a.
Overview
This
document is the Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program for the state of New Jersey for federal fiscal
years 2003 (beginning October 1, 2002) through 2005.
The
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
serves two purposes. First, it presents a comprehensive,
one-volume guide to major transportation improvements
planned in the state of New Jersey and will, therefore,
provide a valuable reference for implementing agencies
(such as the New Jersey Department of Transportation
and the New Jersey Transit Corporation) and all those
interested in transportation issues in this state. Second,
it serves as the reference document required under federal
regulations (23 CFR 450.216) for use by the Federal
Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration
in approving the use of federal funds for transportation
projects in New Jersey.
The
federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(TEA-21) requires that each state develop one multimodal
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
for all areas of the state. In New Jersey, the STIP
consists of a listing of statewide line items, programs,
and the regional Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) projects, all of which were developed by the three
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). The MPO
TIPs contain local and state highway projects, statewide
line items and programs, as well as proposed public
transit projects.
This
STIP conforms toand in many cases exceedsthe
specific requirements of the federal regulations:
- It
lists the priority projects programmed for each year
of the first three years of the planning period.
- It
is fiscally constrained. A detailed discussion of
fiscal constraint issues is found in subsection j
below.
- It
contains all regionally significant projects regardless
of funding source.
-
It contains all projects programmed for federal funds.
-
It contains, for information, state funded projects.
- It
contains expanded descriptive informationconsiderably
more than required by the federal regulationsas
described in subsection l" below.
b.
Public participation process
New Jersey is completely covered by three Metropolitan
Planning Organizations (MPOs): the Delaware Valley Regional
Planning Commission (DVRPC), the South Jersey Transportation
Planning Organization (SJTPO), and the North Jersey
Transportation Planning Authority Inc. (NJTPA). The
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
includes the three MPO Transportation Improvement Programs
(TIPs) without modification.
Each
MPO has a public participation process for their Transportation
Plan, TIP and conformity determination. The State made
copies of the STIP available for each MPO public meeting
and representatives from the NJDOT and NJ TRANSIT were
present to answer questions and concerns raised by the
public on our program. The public comment period for
each MPO TIP and the STIP ran for a period of 30 days.
c.
Statewide Transportation Plan
The New Jersey Department of Transportation completed
updating of the multi-modal State Long Range Transportation
Living Plan in March 2001 with delivery
of the first phase document Transportation Choices 2025
to the New Jersey State Legislature. The NJDOT engaged
in this process in collaboration with NJ Transit, the
state's three Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs),
the state's other transportation authorities and commissions,
other state departments, various stakeholders and the
general public. The Plan development process is a key
part of the state's long range transportation planning
process by providing an opportunity for input of new
information from the parties mentioned above. Also,
through current technology in addition to the printed
medium, the plan and planning process are more available
and accessible to specific modal audiences, as well
as the general public, and more readily open to inquiries,
recommendations and informational access and input.
Work
is ongoing on the second phase of the New Jersey Long
Range Transportation Living Plan which is
a continuing process of plan development. It will continue
to engage in dialogue with New Jersey residents, local
officials, metropolitan planning organizations, and
other entities. A high level of communications among
stakeholders will insure that the priorities in the
plan remain relevant and can be adapted to respond to
changing circumstances. Through a mix of technical,
outreach and policy, this second phase of the Living
Plan will establish and define new strategies
for the Living Plan as well as develop and
present new challenges, opportunities and impacts that
will deal with transportation choices which will effect
the quality of life of everyone in New Jersey.
This
second phase of developing the Living Plan
is meant to devise innovative and effective ways of
making the Long Range Plan a continuing planning process
over time, rather than just the preparation of a document
every 5 years. A consulting firm will be hired before
the end of September 2003 to assist the Department.
d.
Conformity for MPO plans and programs
Each MPO Regional Transportation Plan will go through
a conformity analysis that shows the individual MPO
Plans are in conformance with the State Implementation
Plan (SIP). Each MPO TIP must be consistent with their
conforming plan such that the regional emission analysis
performed on the plan applies to their TIP. In general,
this determination means that, in aggregate, the implementation
of projects and programs in the MPO TIPs will have a
positive impact on air quality. Since the STIP contains
the three MPO TIPs without modification, the implementation
of the projects and programs in the STIP, in aggregate,
will also have a positive impact on air quality.
e.
