>>SPECIAL EDUCATION  >>SPPI  >>ESSEX  >>ESSEX FELLS

Public Reporting
on
State Performance Plan Indicators

Data Notes:
NA: This element is not applicable to this district for these grade levels.
-: Did not meet the state NCLB "n" size of 40 for participation and 35 for performance.
*: No reported data on December 1st collection.
**: No reported data on End Of the Year Data collection.
***: 0 students referred from Part C to part B.

Essex Fells
Essex County
Year 2005-2006
Indicator 1: Graduation Rates - Performance Indicator   Data Source: End of Year Report
Percent of youth IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma Local Data State Target Met State Target
NA 76.0% NA
 
Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rates - Performance Indicator   Data Source: End of Year Report
Percent of Youth with IEPs dropping out of high school Local Data State Target Met State Target
NA 5.0% NA
 
Indicator 3: Assessment - Performance Indicator  Data Source: Title1 (NCLB)
A. District/charter school met the State minimum "n" size meeting the State's AYP objectives for progress for the disability subgroup. Yes
 
B. Participation rate for children with IEPs in a regular assessment with no accommodations; regular assessment with accommodations; alternate assessment against grade level standards; alternate assessment against alternate achievement standards
Grade Span State
NCLB Target
Met State
NCLB Target
Grade Span State
NCLB Target
Met State
NCLB Target
3-5 Grade LAL 95.0% - 3-5 Grade Math 95.0% -
6-8 Grade LAL 95.0% - 6-8 Grade Math 95.0% -
11th Grade LAL 95.0% NA 11th Grade Math 95.0% NA
C. Proficiency rate for children with IEPs against grade level standards and alternate achievement standards
Grade Span State
NCLB Target
Met State
NCLB Target
Grade Span State
NCLB Target
Met State
NCLB Target
3-5 Grade LAL 75.0% - 3-5 Grade Math 62.0% -
6-8 Grade LAL 66.0% - 6-8 Grade Math 49.0% -
11th Grade LAL 79.0% NA 11th Grade Math 64.0% NA
 
Indicator 4A: Suspension/Expulsion - Performance Indicator
   Data Source: Electronic Violence and Vandalism Reporting System
Was the district identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school year? No
 
Indicator 5: School Age LRE - Performance Indicator   Data Source: Annual Data Report

Note: The LRE data for public reporting were collected on December 1, 2005. Please refer to the December 1, 2005 data for your district on the Department's website at http://www.nj.gov/education/specialed/data/2005.htm.

Does not include Non-Public Students Local Data State Target Met State Target
A. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 removed from regular class less than 21% of the day 84.3% 41.9% Y
B. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 removed from regular class greater than 60% of the day 0.% 17.8% Y
C. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 served in public or private separate schools, residential placements, or homebound or hospital placements 6.2% 10.3% Y
 
Indicator 6: Preschool LRE - Performance Indicator   Data Source: Annual Data Report

Note: The LRE data for public reporting were collected on December 1, 2005. Please refer to the December 1, 2005 data for your district on the Department's website at http://www.nj.gov/education/specialed/data/2005.htm.

With respect to the preschool data, not all placement categories are reported. Only those categories where preschoolers with disabilities were educated with non-disabled peers are being reported here. Kindergarten age students with disabilities (five year olds) are not included in the calculations.

Percent of preschool children with IEPs who received special education and related services in settings with typically developing peers (e.g., early childhood settings, home, and part-time early childhood/part-time early childhood special education settings) Local Data State Target Met State Target
100.0% 23% Y
 
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition - Compliance Indicator   Data Source: Annual Data Report

Note: Corrections or additions to the numbers for this indicator that were submitted after December 1, 2006 cannot be reflected in the public reporting. Resubmissions that were requested were for data verification purposes only and were not for revising the original data submission.

Although the data for indicator 12 were collected on December 1, 2006, the time period of collection reflects the referrals and evaluations completed during the 2005-2006 school year.

Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday Local Data State Target Met State Target
100 100% Y