Supplemental Educational Services
Provider Self-Evaluation Survey Results
2004-2005 Project Period
Supplemental Educational Services (SES) providers were surveyed about the services they provided during the 2004-05 project period which began September 1, 2004 and ended August 31, 2005. Of the 108 agencies approved as providers in 2004-2005 when this survey was disseminated, 97 responded to the SES provider survey. However, only 62 (57 percent) implemented an SES program during the 2004-05 project period. The results provide a picture of how SES was implemented to students in New Jersey.
Program Information
Ninety-seven providers responded to this portion of the survey. The most challenging issues for the providers during the 2004-05 school year were maintaining the attendance of the students, signing up students for the program and low parent turnout for the provider fairs. The attendance issues may be related to whether the program is located on the school site or off premises where parents are responsible for delivering and picking up the students. Other challenges presented for the providers were communicating with or contacting parents, resolving problems with the district including cash-flow concerns, retaining tutors and staff and communicating with district staff, respectively. It is not clear whether the communication issue with parents was related to getting parents to respond before or after their child was in the program. However, some variation of communicating with parents was listed several times as a challenge.
Despite the difficulties that the providers encountered, there were only two providers (two percent) that self-reported they received complaints. These complaints appeared to be issues of communication rather than service or program issues.
Data for Districts Served
There were 62 providers that responded to this portion of the survey. These providers served 541 schools in 83 school districts. 16,400 students were enrolled in the program, but only 10,482 or 64 percent were reported as completing the program. Of the 16,400 students enrolled in the program, 10,600 attended 80 percent or more of the sessions. Of the total number of students enrolled in the SES services, 1721 or 10 percent were reported to be English Language Learners, 687 or four percent were students with disabilities.
The total number of staff that provided SES services to students during the 2004-05 school year was 2451. 2538 instructional staff received SES training. The additional staff receiving training may reflect providers that trained teachers who did not eventually provide SES. The duplicated count of staff receiving professional development was 3888 by 59 providers. Of the 152 topics addressed in these professional development sessions, the primary topics covered in the professional development sessions were (see Attachment 1): the provider’s program, assessment, behavior management, instructional techniques, curriculum overview, communicating with parents, English language learners, and SES overview.
There were 27 to 30 students per school that participated in the SES program. The teacher/student ratio ranged from seven to eight students per instructor. The average number of tutoring sessions for a student was 29 for approximately 84 minutes per session.
The progress or success of the SES provider was likely to be measured by the state assessments with the exception of the HSPA which was rarely used as a measure. The respondents indicated that they primarily used, in order of frequency: other measures; provider-developed assessments (see Attachment 2); and the Terra Nova. The providers determined that of those students that completed the program, 9224 students (88 percent) demonstrated academic progress in reading/language arts literacy, and 7273 students (79 percent) demonstrated academic progress in math based upon the above referenced measures.
Below are the statistics of the survey.
Supplemental Educational Services (SES) providers were surveyed about the services they provided during the 2004-05 project period which began September 1, 2004 and ended August 31, 2005. Of the 108 agencies approved as providers in 2004-2005 when this survey was disseminated, 97 responded to the SES provider survey. However, only 62 (57 percent) implemented an SES program during the 2004-05 project period. The results provide a picture of how SES was implemented to students in New Jersey. Note that there were providers which may have served students in this project period but who were removed from the list prior to the dissemination of this survey.