Advance construction projects
Advance Construction (AC) is a procedure to advance
a federally funded project(s) into the current fiscal
year and implement it with other than federal funds.
Use of AC is subject to the availability of other than
federal funds (e.g., state funds) in the year in which
the project is to be implemented, and the availability
of federal funds in the year in which the AC project(s)
is to be converted to a regular federal-aid project.
AC projects are to be listed individually in the TIP
and STIP in both the year that the project is to be
implemented and the year in which the conversion is
to take place. Appropriate notification will be provided
in the TIPs and STIP so it is clearly understood that
these other funds are available and that
future federal funds may be committed to these AC projects.
Fiscal constraint must be maintained throughout this
process for both the implementing and conversion years.
When
AC is used in the development of the TIP/STIP, or to
amend or modify the TIP/STIP, the MPO and the State
will explain the procedure following the public participation
procedures adopted by the MPO. The MPO and the State
agree that in the development and processing of the
TIP/STIP, the inclusion of an AC project in the TIP/STIP
in the year the project is to be implemented signifies
that the project can be converted to federal funding
when federal funds become available and the decision
is made to convert to those funds.
f.
Multi-Year Funding
Multi-year funding is a process whereby the costs
of a phase of work of a project are spread out over
several STIP years. Each of these fiscal years provides
sufficient funding for the anticipated cash flow needs
during that fiscal year. Federal funds are only authorized
after the approval of the indicated STIP annual element.
g.
Development of the STIP
This Statewide Transportation Improvement Program is
the product of months of staff work and deliberations
involving the New Jersey Department of Transportation
(NJDOT), the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ TRANSIT),
county and municipal transportation planners and engineers,
other transportation implementing agencies, and elected
officials at the state, county, and municipal levels.
The main decision-making forums for selecting projects
for this program were the states three metropolitan
planning organizations:
- The
North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA),
covering Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex,
Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex,
Union, and Warren counties.
- The
Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC),
covering Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer
counties.
- The
South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization
(SJTPO), covering Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland,
and Salem counties.
The process of building the current STIP began in the
fall of 2001, with intensive staff work by NJDOT, NJ
TRANSIT, and the MPOs.
All
projects which were identified as potential candidates
for inclusion in the regional transportation improvement
programs of each of the three MPOs were subjected to
intensive screening to verify project scope, status,
schedule, and cost. The resulting pool of
projects was analyzed independently by NJDOT, NJ TRANSIT,
and the MPOs to assign each project a priority based
on the extent to which it would advance identified regional
and statewide objectives, such as objectives set forth
in the state and regional long-range transportation
plans, the New Jersey Capital Investment Strategy, air
quality objectives, and the broad social and economic
goals of the State Development and Redevelopment Plan.
NJDOT developed and circulated revenue projections for
planning purposes to each of the MPOs, based on the
best current assessment of available state, federal,
and other funds. NJDOT, NJ TRANSIT and each of the three
MPOs entered into intensive discussions to negotiate
a list of deliverable transportation projects that best
fit the composite statewide and regional priorities
within a financially constrained program. These negotiated
project lists were used as the basis for publishing
the Proposed Fiscal Year 2003 Transportation Capital
Program by NJDOT on April 1, 2002, and for preparing
TIPs for further analysis by each of the MPOs.
h.
Congestion Management System
All projects in this STIP result from a fully operational
Congestion Management System (CMS) in place at each
MPO.
i.
STIP Modifications and Amendments
The STIP may be modified or amended at anytime according
to the procedures set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) for TIP/STIP changes between the three MPOs, NJ
TRANSIT, and the NJDOT. These MOUs were fully executed
in November of 1999. STIP changes, once approved by
the MPOs in concert with either NJ TRANSIT or the NJDOT,
are forwarded to the FHWA and/or FTA for their approval,
when necessary.
j.
Projected revenues
Federal law and regulations require that the Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) be fiscally
constrained for the first three years. Specifically,
planned federal aid expenditures cannot
exceed projected revenues. The major sources
of funding identified in this document are the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), and the New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund.
NJDOT
has developed an estimate of $8.3 billion in available
state and federal revenues to support the states
transportation budget during the three fiscal years
from FY 2003 through FY 2005. (For planning purposes,
state revenues are estimated on the basis of state fiscal
years, which begin on July 1, and federal revenues are
estimated on the basis of federal fiscal years, which
begin on October 1). This amount constitutes the funding
expected to be available to support the whole FY 2003-FY
2005 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program.
