34 N.J. Reg. 208(a)
NEW JERSEY REGISTER
VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1
MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 2002
RULE PROPOSAL
LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY
DIVISION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
RULES PERTAINING TO THE FAMILY LEAVE ACT
DISABILITY LEAVE; EMPLOYER
Proposed Amendment: N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.2
Reproposed Repeal and New Rule: N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6
Authorized By: Jeffrey Burstein, Acting Director, New Jersey Division on Civil Rights.
Authority: N.J.S.A. 34:11B-1 to 16.
Calendar Reference: See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar
requirements ..
Proposal Number: PRN 2002-4.
Submit comments by March 8, 2002 to:
Estelle Bronstein
Department of Law and Public Safety
Division on Civil Rights
Bureau of Policy
PO Box 089
140 East Front Street
Trenton, NJ 08625-0089
The agency proposal follows:
Summary
The New Jersey Division on Civil Rights (Division), in the Department of Law
and Public Safety, enforces the New Jersey Family Leave Act (NJFLA),
N.J.S.A. 34:11B-1 to 16. On September 16, 1991 the Division promulgated
rules necessary for the implementation and enforcement of the NJFLA,
N.J.A.C. 13:14. These rules were readopted without amendment effective
September 16, 1996. On May 21, 2001, at 33 N.J.R. 1495(a), the Division
proposed to readopt these rules with amendments and to repeal N.J.A.C.
13:14-1.6, Disability leave, and adopt a new N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6. The
Division received no comments from the public regarding the published proposal.
However, after further review, the Division found that proposed new N.J.A.C.
13:14-1.6 contained language that might be subject to an interpretation
contrary to the intent of the proposal. For this reason, on September 4, 2001,
at 33 N.J.R. 3030(a), the Division readopted the rules with only a portion of
the proposed amendments published at 33 N.J.R. 1495(a). The Division did not
adopt the repeal of N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6, did not adopt proposed new
N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6, and did not adopt the proposed amendment deleting the
definition of "disability leave" in N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.2. The modifications
necessary to clarify the new N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6 require republication
pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:30-6.3(a). Accordingly, the Division now proposes a
revised new rule N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6, and reproposes the repeal of the
existing N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6 and the deletion of the definition of disability
leave found in N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.2. In addition, further review disclosed
that the definition of "employer" in N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.2 may be subject to an
interpretation inconsistent with the definition of "employer" in the NJFLA.
N.J.S.A. 34:11B-3(f). Accordingly, to ensure that the rules define covered
employers as specified in the NJFLA, the Division now proposes amendment of
N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.2 to more closely follow the language in the statutory
definition of "employer."
Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:30-3.3(a)5, the within proposal is excepted from
the requirement that it be included in a previously published rulemaking
calendar, as a 60-day public comment period is being provided.
The NJFLA entitles most employees in the State to a maximum of 12 weeks family
leave from employment in any 24-month period. Under the NJFLA, eligible
employees may take a family leave within one year of the birth or adoption of a
child, or because of the serious health condition of a child, parent, or
spouse. Employees returning from family leave are entitled to be restored to
the position held prior to the leave or to an equivalent position of like
seniority, status, employment benefits, pay and other terms and conditions of
employment.
The rule here proposed for amendment and the new rule will continue to provide
principles for interpretation of the NJFLA's various provisions consistent with
the Legislature's intent, and will provide continued guidance to employers and
employees who have duties and rights under the NJFLA. The amendment and new
rule clarify the manner in which the NJFLA relates to other laws.
On the Federal level, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), 29
U.S.C. 2601 et seq., allows eligible employees of a covered employer
to take
job protected, unpaid leave for up to a total of 12 weeks in any 12 month
period. Under the FMLA, leave may be taken in connection with the birth or
adoption of a child, or the placement of a child with the employee for adoption
or foster care, or the serious health condition of a family member, or because
the employee's own serious health condition makes the employee unable to
perform the functions of his or her job. The U.S. Labor Department's Wage and
Hour Division promulgated final rules under the FMLA, effective February 6,
1995. 29 C.F.R. 825. Although the Division's rules predate these Federal
protections, the Division's rules are largely consistent with the Federal
rules. Nevertheless, because the substantive provisions of the FMLA and the
NJFLA differ in several important respects, the Division's rules have provided
important guidance to employers in interpreting and complying with the NJFLA.
