|
Certifying
Officer Letters 2001
2000
Certifying Officer Letters
1999 Certifying Officer Letters
1998 Certifying Officer Letters
1997 Certifying Officer Letters
December
14, 2001
TO:
Defined Contribution Plan Participating Employers
FROM: Joseph
Zisa, Plan Manager
SUBJECT: Program
Changes Affecting Payroll Operations for the State Employees Deferred
Compensation Plan (IRC 457b)
On
June 7, 2001 President Bush signed the federal Economic Growth and
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. This legislation contains
a number of requirements and plan options that will change the defined
contribution plans administered by the Division of Pensions and
Benefits.
This
letter contains a summary of the changes that will be effective
in 2002 for the State’s section 457 plan, the New Jersey State Employees
Deferred Compensation Plan.
Employer
Payroll Deferral Reporting Requirements
No
changes are required in the methods used to report payroll deferrals
or the types of information reported to the Division of Pensions
and Benefits.
Normal
Deferral Limit
Under
the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act, 457(b) Deferred
Compensation Plan participants can defer up to the lesser of $11,000
or 50% of compensation for the tax year 2002.
To
calculate the maximum deferral amount for Deferred Compensation,
the member’s tax deferred contributions to other plans must first
be subtracted from gross pay. These plans and their applicable IRS
code are shown below:
- Mandatory
pension contributions – 414(h)
- SACT Tax
Deferred – 403(b)
- ACTS –
403(b)
- Alternate
Benefit Program voluntary contributions – 403(b)
- Tax$ave
(Premium Option Plan, Unreimbursed Medical Spending Account,
Dependent Care Spending Account) – 125
The
maximum deferral for the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan is then
50% of the remaining salary up to the stated dollar limitation.
After
2002 the dollar maximums for the State Employees Deferred Compensation
Plan will increase by $1,000 for each of the following tax years
up to $15,000 in tax year 2006, after which the maximum will be
indexed for inflation in $500 increments.
Coordination
of 457(b) Deferrals with Contributions to Other Plans
Coordination
of 457(b) deferrals with 403(b) salary reductions is not required
after December 31, 2001. Prior to December 31, 2001, a member’s
ability to defer salary to a 457(b) deferred compensation plan was
reduced by salary reductions under a 403(b) tax-sheltered annuity
program such as those offered under SACT, ACTS, or ABP. For example,
in 2001 the 457(b) deferral limit was $8,500. If a member had a
salary reduction agreement under SACT/Tax-Shelter for $3,000, the
deferral limit under 457(b) was reduced to $5,500; therefore the
total deferral/reduction for the year was $8,500 between the two
programs.
Starting
in 2002 this coordination requirement is eliminated from section
457 of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, unless the member’s
salary deferrals are otherwise limited, an individual may defer
$11,000 to the 457(b) deferred compensation plan and another $11,000
to any 403(b) tax-sheltered annuity program for a total deduction
of $22,000 without invoking any of the permitted catch-up provisions.
Traditional
Catch-up Limit
In
the three years prior to retirement a Deferred Compensation Plan
member may defer twice the normal limit. The eligibility requirements
for this elective option under the plan remain unchanged. Prior
to January 1, 2002, the annual catch-up deferral limit was set at
$15,000. After December 31, 2001, the amount will be twice the prevailing
normal deferral limit; for example, $22,000 in 2002 and $24,000
in 2003. The amount will increase until it reaches $30,000 in 2006
and thereafter be affected by indexing in the same manner as the
normal deferral limit. A member must still have sufficient underutilization
of deferrals (catch-up dollars) from prior years of plan participation
and the election may only be used once. Members must still apply
to take advantage of this catch-up provision. Members who have already
used their three years of catch-up are not permitted to "re-start"
catch-up under the higher limits.
"Enhanced"
Deferral Amount for Those Age 50 or Older
A
new "enhanced" deferral amount is permitted for those
members age 50 or older. The new amount will first be effective
in tax year 2002. The amount will be permitted in addition to the
normal deferral amount (lesser of $11,000 or 50% of compensation
for the tax year 2002) and be available to anyone at least 50 years
of age at any point during the tax year. The "enhanced"
deferral amount will not be available during any tax year in which
the member elects to use the higher, traditional catch-up limit.
The
additional amount available will be $1,000 in tax year 2002 for
a maximum deferral of $12,000 and will increase by $1,000 per year
through 2006 when it reaches $5,000 after which the maximum will
be indexed for inflation in $500 increments. The member does not
have to do anything to take advantage of this deferral other than
select a contribution amount high enough to reach the maximum contribution
limit.
Minimum
Deferral Amount Reduction
To
encourage greater participation, the Deferred Compensation Board
has reduced the minimum contribution levels permitted under the
rules of the plan. Beginning January 1, 2002, Deferred Compensation
Plan participants may defer as little as the larger of 1% of pay
or $10 per pay, $20 per month.
If
you have any questions about this subject, please call the Defined
Contributions Unit at (609) 292-3440.
December
14, 2001
TO:
Defined Contribution Plan Participating Employers
FROM: Joseph
Zisa, Plan Manager
SUBJECT: Program
Changes Affecting Payroll Operations for the State-Administered
Defined Contribution Plans (IRC 403b and 457b)
On
June 7, 2001 President Bush signed the federal Economic Growth and
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. This legislation contains
a number of requirements and plan options that will change the defined
contribution plans administered by the Division of Pensions and
Benefits.
This
letter contains a summary of the changes that will be effective
in 2002 for the State’s section 457 and 403(b) plans. These plans
include the New Jersey State Employees Deferred Compensation Plan,
the Supplemental Annuity Collective Trust of New Jersey (SACT),
the Additional Contributions Tax Sheltered Program (ACTS), and the
Alternate Benefit Program (ABP).
Employer
Payroll Deferral Reporting Requirements
No
changes are required in the methods used to report payroll deferrals
or the types of information reported to the Division of Pensions
and Benefits.
