| Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Eligibility Category – Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Data Source: Annual Data Report (Collection Dates: December 2005, 2006, 2007) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NJOSEP defined disproportionate representation from both a functional and statistical perspective. Functional Definition: Implementation of policies, procedures, and practices in the general education instructional, behavioral, and intervention process and/or the special education identification, referral, evaluation, or eligibility determination process that results in a systemic, pervasive, persistent pattern of inappropriate over-identification/under-identification of students with disabilities of a specific racial/ethnic group as eligible for special education and related services or in a specific eligibility category. Statistical Definition - NJOSEP used multiple measures to statistically determine disproportionate representation. The measures included three descriptive statistics: unweighted risk ratio; risk rate comparison; and a measure of impact comparing expected vs. observed numbers of students identified as eligible for special education. The measures also included a statistical test of significance - chi square. Districts were ranked on each of the three measures for a three year period (2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008. For the purpose of identifying districts with disproportionate representation (over-representation/under-representation) of racial/ethnic groups in specific disability categories, NJOSEP:
The procedure used one statistical test of significance and one statistical procedure. Calculations: The steps followed in the analysis:
|