The proposed repeal of N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6 and proposed adoption of a new
N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6 clarify the manner in which the NJFLA relates to leaves
granted by other laws, such as the Federal FMLA. The proposed new rule includes
examples to show that, when the NJFLA and another law provide leaves for the
same purpose, the leaves are regarded as concurrent, and the employee exhausts
both Federal and State leave entitlements. However, an employee who takes leave
under another law for a purpose not covered by the NJFLA does not forfeit the
right to subsequently take leave under the NJFLA for a reason covered by the
NJFLA.
The proposed new rule also clarifies the relation of the NJFLA to the
Temporary Disability Benefits Law, as is set forth in the NJFLA. The NJFLA
provides that leave granted under the NJFLA is "in addition to and shall not
abridge nor conflict with, any rights" granted by the Temporary Disability
Benefits Law. N.J.S.A. 34:11B-13. The Temporary Disability Benefits Law
provides benefit payments to partially replace wages lost when an individual is
unable to perform the duties of a job due to the employee's own disability,
either while employed or during unemployment. N.J.S.A. 43:21-26. While the
Temporary Disability Benefits Law provides for partial wage replacement, it
does not establish any right to "disability leave" from a job.
To clarify this distinction, the Division proposes to repeal N.J.A.C.
13:14-1.6, which provides that "disability leave" is separate from and in
addition to any leave granted under the NJFLA. The Division also proposes to
amend N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.2 to delete the definition of "disability leave," as
it will no longer be relevant to any provision of the rules under the proposed
repeal of N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6 and adoption of new N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6.
Instead, the proposed new N.J.A.C. 13:14-1.6 includes a subsection which
clarifies that any employee's receipt of payments under the Temporary
Disability Benefits Law does not limit or impair the employee's right to job
protected leave to care for a covered family member, and provides examples to
clarify the relation of leaves granted under the NJFLA with other Federal and
State law.
Social Impact
The proposed amendment and new rule will have a beneficial social impact upon
all eligible employees in the State of New Jersey. The amendment and new rule
implement the stated purpose of the Legislature in promoting the economic
security of families by guaranteeing jobs to employees who choose to take a
leave due to the birth or adoption of a child or because of the serious health
condition of a family member.
The amendment and new rule also recognize the practical difficulties facing
employers in providing the leave required by the NJFLA and, therefore, make
provisions to protect employers from possible employee abuse. Moreover, the
amendment and new rule will have a beneficial social impact in that they will
promote compliance with the law and will clarify provisions of the NJFLA which
may be the cause of confusion among employers and employees regarding the types
and terms of leave permitted.
Economic Impact
The proposed amendment and new rule will not economically impact employers to
a degree greater than they are presently impacted by the NJFLA. Moreover, the
economic impact to employers will be minimal since the NJFLA and the rules only
require employers to grant unpaid leave to eligible employees. Additionally,
the rules have no economic impact on employers with fewer than 50 employees
since these small businesses are exempt from the NJFLA.
Federal Standards Statement
A Federal standards analysis is not required because the proposed amendment
and new rule are intended to clarify and interpret the New Jersey Family Leave
Act, and are not intended to implement or comply with any program established
under Federal law or under a State statute that incorporates or refers to
Federal law, standards or requirements. While there is substantial overlap
between the FMLA and the NJFLA, the amendment and new rule are designed to
facilitate enforcement and compliance with the New Jersey Family Leave Act, and
are not governed or affected by the FMLA. Further, the amendment and new rule
are specifically intended to clarify the ways in which the NJFLA differs,
substantively and procedurally, from the Federal statute.
