Governor Chris Christie • Lt.Governor Kim Guadagno
NJ Home | Services A to Z | Departments/Agencies | FAQs  
State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
DEP Home | About DEP | Index by Topic | Programs/Units | DEP Online 
news releases
NJ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NEWS RELEASE
RELEASE: 4/12/01
01/31
CONTACT: Amy Collings or Sharon A. Southard
609-984-1795 or 609-292-2994

NJDEP DIV. OF FISH & WILDLIFE SEEKS COURT ORDER TO REMOVE TIGERS

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP) Division of Fish & Wildlife has filed papers to obtain a court order to remove all of the tigers from the Tigers Only Preservation Society (TOPS) in Jackson Twp.

If the court order is approved, it would set the stage for the eventual removal of the tigers to a large, vet-staffed facility in Texas after all necessary transportation arrangements have been made.

The papers were submitted this week to the Chancery Division of Superior Court in Ocean County. The order would authorize the state Division of Fish & Wildlife to gain access to the tigers and arrange for their removal to a facility that has agreed to take them. The facility, Wild Animal Orphange (WAO), based in San Antonio, would assist state officials in the transport of the tigers and would ensure their protection for the duration of their lives.

According to state Fish & Wildlife experts, WAO has extensive experience in animal rescues and relocations of this nature. It is a member of the American Sanctuary Association, is licensed by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, and has been acknowledged by the Humane Society of the United States and by the International Fund for Animal Welfare as a facility appropriate for this relocation.

On May 3, 1999, Fish & Wildlife denied a request from Joan Byron Marasek and Jan Marasek to renew the TOPS animal theatrical permit, a permit given to those who own exotic animals for advertising, theatrical or similar purposes. Fish & Wildlife had determined they did not meet the qualifications for a permit, having repeatedly failed to prove that the tigers were being kept for a purpose for which a permit could be issued. In addition, the facility was determined to be inadequate for the number of tigers being housed, and therefore, the welfare of the animals was in jeopardy.

After the permit renewal request was denied, the Maraseks requested an administrative hearing to review DEP's decision. An administrative law judge upheld the permit denial, stating the couple did not show they met the permit criteria and the facility did not provide the tigers with the required, proper living conditions. DEP Commissioner Bob Shinn issued a final decision on the matter based on the judge's findings last June. The Maraseks appealed the decision to the Appellate Division of Superior Court and sought a stay from Commissioner Shinn while the appeal was pending.

Shinn granted the stay with five conditions, but subsequent inspections of the TOPS facility showed two conditions were violated. Inspections showed TOPS failed to separate the tigers to prevent breeding and failed to refrigerate the meat fed to tigers. Therefore, Shinn rescinded the stay, and the Maraseks had 15 days to file a plan to remove the tigers or to appeal the decision. They appealed to the Appellate Division of Superior Court seeking the stay, but the court denied their request in December. At present, no stay is in effect, no plan has been filed by the Maraseks for removal of the tigers, and during recent inspections, Fish & Wildlife personnel observed the tigers breeding.

TOPS is now considered to be in possession of 24 tigers without a permit, and is in violation of the New Jersey Endangered and Nongame Species Conservation Act. Since December, Fish & Wildlife has been developing plans for the relocation of the tigers. The relocation would cost WAO $100,000 to $120,000 with the state possibly paying $55,000 to $60,000 of that sum. The state would attempt to recover its costs from TOPS.

"State regulations are designed to protect the health and well being of exotic animals kept in captivity," said DEP Commissioner Bob Shinn. "The regulatory process also provides an appeals process to give due consideration to the rights of the owners. In this case, no stay request is pending, and a plan to relocate the tigers has not been filed by the owners, so we are taking the necessary steps to permanently protect these animals."

DEP is finalizing plans for the relocation. State wildlife officials, working with the Texas organization, will take every precaution to ensure that the relocation is carried out with the utmost respect and consideration for the safety of the animals and the attending staff. Trained staff and veterinarians will accompany the tigers throughout the relocation process.

###

EDITORS NOTE: In recognition of the high level of interest in this case, DEP is committed to keeping the public and news media informed of the status of the tigers and the facility. We are developing plans to address the needs of the media while ensuring the safety of the animals and on-site personnel during the relocation. However, if this enforcement action is appealed, actual relocation may still be six months to a year away.

Related Links

News Releases: DEP News Home | Archives
Department: NJDEP Home | About DEP | Index by Topic | Programs/Units | DEP Online
Statewide: NJ Home | Services A to Z | Departments/Agencies | FAQs

Copyright © State of New Jersey, 1996-2012

Last Updated: July 14, 2010