Normal
Deferral Limit – 457(b) & 403(b) Plans
Under
the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act, 457(b) Deferred
Compensation Plan participants can defer up to the lesser of $11,000
or 50% of compensation for the tax year 2002.
To
calculate the maximum deferral amount for the 457(b) Deferred Compensation
Plan, the member’s tax deferred contributions to other plans must
first be subtracted from gross pay. These plans and their applicable
IRS code are shown below:
- Mandatory
pension contributions – 414(h)
- SACT Tax
Deferred – 403(b)
- ACTS –
403(b)
- Alternate
Benefit Program voluntary contributions – 403(b)
- Tax$ave
(Premium Option Plan, Unreimbursed Medical Spending Account,
Dependent Care Spending Account) – 125
The
maximum deferral for the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan is then
50% of the remaining salary up to the stated dollar limitation.
Participants
in 403(b) tax-sheltered annuity plans (SACT tax deferred, ACTS,
and ABP additional voluntary contributions) can defer up to the
lesser of $11,000 or 100% of compensation (without reduction for
deferrals to other plans) for the tax year 2002.
After
2002 the dollar maximums for all plans will increase by $1,000 for
each of the following tax years up to $15,000 in tax year 2006,
after which the maximum will be indexed for inflation in $500 increments.
Coordination
of 457(b) Deferrals with Contributions to Other Plans
Coordination
of 457(b) deferrals with 403(b) salary reductions is not required
after December 31, 2001. Prior to December 31, 2001, a member’s
ability to defer salary to a 457(b) deferred compensation plan was
reduced by salary reductions under a 403(b) tax-sheltered annuity
program such as those offered under SACT, ACTS, or ABP. For example,
in 2001 the 457(b) deferral limit was $8,500. If a member had a
salary reduction agreement under SACT/Tax-Shelter for $3,000, the
deferral limit under 457(b) was reduced to $5,500; therefore the
total deferral/reduction for the year was $8,500 between the two
programs.
Starting
in 2002 this coordination requirement is eliminated from section
457 of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, unless the member’s
salary deferrals are otherwise limited, an individual may defer
$11,000 to the 457(b) deferred compensation plan and another $11,000
to any 403(b) tax-sheltered annuity program for a total deduction
of $22,000 without invoking any of the permitted catch-up provisions.
457(b)
Traditional Catch-up Limit
In
the three years prior to retirement, a Deferred Compensation Plan
member may defer twice the normal limit. The eligibility requirements
for this elective option under the plan remain unchanged. Prior
to January 1, 2002, the annual catch-up deferral limit was set at
$15,000. After December 31, 2001, the amount will be twice the prevailing
normal deferral limit; for example, $22,000 in 2002 and $24,000
in 2003. The amount will increase until it reaches $30,000 in 2006
and thereafter be affected by indexing in the same manner as the
normal deferral limit. A member must still have sufficient underutilization
of deferrals (catch-up dollars) from prior years of plan participation
and the election may only be used once. Members must still apply
to take advantage of this catch-up provision. Members who have already
used their three years of catch-up are not permitted to "re-start"
catch-up under the higher limits.
403(b)
and 457(b) "Enhanced" Deferral Amount for Those Age 50
or Older
A
new "enhanced" deferral amount is permitted for those
members age 50 or older. The new amount will first be effective
in tax year 2002. The amount will be permitted in addition to the
normal deferral amount (lesser of $11,000 or 50% of compensation
for the tax year 2002) and be available to anyone at least 50 years
of age at any point during the tax year. The "enhanced"
deferral amount will not be available during any tax year in which
the member elects to use the higher, traditional catch-up limit.
The
additional amount available will be $1,000 in tax year 2002 for
a maximum deferral in each plan of $12,000 and will increase by
$1,000 per year through 2006 when it reaches $5,000 after which
the maximum will be indexed for inflation in $500 increments. The
member does not have to do anything to take advantage of this deferral
other than select a contribution percentage amount high enough to
reach the maximum contribution limit.
457(b)
Minimum Deferral Amount Reduction
To
encourage greater participation, the Deferred Compensation Board
has reduced the minimum contribution levels permitted under the
rules of the plan. Beginning January 1, 2002, Deferred Compensation
Plan participants may defer as little as the larger of 1% of pay
or $10 per pay, $20 per month.
If
you have any questions about this subject, please call the Defined
Contributions Unit at (609) 292-3440.
December
3, 2001
TO: Public
Employees’ Retirement System Certifying Officers, Institutions of
Higher Education
FROM: Janice
C. Curtin
Assistant
Director, Pension Operations
SUBJECT: Return
to PERS Employment after Retirement
Acting
Governor DiFrancesco signed Chapter 253, P.L. 2001 into law on November
15, 2001. This law allows retired members of the Public Employees’
Retirement System (PERS) to accept employment in teaching positions
with institutions of higher education, regardless of salary, without
being subject to suspension of their retirement benefits and re-enrollment
in the PERS.
The
law defines institutions of higher education to include Rutgers
– the State University, the University of Medicine and Dentistry
of New Jersey, the New Jersey Institute of Technology, the State
colleges and universities, and the county colleges.
The
law already permitted PERS retirees to return to work without affecting
their retirement benefits, as long as their salary was below $10,000
per calendar year. Chapter 253 eliminates the earnings limit only
for teaching positions at institutions of higher education.
PERS
members must have a valid retirement to take advantage of this law.
That is, they must have terminated all PERS covered employment prior
to their retirement and due and payable dates, their retirement
must be due and payable, and they must have at least a thirty-day
break in employment after their effective retirement date. In other
words, members must terminate employment prior to their retirement
date and not start PERS covered employment again until after they
have been issued their first retirement check.
If
you have questions about this law, contact our Office of Client
Services at (609) 292-7524.