Jobs Impact
The proposed amendment and new rule will not result in the generation or loss
of jobs.
Agriculture Industry Impact
The proposed amendment and new rule will not have an impact on the agriculture
industry.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The proposed amendment and new rule will not impose any reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on small businesses, as the term is defined in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-16 et seq. The rules apply to
businesses with 50 or more employees. The amendment and new rule do not impose
any reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements on covered
employers, or other compliance requirements beyond the compliance requirements
imposed by the NJFLA itself. Any recordkeeping which may be generated by the
NJFLA is minimal and should be able to be performed by an employer's current
personnel or benefits officer. Even if some employers hire temporary employees
to assume the duties normally performed by the employees who are on leave,
since the NJFLA does not require the employer to pay the employee who is on
leave, the rules do not require the employer to pay two employees while using a
temporary employee to replace an employee on family leave.
Full text of the proposal follows :
<< NJ ADC 13:14-1.2 >>
13:14-1.2 Definitions
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following
meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
...
<<-"Disability leave" means any period of leave for which the employee is disabled
(that is, unable to perform his or her work) including, but not limited to, any period
of time during which an employee is collecting disability benefits.->>
...
"Employer" means an employer as defined in the Act which employs 50 or more employees,
whether employed in New Jersey or not, <<-who have worked->> <<+for+>> each working day
<<-for->> <<+during each of+>> 20 or more <<+calendar+>> workweeks <<+in+>> <<-during->>
the <<+then+>> current or immediately preceding calendar year.
...
<< NJ ADC 13:14-1.6 >>
13:14-1.6 <<-Disability leave->> <<+Relation with other laws+>>
<<-Disability leave is separate from, and in addition to, any family leave provided by
the Act.->>
<<+(a) Where an employee requests leave for a reason covered by both the Act and
another law, the leave simultaneously counts against the employee's entitlement under
both laws. For example, the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C.
2601 et seq., provides leave to care for a seriously ill spouse and
the Act also provides leave for that reason. Under this example, since the leave is
taken for a purpose covered by both the FMLA and the Act, the leave simultaneously
counts against the employee's entitlement under both laws.+>>
<<+(b) Medical or disability leave granted under other laws, but not granted under the
Act, shall not abridge an employee's right to leave or other protections granted under
the Act. For example, the FMLA provides leave for an employee's own disability, but
disability leaves are not covered by the Act. Some situations which may arise under this
example include, but are not limited to:+>>
<<+1. If an employee first takes FMLA leave because of his or her own disability,
including a disability related to pregnancy or childbirth, the employee would be
entitled to an additional 12 weeks of leave within 24 months under the Act to care for a
seriously ill family member or newly born or adopted child, because the prior disability
leave was taken for a purpose not covered by the Act;+>>
<<+2. If an employee takes FMLA leave because of his or her own disability, including
a disability related to pregnancy or childbirth, and a family member becomes seriously
ill or a child is born or adopted while he or she is still on FMLA disability leave,
the intervening birth, adoption or serious family illness does not convert the FMLA
leave to a leave under the Act. For as long as the employee continues to be eligible for
FMLA leave based on his or her own disability, the leave does not simultaneously count
against the employee's entitlement under the Act.+>>
<<+(c) An employee retains all rights under the Temporary Disability Benefits Law,
N.J.S.A. 43:21-25 et seq., when taking leave under the Act, and an employee's receipt of
disability benefits or other compensation does not limit or impair the employee's right
to take leave to care for a covered family member under the Act while receiving such
benefits. For example, if an employee is receiving temporary disability benefits based
on a post-partum medical condition, but has exhausted her Federal FMLA leave, she is
entitled to begin her twelve weeks of leave under the Act to care for her newly born
child, even though she is still disabled as defined by the Temporary Disability Benefits
Law and is receiving compensation under that law.+>>
34 N.J.R. 208(a)
END OF DOCUMENT
|