|
The AMA is designed to capture revenue equitably from
all companies with an economic presence in New Jersey, including
out-of-state companies that now pay no corporate taxes. Companies
will pay either the AMA or the Corporation Business Tax -- whichever
is greater. |
|
To protect small businesses, the first $2 million
in gross receipts and $1 million in gross profits would be exempt
from the AMA. This threshold excludes approximately 70 percent of
existing corporate business taxpayers from the AMA. |
|
Sub-Chapter S Corporations are entirely exempt from
the AMA. Professional corporations are also exempt from the AMA. |
|
Other protections for small businesses
remain, including an immediate tax cut of 13 percent for 20,000
small businesses. |
|
In addition to more favorable treatment under the
AMA, the reform proposal still includes an expansion of the job
creation tax credit to include more mid-sized companies. |
|
The final AMA formula allows businesses with gross
receipts of up to $20 million to exclude a portion of gross receipts
or gross profits from the AMA on a phase-out basis. |
|
Companies with more than $20 million in gross receipts/$10 million
in gross profits would pay an AMA rate on total gross receipts/profits
based on a graduated table.
|
|
The AMA would sunset for in-state corporations by
June 30, 2006. The AMA would remain in place for out-of-state corporations
do business in New Jersey but are not subject to the CBT. |
|
The AMA would be capped at $20 million for a group
of related companies. |
Will
any companies still pay the $200 minimum CBT?
|
No. The $200 minimum is being replaced. Two minimum
CBT fees of $500 and $2000 would be established. All corporations
would pay the $500 minimum, except corporations affiliated with
groups or parent companies that have payrolls of $5 million or more
would pay the $2,000 CBT minimum. |
How
will the changes close tax loopholes?
|
The Corporate tax reforms close several major loopholes
cited by tax experts and economists as ones used by major and multi-state
corporations to erase their net income on paper and make it possible
to avoid New Jersey corporate taxes. |
Royalties
|
The reforms disallow royalty payments as a deduction
from New Jersey's CBT, when those royalty payments are made to a
parent or affiliated company. New Jersey is home to multi-state
companies that have considerable assets, including intellectual
property assets such as trademarks. As a tax avoidance strategy,
some companies have created business affiliates in other states
- Delaware in particular - that do not tax royalty income. |
|
Then, the out-of-state affiliate charges the New Jersey
company a licensing fee for the use of the trademark. This allows
the New Jersey company to write off the royalties as a business
expense, thus lowering its profits and reducing or eliminating its
CBT liability. |
|
In a very real sense, they pay themselves, write it
off as a business expense, and then use the transaction to lower
their tax liability in New Jersey. Closing this loophole captures
revenues that would otherwise escape through this tax avoidance. |
Interest
Income
|
Interest expenses are currently deductible from the
net income reported to New Jersey under the CBT. Corporations can
shelter taxable profit by shipping it to subsidiaries or affiliated
companies in other states that have less tax or no tax. This is
done through interest paid by the New Jersey company on a "loan"
from an out-of-state affiliate. |
|
The reforms close this loophole, yet maintain the
deduction for legitimate cases in which an interest-paying corporation
is a guarantor of a loan to a third party. |
|
Under our reforms, 100 percent of the interest paid
to affiliate entities would be added back into net income reported
to the CBT. |
Throwout
Rule
|
New Jersey has no Throwout or Throwback Rule. Multi-state
corporations that earn income in many states must allocate a share
of the income for taxation in New Jersey. The larger the amount
of sales earned in other jurisdictions, the smaller the share of
income apportioned to and taxable in New Jersey. Companies with
sales in other jurisdictions where they are not taxed can nevertheless
count those untaxed sales in their national totals and thereby lower
the income apportioned to New Jersey. |
|
A Throwout Rule means if sales earned in other jurisdictions
are not taxed there, they cannot be counted when computing the fraction
of total taxable income subject to New Jersey tax. The original
CBT reform proposal called for the enactment of a full Throwout
Rule. The now-amended reform provide a $5 million cap, thus limiting
the impact the new Throwout Rule can have on any group of companies. |
Ending
Exclusions
|
The CBT reforms also level the playing field by ending
special tax advantages enjoyed by select types of companies. Investment
companies enjoy a preferred tax status under the CBT. New Jersey
defines an investment company as a business engaged in managing
its own portfolio. The CBT defines the taxable income of such companies
as just 25 percent of their entire net income. The reforms raise
the taxable income to 40 percent of net income. |
|
The same fairness principle applies in
subjecting Savings and Loan Associations to the Corporation Business
Tax. Unlike most other financial institutions, S&Ls currently
pay no CBT. Instead, they pay only an annual excise tax equal to
3 percent of net income. That tax was enacted in 1973. The reforms
bring S&Ls in line with what other depositary institutions pay
- the 9 percent CBT. |
Dividends
|
Companies that receive dividends from subsidiaries
in which they own an 80-percent interest or more are currently permitted
to exclude dividend income from taxation. Companies receiving dividends
from subsidiaries in which they own less than an 80 percent share
must report as taxable income 50 percent of the dividend income.
|
|
Initial reforms deemed all dividends as fully taxable,
providing an incentive for companies to voluntarily file federal
consolidated tax returns. Subsequent changes to the reforms restored
the current law on the exclusion of subsidiaries if the parent company
has a 50 percent or greater ownership interest. |
|
Loopholes are closed without adversely affecting corporations
that receive legitimate dividend revenues: |
|
1)
|
Dividends from 80-percent owned and operated
subsidiaries will remain tax-free, as they are currently. |
|
2)
|
Dividends from subsidiaries in which the parent company
owns an interest of between 50 percent and 80 percent will be 50
percent taxable, as they are currently. |
|
3)
|
Dividends from subsidiaries in which the parent company
owns less than a 50 percent share will be 100 percent taxable. Under
current law, only 50 percent of these dividends are taxable. |
What
other components make up the corporate tax reforms?
Net Operating Losses (NOLs)
|
Loophole closures represent long-term, sustained reforms
to restore our CBT to its status as a viable revenue source for
New Jersey. Suspension of the carry forward of net operating losses,
or NOLs, provides more immediate budgetary relief to address the
State's current fiscal crisis. |
|
Net Operating Loss rules allow companies
to reduce their corporate business tax payments by deducting Net
Operating Losses for a period of up to seven years. Our legislation
will defer this accounting procedure for two years. |
|
Delaying this rule means only that companies
that earn a profit this year will pay tax this year and will not
carry forward losses from as far back as seven years ago to reduce
their tax this year. While NOLs are deferred for two years, two
years are also added to the back end of the existing seven-year
period. Thus, ultimately no company will lose the opportunity to
write off those losses from prior years. |
Processing
Fee
|
The reforms allow New Jersey to assess a $150 processing
fee for Limited Liability Partnerships and Limited Liability Corporations.
The fee would be assessed for each K-1 form filed by a member/partner
with the State. Partnerships fewer than three members would be exempt
from the fee. Partnerships would not be subject to the $150 K-1
filing fee if they do not derive income in New Jersey. The clarification
ensures that there are no financial disincentives for out-of-state
partnerships to accept New Jersey partners. |
|
The State estimates that half of K-1s filed in New
Jersey come from out of state residents who are involved in New
Jersey LLCs, LLPs and Partnerships. |
Prepayment
of third quarter taxes in 2003
|
A one-time prepayment of third quarter taxes in 2003
would be due by June 15 for those companies with $50 million or
more in sales. |
|
· The prepayment would affect only New Jersey's
largest companies, while providing revenue to offset the partial
exclusion of dividend taxation, which benefits many large corporations. |
|