December
2001
TO: SHBP
Participating Local Government Employers
SHBP Participating
Local Education Employers
State Biweekly
Benefits Administrators
State Monthly
Human Resource Directors/Benefit Administrators
FROM: New
Jersey State Health Benefits Program
SUBJECT:
Changes in Chiropractic Care for Traditional Plan and NJ
PLUS Members
The
State Health Benefits Commission recently adopted a change in policy
for chiropractic care for members enrolled in the Traditional
Plan and NJ PLUS. The policy change will be effective
January 1, 2002.
The
new policy allows for a 30-visit maximum per benefit year. Members
will no longer need to submit updated medical records and/or treatment
plans for review and approval for services rendered on or after
January 1, 2002.
For
all services received prior to January 1, 2002, the current chiropractic
claim and utilization review program will continue to apply. Horizon
Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey has already notified Traditional
Plan and NJ PLUS members who are currently in review status for
chiropractic care of this change in policy.
Traditional
Plan and NJ PLUS members with questions regarding this change of
policy should contact Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
at 1-800-414-SHBP (7427).
October
2001
TO: State
Health Benefits Program Participating Employers
FROM: Florence
J. Sheppard, Assistant Director, Health Benefits
SUBJECT: Combining
Service Credit Under Multiple Retirement Systems to Qualify for
Employer-paid State Health Benefits Program Coverage
P.L.
2001, Chapter 209, signed on August 15, 2001 by Acting Governor
DiFrancesco, amended the statutes (N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.25 et seq.)
governing a retiree's eligibility for state or employer-paid coverage
under the State Health Benefits Program (SHBP). Chapter 209 provides
for an aggregation of nonconcurrent pension credit in multiple pension
funds to qualify for the 25 or more years of service credit needed
for State or employer-paid retired SHBP benefits. Chapter 209 did
not change the definition of a qualified retiree under the provisions
of P.L. 1997, Chapter 330 which provides for the State payment of
a portion of SHBP coverage for retired Police and Firemen's Retirement
System members and law enforcement officers.
Before
Chapter 209, retirees of the State, boards of education and state
and county colleges, excepting those who retired on disability retirement
benefits, needed 25 or more years of service credit in a single
retirement system to qualify for State-paid retired SHBP coverage.
Local participating employers could also choose to provide employer-paid
SHBP coverage to their retirees who accrued 25 years of creditable
service in a single State or locally administered retirement
system.
Chapter
209 now permits the 25-year service credit requirement to be met
by combining nonconcurrent service credit in one or more
State or locally administered retirement systems.
The
member must be receiving a retirement benefit from each membership
and cannot have withdrawn or allowed the accounts to expire.
For
example, a member with 15 years in a PERS account, who then accrues
10 years of nonconcurrent service in the TPAF, and retires and begins
to receive a benefit from both accounts could be eligible. Conversely,
a member with 15 years in a PERS account and 10 years in a TPAF
account, who had concurrent service for 2 of those years, would
not be eligible because they would only have 23 years of nonconcurrent
service.
To
qualify for coverage based on combined service in more than one
retirement system, members must:
- Retire
and collect a benefit from each retirement system;
- Have more
than 25 years of nonconcurrent service credit in total;
- Retire
from the last retirement system after the effective date of
this law, August 15, 2001;
- Be eligible
for employer-paid SHBP coverage immediately prior to retirement
from the last contributing employer in the retirement system
for retirees of the State or participating local employers who
have agreed by resolution to pay for the coverage of their retirees.
In order to receive state-paid SHBP coverage as a retiree of
a school board or county college, a retiree must be eligible
for employer-paid coverage immediately prior to retirement or
separation from the school board or county college. The school
board or county college must have been the retiree’s last contributing
employer; and
- Notify
the Division of Pensions and Benefits that they have an aggregate
of 25 or more years of nonconcurrent service in more than one
public retirement system in New Jersey.
Please
note, the provisions of Chapter 209 are not retroactive. This new
law does not affect members who retired prior to August 15, 2001.
Chapter
209 also changed the legal basis for Chapter 48, P.L. 1999 resolutions
by removing the reference to the local government law (N.J.S.A.
40A:10-23). Local government units participating in the SHBP can
use the provisions of Chapter 48 for greater flexibility in defining
which employees qualify for post-retirement SHBP coverage. Chapter
48 provided that employers may, under uniform conditions, assume
the cost of post-retirement medical coverage for retirees and their
dependents who have:
- Retired
on a disability pension; and/or
- Retired
with 25 or more years of service credit in one or more State
or locally administered retirement systems and a period of service
of up to 25 years with the employer at the time of retirement,
such period as established by the employer; or
- Retired
upon or after the attainment of age 65 with 25 or more years
of service credit in one or more State or locally administered
retirement systems and a period of service of up to 25 years
with the employer at the time of retirement, such period as
established by the employer; or
- Retired
on or after age 62 with at least 15 years of service with the
employer.
If
you would like more information regarding the filing of a Chapter
48 resolution, please review the certifying officers’ letter, dated
May 18, 1999, which may be found at www.state.nj.us/treasury/pensions/epbam/exhibits/pdf/hr0426.pdf
September 2001
TO: Certifying
Officers of Municipal Authorities Participating in the State Health
Benefits Program
FROM: Florence
Sheppard
Assistant
Director, Health Benefits
SUBJECT: Health
Care Waivers
On
July 31, 2001, Chapter 189, P.L. 2001 became law with provisions
affecting municipal authorities participating in the State Health
Benefits Program (SHBP). This legislation allows a municipal authority
that participates in the SHBP or another group health benefit plan
to:
-
permit
employees, who receive health care benefits as a dependent of
their spouse, to waive coverage and receive an incentive. The
incentive cannot exceed 50% of the amount saved by the municipality
because of the waiver of benefits.
-
permit
an employee, who has waived coverage under the provisions of
this law, to immediately resume health coverage if they lose
their coverage as a dependent.
