Final Decision
|
Daryle L. Pitts
Complainant
v.
Department of Corrections
Custodian of Record
|
Complaint No. 2003-99
|
At its March 11, 2004 public meeting, the Government Records Council (“Council”) considered the March 11, 2004 Findings and Recommendations of the Executive Director and all related documentation submitted by the parties. The Council voted unanimously to adopt the entirety of said Findings and Recommendations and to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the Complainant signed documentation on February 26, 2004 that he received the requested documents, and there is no cause of action needed by the Government Records Council.
Vincent P. Maltese, Chairman
Government Records Council
I attest the foregoing is a true and accurate record of the Government Records Council.
Virginia Hook, Secretary
Government Records Council
Return to Top
Findings and Recommendations of the Executive Director
Daryle L. Pitts GRC Complaint No. 2003-99
Complainant
v.
Department of Corrections/
Kathleen Wiechnik
Custodian of Records
Relevant Records Requested: Personal Medical Records from 1985 through present
Custodian: Kathleen Wiechnik
Request Made: Various Dates
GRC Complaint filed: July 18, 2003
Recommendations of Executive Director
The complainant was trying to obtain his prison medical records from 1985 through present.
The complainant has signed an Acknowledgement Form that states that he has received the requested documents.
The Executive Director respectfully recommends that the Council dismiss the case because the Complainant has signed documentation on February 26, 2004 that he received the requested documents, therefore there is no cause of action needed by the Government Records Council.
Documents Reviewed
The following documents were reviewed in preparing the Findings and Recommendations for this case:
- July 18, 2003 complaint regarding denial of access
- February 26, 2004 – New Jersey State Prison Acknowledgement form signed by complainant that he received the documents.
- March 2, 2004 Statement of Information
Legal Analysis
Since the Complainant has received his requested documents, no legal analysis is needed.
________________________
Paul F. Dice
Acting Executive Director
Government Records Council
March 7, 2004
Return to Top
|