Tables
1 through 3 set out these amounts by year and by funding
category and compare them to the actual amounts programmed
in the TIPs and STIP. Following are the revenue assumptions
used in developing this table:
-
Dollar amounts shown in federal funding categories
in FY 03 are based, except as otherwise noted below,
on the current federal-aid apportionment tables or
equivalent data obtained from the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
as appropriate. Starting in FY 2004, the first year
of a new Federal highway act, there is a 5% increase
anticipated in Federal funds. The FY 2005 federal
funding level remains consistent with FY 2004 levels.
- Funds
in the Surface Transportation Program (STP) category
are broken down into the allocations and minimums
required by federal law.
- High
Priority funds (and some remaining demo
funds) are shown only as authorized by the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) or other
federal act.
- The
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund provides $950
million in FY 2003 to support the Capital Program.
For programming purposes, it is assumed that NJDOTs
share of the Transportation Trust Fund is $580 million
in FY 2003 through FY 2005. NJ TRANSITs share
of the Transportation Trust Fund is $459 million in
FY 2003, and $370 million in FY 2004-2005. Included
in FY 2003 is $89 million of Other State funds which
will become available as a result of refinancing the
original Hudson-Bergen LRT Grant Anticipation notes.
- In
FY 2003, $65 million of FHWA CMAQ funding is to be
flexed to NJ TRANSIT; also $65 million
from both FY 2004 and FY 2005 is projected to be flexed.
With
two notable exceptions, federal and state funds are
not allocated tothat is, required
to be spent within the boundaries ofthe states
three MPOs. The first exception is STP funds, some of
which are required under a formula in TEA-21 to be allocated
to MPOs. These allocated funds are shown in the following
tables as STP-NJTPA, STP-DVRPC,
and STP-SJTPO. The second exception is Trust
Fund state aid funds, which are allocated on a county-by-county
basis under a statutory and regulatory formula.
The
actual budgeting of federal and state funds for projects
within the MPO areas is a product of the development
of the three regional transportation improvement programs,
the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, and
the annual capital program. On a statewide basis, the
cost of projects programmed for a particular fiscal
year must equal the planned resources for that year.
Each project must also be assigned to a funding category
that is appropriate for the project and within which
adequate funding is available. From year to year there
may be significant variations in the amount of funds
actually programmed within an MPO area, as needs and
specific project implementation schedules dictate. These
programming decisions are made on a cooperative basis
with the participation of NJDOT, NJ TRANSIT, local government
representatives, and other agencies (all of whom are
members of the MPOs), the State Legislature, citizens
groups, and the general public.
Table
4 shows the overall distribution of funds within the
STIP by MPO.
Tables
5 through 8 provide more detailed breakdowns of expenditures
by funding category for each of the three MPOs and for
statewide programs
k.
Financing transition projects
Transition projects are projects which
are programmed for implementation in the current (FY
2002-04) TIP/STIP but which, for either scheduling or
obligation authority limitation reasons, are not actually
available for implementation until after October 1,
2002, when the planned (FY 2003-05) TIP/STIP takes effect.
To provide a smooth transition between one TIP/STIP
period and the next, New Jerseys MPOs and appropriate
state and federal agencies have agreed that the first
60 days after approval of the FY 2003-05 STIP will be
considered a transition period, in which projects included
in the FY 2002-04 STIP will be considered eligible for
federal funding actions, even though they are not included
in the FY 2003-05 STIP. This list of Transition
projects will be found in Section VI of the final STIP
document and will be based on current schedule information.
l.
How to use this document
The individual one-page descriptions, found in Sections
III and IV, provide detailed information for each project
or program in the five-year plan. The top portion of
each page lists the project/program name (route and
section) as well as the location. The NJDOT reference
number is assigned at the beginning of a project and
remains with that project until its completion. The
TIP reference number refers to the identification number
assigned by the MPO(s). Other information contained
within the one-page description includes county, municipality,
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) jurisdiction,
mileposts (for state highway projects), structure number
(for bridge projects), the project sponsor, a detailed
description of the project, and program category. An
explanation of the program categories can be found in
the Glossary, located in Section VII of this document.
The
columns at the bottom of each record indicate the anticipated
funding schedule for each project/program. The phases
of work and types of funds are further defined in the
Glossary located in Section VII.