The
decision of the municipal authority to allow its employees to waive
coverage and the amount of the incentive to be paid cannot be subject
to the collective bargaining process.
The
law requires employees participating in the SHBP to file a waiver
with the Division of Pensions and Benefits when they accept an incentive
in lieu of health coverage, and a declaration when they revoke the
waiver. The attached State
Health Benefits Program Coverage Waiver/Reinstatement
form is to be used for these purposes in conjunction with the
SHBP Application. This form is to be completed by any employee electing
to waive health coverage to receive a cash incentive. The form is
also to be used by an employee to reinstate waived health coverage
due to the loss of the employee's spousal coverage. The employee
must attach the form to a completed New Jersey State Health Benefits
Application when filing with the Division.
Any
municipal authority contemplating exercising its right to offer
a cash incentive to waive health benefits should discuss with legal
counsel the federal income tax consequences of such an action on
its employees. If a cash incentive provided by an employer is not
part of an Internal Revenue Code Section 125 plan, the health benefits
provided to its other employees may be subject to federal taxes.
Municipal authorities considering offering a cash incentive are
urged to seek the advice of counsel that is knowledgeable with federal
and state tax matters, especially with regard to employee benefits
plans.
If
you have any question regarding this law, please call the Division’s
Office of Client Services at (609) 292-7524.
Attachment
September
2001
TO:
Certifying Officers of the Police and Firemen's
Retirement System
FROM:
Thomas P. Bryan, Director
SUBJECT:
Request for List Of Contracts Covering PFRS
Members
The
Police and Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) Board of Trustees
has asked the Division of Pensions and Benefits to establish a program
to monitor changes in pensionable compensation of members participating
in the PFRS. The Board expects this program to include the review
of individual employment agreements and collective bargaining unit
contracts for PFRS members to ensure that compensation reported
by employers as creditable for pension purposes meets the definition
established in N.J.A.C. 17:4-4-1.
As
a preliminary step in the development of this program, the Division
needs to identify the number and type of contracts pertinent to
PFRS members. Please complete the attached
form listing this information and return it by October 30, 2001.
Instructions:
Under Agreement or Contract, list the bargaining unit representing
a group of covered employees and the union that represents that
group, e.g., Superior Officers Association, PEA. For individual
contracts, list the title(s) covered under the agreement, e.g.,
Chief of Police, Fire Chief.
Under
# Employees Covered, list the number of employees covered
under a collective bargaining contract. For individual employment
contracts, list the first initial and last name of the covered member.
Under Contract Period, list the starting and ending dates
of the current contract period.
Sample
Chart
|
Agreement
or Contract
|
# Emplovees Covered
|
Contract
Period (From to dates)
|
| Superior
Officers Association, FOP |
36
|
7/1/99
- 6/30/03 |
| Chief of
Police |
W.
Brown
|
10/1/00
- 9/30/02 |
If
you have any questions about this letter or the form, please contact
the External Audit Unit at (609) 292-3664. The e-mail address is
Czyzyk_m@tre.state.nj.us
attachment
September
2001
TO:
Certifying
Officers,
Teachers’
Pension and Annuity Fund (TPAF)
Public Employees’ Retirement
System (PERS)
Police and Firemen’s Retirement
System ( PFRS)
State Police Retirement System (SPRS)
Alternate Benefit Program (ABP)
FROM: Thomas
P. Bryan, Director
SUBJECT: Benefit
Continuation for Employees Called to Active Duty During Operations
Noble Eagle and Enduring Freedom
President
George W. Bush announced a call-up of reserve forces as part of
Operation Noble Eagle and Operation Enduring Freedom in response
to the recent terrorist attacks against the United States. Acting
Governor Donald T. DiFrancesco issued Executive Order #133 extending
benefits to certain State employees called-up to military duty for
Operation Noble Eagle and Operation Enduring Freedom.
This
memorandum provides guidance to employers on the subject of continuation
of benefits of employees called-up for military duty.
Leave
of Absence with Pay for Military Service - State Employees (Includes
those receiving full pay, differential pay or no pay).
Employees
covered by Executive Order #133 receive the following benefits while
in active military service:
- Full seniority
and benefits consistent with state and federal military reemployment
and seniority rights upon termination of active duty and return
to state employment.
- Health
benefits, life insurance, and pension coverage during active
duty service as though they were on a paid leave of absence.
- Differential
pay between their State gross salary and their military base
pay.
Health
Benefits. Although health benefits coverage can continue for
employees who are called-up for military duty, it may not be in
their interest to do so. This is particularly the case if there
is a cost to the employee for continuing the coverage. Employees
with single coverage will have their full medical needs met by the
military. Family members could possibly have their needs met by
the military or other coverage. Therefore, employees should be given
the option of waiving the health benefits coverage in case they
do not need the coverage while the employee is on military duty.
If not expressly waived, that coverage will be continued while the
employee is on military duty. If coverage is not waived and is continued,
the employee will be responsible for normal employee contributions
for this coverage. These contributions will be deducted from any
differential pay provided. If there is no differential pay or if
it is insufficient to cover the health benefits contributions, the
employee contributions will be collected from the employee upon
return from military duty.
The
employee should be given the attached form, Waiver
of State Health Benefits Program Coverage While on Military Duty,
so the option to cancel coverage can be exercised. Dependent coverage
cannot be continued without the employee being covered except under
the provisions of COBRA.
Differential
Pay and Deductions. The Office of Management and Budget will
issue detailed guidance on this subject. Employees’ regular pension
contributions, contributory group life insurance premiums, and medical
and dental premium payments will be deducted from their pay or paid
by employers in the absence of sufficient pay. Upon the employee’s
return from military duty, the employer will collect any payments
that were made on the employee’s behalf.