|
Number |
Percentage |
Statistics on Services Provided |
|
|
Number of Providers Implementing SES |
62 |
57% |
Number of Providers that did not offer SES |
35 |
32% |
Number of Districts Served |
83 |
|
Number of Schools with Students Served |
541 |
|
Number of Students Enrolled |
16,400 |
|
Number of Students Who Completed the Program |
10,482 |
64% |
Number of Students Who Did Not Complete the Program |
4,250 |
26% |
Number of Students Who Attended SES Program 80% of Time |
10,600 |
65% |
|
|
|
Number of ELL Students Served |
1,721 |
10% |
Number of Disabled Students Served |
687 |
4% |
|
|
|
Number of Students Receiving LAL Instruction Demonstrating Progress |
9,224 |
88% |
Number of Students Receiving Math Demonstrating Progress |
7,273 |
69% |
|
|
|
Average Number of Tutoring Sessions per Students |
28.6 |
|
Average Number of Minutes for Tutoring Sessions |
84 |
|
|
|
|
Number of Instructional Staff |
2451 |
|
|
|
|
Measures of Progress (ranked) |
|
|
NJASK3 |
43 |
|
NJASK4 |
37 |
|
GEPA |
42 |
|
HSPA |
4 |
|
Terra Nova |
24 |
|
Other Measurements Used |
69 |
|
|
|
|
Program Implementation |
|
|
Summary of Challenges to Providers - Number Responding |
97 |
|
Signing up Students for the Program |
31 |
50% |
Low Turnout for Provider Fair |
25 |
40% |
Retaining Staff and/or Tutors |
9 |
15% |
Student Attendance |
40 |
65% |
Resolving Problems with the District |
10 |
16% |
Cash Flow Concerns |
10 |
16% |
Billing Issues with the District |
8 |
13% |
Location of Services for Students |
8 |
13% |
Communicating with Parents |
15 |
24% |
Communicating with Teachers and/or Administrators |
9 |
15% |
|
|
|
Number of Complaints |
2 |
3% |
|
|
|
Professional Development |
|
|
Number of Providers providing professional development |
59 |
|
Number of Professional Development Topics Addressed |
152 |
|
Number of Instructional Staff Trained |
2538 |
|
Duplicated Count of Instructors Receiving Professional Development |
3888 |
|
*Based upon the number of students who completed the program, 10,482.
Below is the list of assurances and authorization for continued services. Most responses were affirmative or indicated as not applicable if the provider did not provide SES in the 2004-2005 project period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attachment 1
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TOPICS - Summary |
Education Station Instructor Training - Reading & Math |
ASPIRA Programs and Procedures |
Assessment Overview |
Behavior Management Strategies |
Best instructional practices for meeting student needs |
Building a Twenty Minute Guided Reading Block |
Classroom Management – Primary & Middle School Educators |
Click A Tutor Web Based Instruction |
Coaching and mentoring |
College Board Resource |
Communicating student progress |
Continued supervision |
Curriculum Guide Orientation Sessions |
Developing Metacognitive Skills |
Developing Positive Parent Communications |
Differentiated Instruction |
English Language Learners |
ENGLISH GEPA |
Financial Literacy |
KnowledgePoints Program training |
Foundations Curriculum Training |
Fox in the Box Training |
GEPA Clustering |
Harcourt Trophies |
Houghton Mifflin Math |
How to Help Young Writers Grow - Telephonic Training |
Implementing learning paths |
Initial Teacher Training |
Introduction to SES Program |
Kaplan Teacher Development Program |
KRE/KME Curriculum and Technology Training |
Leapfrog Tracking & Assessment System |
Lesson Plans and application |
Lightspan |
Literacy Strategies for the Atypical Learner |
Literacy/ Math/ Learn to Succeed |
Materials Training |
Math |
Math Around the Clock |
MATH GEPA |
MATH HSPA |
Math Manipulatives |
Meeting student needs |
Monthly review and discussion of Lesson Plans |
Monthly Teacher Meetings |
NJASK, GEPA |
Odyssey Training & Review procedures for program |
Orientation on program and materials |
Time management in instruction. Transitioning students |
Problem Solving Is Everywhere |
Program outcomes and needs |
Quick Start Career Guide |
Reading Comprehension and Intervention |
Review procedures for the program |
Scott Foresman Reading Program |
SES Overview |
SES Self-evaluation workshops (DOE) |
Strategies for Instruction |
Supporting Struggling Readers |
Techniques in Writing |
Technology Training |
Tutor Protocol & Online Instructional Techniques |
Two Voices Read Aloud |
Use of CCC Software |
Using appropriate intervention in the Language Arts Program |
Wilson Language Overview |
Working with IEP/504 Students |
Writing Across the Curriculum |
Writing in Mathematics - Telephonic Training |
Attachment 2
OTHER STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS |
Assessment of Student Achievement (ASA) |
Assessments that accompanied curricula |
California Achievement Test CAT™ |
KTEA |
Kumon Placement and Kumon Achievement Tests |
Kumon Pre Tests and Kumon Post Tests |
LeapTrack |
LightSpan pre & post testing |
Math Level Indicator |
Newton Learning Assessment |
NJ PASS for 7th graders |
NJPASS |
Options Predictor |
Pathways Curriculum Assessment |
Pearson Assessment |
PLATO Achieve Now Progress Tests |
Plato Learning Edutest |
Plato-Edu test |
Reading and Math Level Indicators |
Reading Level Indicators |
Scholastic testing |
Supera |
teacher made tests |
WADE |
WOODCOCK |