|  
                                     TRENTON 
                                      – Attorney General Anne Milgram today 
                                      announced the filing of lawsuits charging 
                                      a total of 37 mortgage loan providers, mortgage 
                                      industry employees, lawyers and other defendants 
                                      with consumer fraud and civil racketeering 
                                      for using predatory “foreclosure rescue” 
                                      schemes to persuade desperate homeowners 
                                      to sign over their homes.  
                                    The 
                                      state alleges that the defendants obtained 
                                      at least $13.5 million worth of fraudulent 
                                      loans to further their foreclosure rescue 
                                      schemes. In addition, the state alleges 
                                      that defendants stole at least $3 million 
                                      in homeowner equity. 
                                    In 
                                      two separate but related state complaints, 
                                      the defendants are charged with exploiting 
                                      the financial hardship and fear of homeowners 
                                      by convincing them to surrender their homes 
                                      to third-party or “straw” buyers 
                                      as part of complex “sale/lease-back” 
                                      transactions. Homeowners were told that, 
                                      by signing over their property titles to 
                                      third-party buyers, they would be able to 
                                      still live in their homes as renters while 
                                      repairing damaged credit, and then, in the 
                                      future, buy back their dwellings.  
                                    In 
                                      reality, the state lawsuits charge, the 
                                      solvency and renewed home ownership promised 
                                      by such deals did not materialize. Instead, 
                                      defendants collected most of the sale/lease-back 
                                      proceeds for themselves, thereby stripping 
                                      the homes of their equity value. Struggling 
                                      homeowners were left with few or no means 
                                      to pay rent or re-establish their credit. 
                                      Some of the homeowners have been evicted 
                                      from their homes, while others remain and 
                                      continue to pay rent. In some instances, 
                                      defendants continue to collect the rent 
                                      but do not apply the rent payments to the 
                                      mortgage, leaving the homes once again in 
                                      foreclosure.  
                                    “The 
                                      conduct charged in these lawsuits is unconscionable. 
                                      These defendants preyed on people who were 
                                      facing foreclosure and searching for a lifeline 
                                      that would enable them to get back on their 
                                      feet and remain in their homes,” said 
                                      Attorney General Milgram. “Having 
                                      placed their hope and trust in these defendants, 
                                      victims ended up far worse off than they 
                                      were before. It is critical that we root 
                                      out this kind of fraud and protect consumers 
                                      who go seeking help from finding complete 
                                      financial ruin instead.” 
                                    Filed 
                                      on October 15 in New Jersey Superior Court 
                                      in Bergen County, the state’s lawsuits 
                                      are against Vest Financial LLC, formerly 
                                      of Paramus, along with 16 other defendants, 
                                      and JP Global Property Management, Inc., 
                                      of Bloomfield, along with 19 other defendants. 
                                      Five defendants are common to both complaints. 
                                    Together, 
                                      the two complaints allege violations of 
                                      both the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and 
                                      the New Jersey Racketeer Influenced and 
                                      Corrupt Organizations Act involving a total 
                                      of 48 properties. The properties are located 
                                      in 14 counties including Atlantic, Bergen, 
                                      Burlington, Cape May, Essex, Gloucester, 
                                      Hudson, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, 
                                      Passaic, Somerset and Union. 
                                    The 
                                      state alleges that defendants in the Vest 
                                      complaint stole at least $1.25 million in 
                                      homeowner equity, while defendants in the 
                                      JP Global case stole at least $1.75 million 
                                      in homeowner equity.  
                                    As 
                                      a result of the defendants’ conduct, 
                                      at least $4 million in fraudulently obtained 
                                      rescue loans are in default. 
                                    The 
                                      Vest Financial lawsuit names as defendants 
                                      five corporations and 12 individuals. The 
                                      JP Global Property Management complaint 
                                      names as defendants three corporations and 
                                      17 individuals.  
                                    Among 
                                      other things, the lawsuits seek court-imposed 
                                      penalties, restitution for consumers and 
                                      permanent injunctions banning companies 
                                      named as defendants from offering foreclosure 
                                      rescue or credit repair services to consumers. 
                                      The lawsuits also seek to have the records 
                                      of the defendants impounded, and the assets 
                                      of each defendant frozen, with no ability 
                                      to dispose of any assets. 
                                       
                                      The two lawsuits are: 
                                    Milgram 
                                      v. Vest Financial, L.L.C: The State’s 
                                      four-count complaint charges Vest and the 
                                      other defendants with soliciting consumers 
                                      facing foreclosure or otherwise experiencing 
                                      money troubles that could lead to losing 
                                      their homes.  
                                    According 
                                      to the lawsuit, the defendants advertised 
                                      “foreclosure rescue” services 
                                      over the Internet and radio, and by word-of-mouth 
                                      within the real estate and mortgage broker 
                                      communities.  
                                    The 
                                      defendants are accused of falsely leading 
                                      homeowners to believe that surrendering 
                                      the titles to their homes would save them 
                                      from foreclosure when, in fact, entering 
                                      into such a straw-buyer arrangement would 
                                      only imperil them further while enriching 
                                      the defendants.  
                                    Among 
                                      other things, the defendants are charged 
                                      with civil racketeering. Predicate offenses 
                                      listed in the racketeering count of the 
                                      lawsuit include theft by deception, forgery, 
                                      bank fraud and money laundering. The suit 
                                      also charges violations of the Consumer 
                                      Fraud Act including unconscionable business 
                                      practices and making false promises; misrepresentations 
                                      and knowing omissions of fact; and violation 
                                      of state advertising regulations. The alleged 
                                      conduct took place between 2005 and early 
                                      2008.  
                                    Defendants 
                                      other than Vest Financial named in the lawsuit, 
                                      all but one of them from New Jersey, include: 
                                       