If
pension back deductions, arrears, and loan payments are not met
from differential pay, their collection should be automatically
resumed when the employee returns to employment. Employees
who wish to make supplemental retirement plan contributions based
on their full salary may do so upon return from military duty by
filing a USERRA form,
which is attached and described on page 3.
Alternate
Benefit Program (ABP). ABP employee contributions will
be based upon the gross differential salary. Employer contributions
to the ABP will be based upon full base salary and should be paid
regardless of whether the employee receives differential pay.
Employees who wish to make contributions based on their full
salary may do so upon return from military duty by filing a USERRA
form, which is attached and described on page 3.
Leave
of Absence with Pay for Military Service - Local Employees
Local
employers and independent authorities are not covered by the Executive
Order. They have the option of paying compensation, however, to
their employees who are called to active military duty. Whatever
policy the employer adopts should be applied consistently to all
affected employees.
Local
employers who elect to consider employees called up for military
duty as on a paid leave of absence should continue to report and
remit regular pension contributions, and, if appropriate, State
Health Benefits Program payments in the normal manner. If an employee
receives no differential pay or if the differential pay is insufficient
to cover all deductions in effect at the time of activation, the
employer should pay the deductions for an employee's regular pension
contributions, contributory group life insurance, and, if appropriate,
State Health Benefits Program coverage. The employer may then bill
the employee for these costs after the military leave is over. If
the differential pay is not sufficient to cover back deductions,
arrears, and loans, indicate that in the remarks column of the Report
of Contributions. If you file your Report of Contributions by
tape, do not reflect any of these payments and resume deductions
upon the employee’s return from military duty.
Leaves
of Absence for Military Service without Pay
This
situation applies to those employees whose employers elect not to
extend similar benefits available to State employees under the Executive
Order.
Public
employees who are called to military duty and are not considered
as being on a paid leave of absence may have pension entitlements
when they return to work under the provisions of the Uniformed Services
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) 38 USC 4301
et seq. USERRA provides that an employee who leaves a civilian employer
for the purpose of serving in the uniformed services, and who returns
to employment with the employer, is entitled to restoration of certain
pension and similar benefits that would have accrued but for the
employee's absence due to qualified military service. These employees
shall be treated as not having incurred a break in service with
the employer by reason of the member's period of service in the
uniformed services. The period of service shall count as if the
member had never left for the purposes of vesting or determining
eligibility for retirement and health benefits, but not for
benefits calculation purposes. For example, a member with
24 years of pension credit and 1 year of eligible service in the
uniformed services would have 25 years of service and would be eligible
to collect a retirement benefit before age 60 for PERS and TPAF
members, or be eligible for employer paid health benefit coverage
(if this benefit is available). However, the actual pension calculation
would use the 24 years of service. An example for vesting purposes
would be that a member with 7 years of pension credit and 3 years
of eligible service in the uniformed services would be vested.
When
the member returns to covered employment within the time frames
specified under USERRA, the employer shall notify the Division in
writing that the member has returned from service in the uniformed
services and the dates of such service using the attached USERRA
form.
The
member may also receive pension credit for the period of uniformed
service by making the employee pension contributions that would
have been required had the member not left employment to serve in
the uniformed services. The member may request in writing that the
Division schedule back deductions based upon the salary the member
would have received but for the period of service; or if the determination
of such rate is not reasonably certain, on the basis of the member's
average rate of compensation during the 10 or 12 month period immediately
preceding such service. The salary is then multiplied by the member's
rate of contribution in effect when the member returned for the
period of time in which no credit was received in the system for
that service. Any payment to the plan described in this paragraph
shall be made during the period that begins on the date of reemployment
and continues for the lesser of either five years or three times
the period of the uniformed service. The member may choose to pay
the amount in one lump sum instead of back deductions. The Division
must receive the request for this time within the lesser of either
five years or three times the period of the uniformed service from
the date of reemployment, to receive credit for such service. If
the member decides to make contributions for this service, those
contributions or lump sum payment shall be deferred from federal
taxation.
The
member is also permitted to make additional elective deferrals (Deferred
Compensation, ACTS or SACT) in an amount not exceeding the maximum
amount the employee would have been permitted to contribute during
the period of military service if the employee had actually been
employed by the employer during that period.
Life
Insurance. Coverage for noncontributory death benefits
continues for 93 days after the last day of paid covered employment.
A member may convert coverage to an individual policy directly with
Prudential within the 31 days beyond the 93 days of coverage as
described above. If a member wants to keep converted coverage after
reemployment, the member must prove insurability to restore the
coverage through the retirement system. If the coverage is not converted
or the converted coverage is surrendered, the coverage is reinstated
automatically upon return to employment.
For
continuation of existing contributory insurance coverage
under PERS and TPAF, the member must prepay the contributions to
the Division directly for the 93 days of coverage.
Health
Insurance. A military leave of absence is treated as any other
leave of absence without pay for health insurance purposes under
SHBP. Notwithstanding the availability of health care services available
through the military, employees may want to continue coverage under
the State Health Benefit Program (SHBP) for themselves or their
dependents.
For
a Local employee in the SHBP, coverage terminates on the last day
of the first month for which the employee received no salary payment.
The employer may elect to permit the employee to continue their
benefit coverage from the SHBP for up to nine months for themselves
and eligible dependents by repaying the full cost of the coverage
to the employer in advance. If the employee is still on leave beyond
the time for which coverage has been purchased, coverage may then
be extended under COBRA for a period not to exceed 18 months. If
the employer does not offer this payment option while on leave,
then the employee may elect to continue coverage under COBRA for
a maximum time period of 18 months.
Employees
and/or dependents have the right to continue their SHBP benefits
under COBRA for the full 18 months. In these cases, the employees
need not be covered. A dependent may independently elect to continue
benefits under COBRA.
Upon
return to employment, the employee must complete an SHBP enrollment
application to reinstate benefits. The coverage is reinstated on
the actual date of return to employment.
