 1, 2005


  • When the Team Member’s Area is Being Discussed
    • Permissive Area in IDEA 2004
    • NJ Regulations Exceed IDEA 2004
    • DOES NOT Go Into Effect Unless New Jersey Regulations Are Amended
15
Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
  • Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Statement
    • Replaced PLEP for IEPs Developed on or After July 1, 2005
  • Also Must Include Measurable Annual Academic and Functional Goals in IEPs Developed on or after July 1, 2005
16
Benchmarks or Short-Term Objectives
  • IDEA 2004 Permits Elimination of Benchmarks or Short-Term Objectives as a Requirement for IEPs, Except for Those for Students Participating in the APA
  • New Jersey Regulations Exceed IDEA 2004
    • Benchmarks and Short-Term Objectives Are Still Required in All IEPs, Unless New Jersey Regulations are Amended
17
Amendment of IEP Without Meeting
  • IDEA 2004 Permits Amendment of IEPs Without a Meeting if the Parent Consents
  • New Jersey Regulations Exceed IDEA 2004 in this Area and Do Not Permit Amendment of IEPs Without a Meeting
  • No Amendment of IEPs in New Jersey Unless Our Regulations Are Amended
18
Students Transitioning From Part C
  • At the Request of the Parent, the District Must Invite the Part C Services Coordinator to the Initial IEP Meeting
19
Transfer Students
  • Current Regulations: A Student Must Receive a Consistent Program Until the District:
    • Adopts the Current IEP or
    • Develops a New IEP
  • IDEA 2004: A Student Must Receive a Comparable Program Until:
    • For an In-State Transfer:
      • The District Adopts the Student’s Current IEP or Develop a New IEP
    • For an Out-of-State Transfer:
      • The District Must Develop a New IEP
  • The New Requirements are Effective for Transfers on or After July 1, 2005
  • Also, Must Promptly Seek Records for Transfer Students
20
Transition
  • IDEA 2004 Raised the Age to 16
  • New Jersey Exceeds IDEA 2004 and Requires Transition at Age 14
  • For IEPs for Students Age 16 or Older:
    • Set Forth Appropriate Measurable Post-Secondary Goals Related to Training, Education, Employment, Life Skills
  • For IEPs for Students Age 14 or Younger, Follow Standard in NJ Rules
21
Graduation or Exceeding Age of Eligibility
  • IDEA 2004 Requires a Written Summary of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
  • Also Must Provide Recommendations in Meeting the Student’s Post-Secondary Goals
22
Assessment in Appropriate Language or Form
  • Instead of “Native Language,” Assess in Language or Form Most Likely to Yield Accurate Information
  • Already Part of the NJ Definition of Native Language.  (IEP Team Determines Student’s Language)
  • IDEA 2004 Clarifies That A Student’s Language is the Language or Form Most Likely to Provide Accurate Information
23
Specific Learning Disability
  • Can Still Use Severe Discrepancy
  • IDEA 2004 Allows Districts to Choose to Use a Response to Scientifically Based Interventions (RTI) Methodology


24
Consent Provisions in IDEA 2004
  • IDEA 2004 Clarifies that a District May NOT go to Due Process to Compel Consent for Implementation of a Student’s Initial IEP
      • No Denial of FAPE
      • No Violation of Child-Find
25
Reevaluations
  • IDEA 2004
    • Not More Than 1 Time Per Year UNLESS Parent and District Agree
    • 3 Year Evaluation Can Be Waived by the District and Parent
26
Equitable Participation Services
  • District Where School Is Located Required to Provide the Services According to IDEA 2004
    • Implementing All Requirements Now Except:
      • Notified USDOE That the District of Residence Will Provide Services for the 2005-2006 School Year So Needed Data Can Be Acquired
      • Data Will Be Collected in the December 1 Count
      • Other New Requirements Are In Place Now
        • Consultation With Private Schools Located Within District
        • Appeals to State and USDOE

27
Dispute Resolution
  • Separate Guidance
  • Significant Changes to the Due Process System:
    • 2 Year Period to File
    • 90 Days to Appeal
    • Answers and Notice (10 Days)
    • Objection to Notice (15 Days, 5 to Decide)
    • Amendment (Agreement or ALJ)
28
Dispute Resolution (Continued)
  • Resolution Session
    • 30 Days (Schedule within 15)
    • Mandatory unless Agree to Mediation or Both Parties Waive it Resolution Session
    • Discussions Not Confidential
    • Legally Binding Agreement
    • 3 Days to Void Agreement
    • Enforceable in Court
  • No Due Process to Contest Whether Teacher is HQ
  • Attorney Fees for Districts (Frivolous, Harass, Delay)
  • Still Have Emergency Relief
  • Expedited Hearing in 20 School Days, Decision in 10


29
Discipline
Effective July 2005
  • Unique Circumstances
    • A district Can Consider Unique Circumstances When Deciding Whether to Impose Discipline for Violating a Code of Conduct
  • Manifestation Determination
    • Caused By, Or Was in Direct and Substantial Relationship to the Student’s Disability, or
    • Direct Result of Failure to Implement IEP
30
Discipline (Continued)
  • When Conduct is a Manifestation
      • Must Conduct Functional Behavioral Assessment
      • Develop or Review Behavior Intervention Plan


  • Special Circumstances: Can Remove a Student to an Interim Alternative Educational Setting (IAES) for 45 School Days for offenses involving:
      • Drugs
      • Weapons
      • Serious Bodily Injury (Definition Was Added Also)
    • School Days:  Any Day Students Attend School
31
Discipline (Continued)
  • Authority of Hearing Officer
    • Can Place in Interim Alternative Educational Setting for Not More Than 45 School Days for dangerousness
    • Can Seek Additional 45 Days


  • Placement During Appeals
    • IAES Until the Case is Decided or the Period of the Ordered Removal, Whichever Occurs First
32
Discipline (Continued)
  • Basis of Knowledge
    • Parent Expressed Concern in Writing
    • Parent Requested an Evaluation
    • Teacher or LEA Staff Expressed Specific Concerns