                                    Metropolitan 
                                      Mortgage Services, Inc., of Cliffside Park; 
                                      Alex Armani of Cliffside Park; Sohrab Moussavian 
                                      of Englewood; Anthony Scordo III of West 
                                      Orange; Felix Nihamin, an attorney who resides 
                                      in Franklin Lakes and practices in New York 
                                      City; Francis A. Ciambrone, an attorney 
                                      with law offices in Paramus; Rhys A. Herrmann, 
                                      of Belleville; JP Global Property Management 
                                      LLC of Bloomfield; Peter H. Eckhardt, Jr. 
                                      of Livingston; Philip Altieri of Flemington; 
                                      Kristopher Pilone of Manalapan; DBK Realty 
                                      Investments LLC of Edison; Tom A. Andriopoulos 
                                      of Washington Township (Bergen County); 
                                      Settlement Source, LLC of Edison; Vivian 
                                      M. Ruiz of Hillsdale and Glen B. Thompson, 
                                      New York City. 
                                       
                                      Milgram v. JP Global Property Management, 
                                      Inc.: The four-count JP Global 
                                      Property Management lawsuit, while encompassing 
                                      more property transactions than the Vest 
                                      complaint, charges essentially the same 
                                      fraudulent and collusive conduct in duping 
                                      distressed homeowners with “foreclosure 
                                      rescue” schemes. Again, homeowners 
                                      facing foreclosure were presented with a 
                                      way to continue living in their homes by 
                                      signing over their titles to a third-party 
                                      buyer. Ostensibly, homeowners would pay 
                                      “rent” to the new owner while 
                                      repairing their credit, then would be in 
                                      a position to buy back their home in the 
                                      future.  
                                    The 
                                      schemes were typically facilitated, the 
                                      lawsuit charges, through loan applications 
                                      and other documents containing false information. 
                                       
                                    Homeowners 
                                      often never met the purchaser of their homes 
                                      and, once having committed to the sale/leaseback 
                                      transaction, were presented with monthly 
                                      “rent” terms more costly than 
                                      their original mortgages. Also, victims 
                                      typically received no money at closing despite 
                                      prior assurances the equity in their homes 
                                      would be theirs to keep. 
                                       
                                      The defendants are charged with civil racketeering 
                                      including predicate offenses such as theft 
                                      by deception, forgery, issuing false financial 
                                      statements, deceptive business practices 
                                      and money laundering. The suit also charges 
                                      violations of the Consumer Fraud Act , including 
                                      failing to properly conduct settlement proceedings, 
                                      forging consumer’s names on documents, 
                                      refusing to provide consumers with copies 
                                      of sales contracts and other loan papers, 
                                      making false promises misrepresentations 
                                      and , knowing omissions of fact, and violation 
                                      of state advertising regulations. The alleged 
                                      conduct took place between 2004 and early 
                                      2008. 
                                    Defendants 
                                      other than JP Global Property Management 
                                      named in the lawsuit, all but one of them 
                                      from New Jersey, include:  
                                    Jeremy 
                                      P. Sorvino of Waldwick; Jeffrey M. Malen 
                                      of Ringwood; Peter H. Eckhardt, Jr. of Livingston; 
                                      Christopher William Eckhardt of Washington 
                                      Township, (Bergen County); Anthony Scordo 
                                      III of West Orange; Felix Nihamin, an attorney 
                                      who resides in Franklin Lakes and practices 
                                      in New York City; Michael J. Andalaft, an 
                                      attorney with law offices in Cedar Grove; 
                                      Capital Hill Mortgage, Inc.; Stanley Capital 
                                      Mortgage Company, Inc. of Englewood Cliffs; 
                                      Rhys A. Herrmann of Belleville; Brendan 
                                      Joseph Flynn of Fort Lee; Maryann E. Sorvino 
                                      of Ridgewood; Frances B. Benna of Elmwood 
                                      Park; Vincent F. Latorre of Kenilworth; 
                                      Jennifer R. Kortman of Livingston; Rebecca 
                                      A. Kortman of Chatham; William McVeigh of 
                                      Wharton; Mauricio V. Almeida of Colonia 
                                      and Glenn B. Thompson of New York City. 
                                       
                                    Attorney 
                                      General Milgram thanked Deputy Attorney 
                                      General Megan Lewis, Chief of the Affirmative 
                                      Litigation Section; Deputy Attorney General 
                                      Wendy Leggett Faulk of the Affirmative Litigation 
                                      Section; Assistant Attorney General James 
                                      J. Savage; and Supervising Investigator 
                                      Jennifer Micco of the Division of Consumer 
                                      Affairs, for their hard work on the foreclosure 
                                      rescue fraud investigation and lawsuits. 
                                         
                                    # 
                                      # #  |