Please
contact the Office of Client Services at (609) 292-7524 or e-mail
us at pensions.nj@treas.state.nj.us
if you have any questions about this subject.
attachments:
Request for USERRA - Eligible
Service
Waiver of State
Health Benefits Program Coverage While on Military Duty
September
2001
TO: Certifying
Officer’s of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement System
FROM: Thomas
P. Bryan, Director
Subject:
Conversion of PERS Service Credit to PFRS Service Credit
Acting
Governor DiFrancesco signed Chapter 201, P.L. 2001, into law on
August 8, 2001. This law converts all of the service credit earned
in the Public Employees’ retirement System (PERS) to full Police
and Firemen’s Retirement System (PFRS) service credit for members
who transferred to the PFRS under the provisions of Chapter 247,
P.L. 1993. The new law also requires the reimbursement of any payments
made by PFRS members who opted to pay for the conversion of their
PERS service to PFRS service under the provisions of Chapter 247.
There
is no cost to the member or the employer for this benefit enhancement.
The law provides for funding of the benefit with excess assets from
the PFRS fund.
Those
members already retired who did not pay the cost to convert PERS
service to PFRS service will have their retirement allowance recalculated.
The law will be effective on the first of the month following ninety
days after enactment. Therefore, it will affect all retirements
beginning December 1, 2001.
The
Division of Pensions and Benefits will take the following steps
to implement this law.
- Notifying
all affected retirees of the increase in retirement benefits
caused by this law. (A copy of the letter sent to retirees who
do not have a PFRS loan is attached for information purposes
only).
- Notifying,
through the employer, all active employees affected by this
law. (A copy of the letter sent to active employees who do not
have a PFRS loan is attached for information purposes only).
- Instructing
employers to stop payroll deductions for members still paying
the liability for converting their PERS service to PFRS service
under Chapter 247. A certification of payroll deductions will
be sent for each affected member to stop these deductions effective
September 30, 2001 (September 28 check for employees paid by
State Centralized Payroll). If the member is also paying for
the purchase of additional service credit through arrears, the
balance due on that purchase will be separated and recertified
effective October 1, 2001. Payments must be stopped on a specific
future date so refunds can be calculated accurately.
- Refunding
payments made by PFRS members to convert their PERS service
to PFRS service under Chapter 247. If the member or retiree
has a PFRS loan, then the refund will be applied to the loan
balance. Revised loan certifications will be sent to employers,
as necessary, to stop or adjust the loan repayment schedule.
- Recalculating
retirement allowances of members and, where appropriate, survivors,
of PFRS members who retired with Chapter 247 benefits. Changes
will appear in the January 1, 2002 check.
If
you have any questions, please call the Office of Client services
at (609) 292-7524.
attachment
A
attachment B
Text
of letter to active employees transferred to PFRS under the provisions
of Ch 247, P.L. 1993 who did not convert PERS service to PFRS service.
Dear
(Active Employee),
Acting
Governor DiFrancesco signed Chapter 201, P.L. 2001, into law on
August 8, 2001. This law converts all of your service credit earned
in the Public Employees’ retirement System (PERS) to service credit
in the Police and Firemen’s Retirement System (PFRS). This means
that when you retire, you will be entitled to receive the full benefits
under the PFRS rather than partial benefits from both the PERS and
the PFRS.
The
law will be effective on the first of the month following ninety
days after enactment. Therefore, it will affect all retirements
beginning December 1, 2001. If you retire between now and the effective
date of the law, your benefit will be recalculated when the law
takes effect.
There
is no cost to you for this benefit enhancement. The law provides
for funding of the benefit with excess assets from the PFRS fund.
If
you have any questions, please call the Office of Client services
at (609) 292-7524.
Text
of letter to retirees were transferred to PFRS under the provisions
of Chapter 247, P.L. 1993 who will have their retirement allowance
changed due to Chapter 201, P.L. 2001.
Dear
(Retiree),
Acting
Governor DiFrancesco signed into law a bill that will enhance your
monthly retirement benefit. Chapter 201, P.L. 2001, signed on August
8, 2001, converts all of your service credit earned in the Public
Employees’ retirement System (PERS) to service credit in the Police
and Firemen’s Retirement System (PFRS). When you retired, we calculated
your pension using the PERS formula for your PERS service credit
and the PFRS formula for your PFRS service credit. We then added
the two benefits together to produce your monthly retirement allowance.
Since the PFRS retirement formula provides a significantly higher
retirement benefit than that of the PERS, your retirement allowance
will increase when we recalculate your retirement allowance using
all PFRS service credit.
The
law will be effective on the first of the month following ninety
days after enactment, December 1, 2001. Therefore, you will see
your first enhanced benefit payment in your retirement allowance
check for December, which will be dated January 1, 2002. There is
no provision in the law for any retroactive adjustment to benefits.
If you are now receiving a Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA), your
COLA will also increase because it is based on a percentage of your
enhanced retirement benefit. Prior to you receiving your increased
benefit, we will send you a revised summary of your retirement benefits
that will include information on the amount of your enhanced benefit
as well as any survivor’s benefit payable.
If
you chose an option on your PERS Application for Retirement Allowance
to leave a pension benefit to a beneficiary upon your death, that
PERS death benefit eligibility will cease on December 1, 2001. Instead,
you will have the death benefits that other PFRS retirees have.
The PFRS provides a pension of 50% of final compensation to your
spouse upon your death plus an additional pension to your unmarried
children under age 18. It also provides life insurance equal to
half of your final compensation.
There
is no cost to you for this benefit enhancement. The law provides
for funding of the benefit with excess assets from the PFRS fund.
If
you have any questions, please call the Office of Client services
at (609) 292-7524.
September
2001
TO:
Certifying
Officers
Teachers' Pensions and Annuity Fund
FROM:
John D. Megariotis
Assistant
Director, Finance
SUBJECT:
Member Contribution Rate Change
Chapter
133, P.L. 2001 decreases the rate of pension contributions for TPAF
members to 3 percent of salary effective January 1, 2002. This TPAF
employee contribution rate will remain in effect through 2002 and
will continue there after as long as the excess assets of the TPAF
permit. This is not a permanent change in the normal contribution
rate of 5 percent of salary. Therefore, the minimum repayment for
pension loans and the minimum deduction for the purchase of service
credit, which is based on the full 5 percent contribution rate,
will not change.
If
you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
Division's Audit/Billing Section at (609) 292-3630.
September
2001
TO:
Participating
State Health Benefits Program Local Government Employers
and Independent State Authorities that Pay Post-Retirement Medical
Costs for Retirees
FROM: Janice
F. Nelson
Deputy
Director
SUBJECT: Local
Group Rate Actions for Retiree Coverage – Local Government Employers
This
memorandum details the actions taken by the State Health Benefits
Commission on June 29, 2001 concerning State Health Benefits Program
(SHBP) rates and plan changes that affect retirees. For simplicity,
this memorandum will only address the rate actions that apply to
the retired coverage rates for Local Government Employers and Independent
State Authorities. All rate actions are effective January 1,
2002 and are based upon the recommendation of the Commission’s
actuarial consultant, Milliman USA.
Unfortunately,
medical trend rates for employer-sponsored health plans are returning
to levels not seen since the early 1990s. This is occurring nationally,
and New Jersey is not exempt from the forces driving these costs.
Health care trend is the forecasted percentage change in a health
plan’s per capita claim cost. Factors such as utilization, improvements
in technology, general inflation, mandated benefits, and changes
in the mix of services are all components of trend. Nationally,
industry experts have been reporting trends of 9%-15% for medical
plans. Prescription drug plans are reporting trends of 18-20% for
active employees and retirees younger than age 65. Higher trends
are expected for retirees age 65 and older.
Milliman
USA reports that both medical and prescription drug trends experienced
by the SHBP in its largest plans were higher than anticipated at
the last renewal analysis. This means that the claims experience
for the group has been worse than expected. This pattern of higher
trends is consistent with the nationwide results of other employers
with similar programs, and is a result of increased utilization
and higher medical costs resulting from factors such as continued
advances in medical technology. In addition, the new rates had to
take into account three additional months of trend due to the one-time
use of an 18 month rating period (July 2000 through December 2001)
instead of the usual 12 month period to transition SHBP rates from
a fiscal to a calendar year basis. As a result of incorporating
the three months of additional trend, the 2002 calendar year rate
increases are higher by approximately 2% on medical coverage and
5% on prescription drug coverage.
It
was necessary that the Commission approve the recommended increases
in order to ensure that the State Health Benefit Program would have
sufficient premium to cover the anticipated claims for the period.
Since the SHBP self-funds most of its plans, the claims experience
used in projecting 2002 costs are based upon the actual claims experience
of the group. Rates for the self-funded plans are established on
a self-supporting basis without margin or any intent to increase
the plan balances.
Effective
January 1, 2002
|
Plan
Name
|
Non-Medicare
Retirees
|
Medicare
Retirees
|
|
Traditional
Plan
|
30.4%
|
30.5%
|
|
NJ PLUS
|
36.3%
|
21.4%
|
|
Aetna
USHealthcare
|
12.2%
|
23.7%
|
|
Amerihealth
|
16.0%
|
17.7%
|
|
CIGNA
|
14.8%
|
23.7%
|
|
Health
Net (formerly PHS)
|
6.2%
|
9.3%
|
|
Oxford
|
8.3%
|
5.0%
|
|
University
|
13.9%
|
12.8%
|
Prescription
drug coverage through a card plan is included in all medical plans.
Actions
Taken by the State Health Benefits Commission to Control Rising
Costs
The
Commission approved the following plan changes to control rising
costs:
- Change
in the SHBP Traditional and NJ PLUS Retiree Prescription Drug
Card Plan retail pharmacy network – Effective January 1,
2002 retirees covered under this plan will have a customized
network of participating retail pharmacies. The current network
arrangement requires pharmacies in the network to provide brand
name drugs at 13% off the Average Wholesale Price (AWP). Pharmacies
that elect to participate in the new custom network will guarantee
15% off the AWP for brand drugs. These cost savings reduced
the rate increases required for the Traditional Plan and NJ
PLUS Medicare retiree rates by about 1.1-1.6% and are reflected
in the chart above.
A
disruption analysis performed by Horizon Blue Cross and Blue Shield
and Merck-Medco indicates that this modest reduction in retail
pharmacy network size (from 99% of NJ pharmacies to about 90%
of NJ pharmacies) will inconvenience about 5% of our members overall.
These retirees will need to switch to other, nearby pharmacies
to continue to enjoy the benefits of their card plan. The analysis
performed by Horizon and Merck-Medco indicates that 100% of NJ
members will have access to a participating network retail pharmacy
within reasonable distance from their home. Retirees that have
moved out of New Jersey will also continue to enjoy easy access
to a participating retail pharmacy under the custom network.
- Change
in the Traditional Plan and NJ PLUS Retiree Prescription Drug
Card Co-pays and Out-of-Pockets Maximum – In addition to
the change in the retail pharmacy network detailed above, the
Commission approved changes in the Traditional Plan and NJ PLUS
retiree prescription drug pilot plan co-payments and out-of-pocket
maximums as required by NJAC 17:9-6.10. Effective January 1,
2002, retail co-payments for retirees enrolled in the Traditional
Plan and NJ PLUS will be as follows: $5 generic, $11 preferred
brand and $21 non-preferred brand for a 30 day supply (an increase
of $1 in both brand drug categories). Mail-order co-payments
will also go up by $1 for the brand drug categories ($5 generic,
$16 preferred brand, $26 non-preferred brand). The annual out-of-pocket
maximum for prescription drug expenses will increase from $300
to $345.
- Change
in Prescription Drug Benefits Provided by HMOs –The Commission
has updated the retiree prescription drug benefit provided by
SHBP HMOs to a 3-tier design to encourage the use of less expensive
brand name drugs when multi-source drugs are available. HMOs
will provide prescription cards with retail pharmacy co-pays
of $5/$10/$20 (generic/preferred brand/non-preferred brand)
and appropriate co-pays for mail order. Milliman USA has indicated
that the change in retiree co-pays reduced the HMO rates for
Medicare retirees by about 1.5%. This reduction is reflected
in the HMO rate actions listed above.
Since
Horizon HMO has been eliminated from the medical plans offered by
the SHBP, Horizon HMO members will receive a direct mailing informing
them of the elimination of the HMO. No action is required unless
they wish to select another plan other than NJ PLUS. Horizon HMO
members who do not complete an application during open enrollment
to transfer to another health plan will automatically be transferred
to NJ PLUS effective January 1, 2002.
Please
be assured the State Health Benefits Commission shares your concern
about rising health care costs and your commitment to provide high
quality health plans to employees and retirees at the best available
price.
Calendar
Year 2002 SHBP rate charts are attached. Information concerning
plan and rate changes will be sent to retirees this fall.
If
you have questions, contact Client Services at (609) 292-7524 or
call the Employer Hotline at (609) 777-1082 and leave a message.
A staff member will return your call on the next business day.
September
2001
TO:
Participating
State Health Benefits Program Local Education Employers
FROM: Janice
F. Nelson
Deputy Director
SUBJECT: Local
Group Rate Actions – Education Employers
This
memorandum details the actions taken by the State Health Benefits
Commission on June 29, 2001 concerning State Health Benefits Program
(SHBP) plan changes and rates. For simplicity, this memorandum will
only address the rate actions that apply to the active employee
rates for Local Education Employers. All rate actions are effective
January 1, 2002 and are based upon the recommendation of the
Commission’s actuarial consultant, Milliman USA.
Unfortunately,
medical trend rates for employer-sponsored health plans are returning
to levels not seen since the early 1990s. This is occurring nationally,
and New Jersey is not exempt from the forces driving these costs.
Health care trend is the forecasted percentage change in a health
plan’s per capita claim cost. Factors such as utilization, improvements
in technology, general inflation, mandated benefits, and changes
in the mix of services are all components of trend. Nationally,
industry experts have been reporting trends of 9%-15% for medical
plans. Prescription drug plans are reporting trends of 18-20% for
active employees and retirees younger than age 65. Higher trends
are expected for retirees age 65 and older. A recent annual survey
in the August 15th issue of Managed Healthcare Market
Report indicates that employers are reporting 15% increases in their
managed care plans for 2002, with Texas, Florida, New Jersey, Ohio,
Iowa, and Alabama experiencing the worst increases.
Milliman
USA reports that both medical and prescription drug trends experienced
by the SHBP in its largest plans were higher than anticipated at
the last renewal analysis. This means that the claims experience
for the group has been worse than expected. This pattern of higher
trends is consistent with the nationwide results of other employers
with similar programs, and is a result of increased utilization
and higher medical costs resulting from factors such as continued
advances in medical technology. In addition, the new rates had to
take into account three additional months of trend due to the one-time
use of an 18 month rating period (July 2000 through December 2001)
instead of the usual 12 month period to transition SHBP rates from
a fiscal to a calendar year basis. As a result of incorporating
the three months of additional trend, the 2002 calendar year rate
increases are higher by approximately 2% on the medical plans and
5% on the prescription drug plans.
It
was necessary that the Commission approve the recommended increases
in order to ensure that the State Health Benefit Program would have
sufficient premium to cover the anticipated claims for the period.
Since the SHBP self-funds most of its plans, the claims experience
used in projecting 2002 costs are based upon the actual claims experience
of the group. Rates for the self-funded plans are established on
a self-supporting basis without margin or any intent to increase
the plan balances.
Effective
January 1, 2002
|
For
employers that provide a separate prescription drug card
plan (no coverage for prescription drugs is provided
through the SHBP medical plans)
|
For
employers that do not provide a separate prescription drug
card plan (coverage for prescription drugs is provided
through the SHBP medical plans)
|
|
Plan
Name
|
Rate
Action
|
Plan
Name
|
Rate
Action
|
|
NJ PLUS
|
12.0%
|
NJ
PLUS
|
8.5%
|
|
Traditional
Plan
|
22.0%
|
Traditional
Plan
|
24.5%
|
|
Aetna
USHealthcare
|
8.7%
|
Aetna
USHealthcare
|
11.7%
|
|
Amerihealth
|
12.2%
|
Amerihealth
|
16.0%
|
|
CIGNA
|
12.4%
|
CIGNA
|
14.5%
|
|
Health
Net (formerly PHS)
|
8.6%
|
Health
Net (formerly PHS)
|
6.2%
|
|
Oxford
|
9.4%
|
Oxford
|
8.2%
|
|
University
|
13.1%
|
University
|
14.1%
|
|
SHBP
Employee Prescription Card Plan
|
17.4%
|
******NA*****
|
|
Actions
Taken by the State Health Benefits Commission to Control Rising
Costs
The
Commission approved the following plan changes to help control rising
costs:
- Change
in the SHBP Employee Prescription Drug Card Plan retail pharmacy
network – Effective October 1, 2001 employees covered under
this plan will have a customized network of participating retail
pharmacies. The current network arrangement requires pharmacies
in the network to provide brand name drugs at 13% off the Average
Wholesale Price (AWP). Pharmacies that elect to participate
in the new custom network will guarantee 15% off the AWP for
brand drugs. These cost savings reduced the rate increase required
for the prescription drug card plan by about 2.7%, and are reflected
in the chart above.
|