New Jersey Department of Education

Sample Scenario: Review discipline referral data and processes

Data/Needs Analysis:

A local education agency (LEA) is concerned that discipline referrals are up across its schools, including at the elementary level. Additionally, The LEA decides to analyze the disciplinary data and process to understand why referrals are up and how this can be mitigated.  They notice that students of color, particularly boys, tend to receive more conduct referrals and suspensions than any other student subgroup.

Example Data and Stakeholder-Driven Continuous Improvement Questions:

  • What does the disciplinary data show? Are there any student groups that are overrepresented in the conduct referrals (by gender, ethnic group, economic level, others student groups identified in N.J.A.C. 6A:7) and at what school level (i.e., elementary, middle, or high school)? What is the nature of the conduct referrals (i.e., fights, vaping, talking back to teachers, etc.)? What are the consequences? Does the analysis demonstrate that students from different groups receive different consequences for the same infraction?
    • Are there particular times or settings that are especially problematic (i.e., lunch/recess, gym class, transition times)?
    • Are the findings from the data analysis aligned to years past, or is this a new issue?
  • What strategies are currently implemented to promote satisfactory behavior in schools? Are the strategies effective? Do the strategies align to what the LEA has identified as the cause for the increasing conduct referrals?
    • Is the LEA and school staff prepared to abandon old strategies found to be ineffective and embrace new strategies better aligned to the identified issue?
  • What are some solutions that may address the conduct issues?
    • Is there a need for additional staff with expertise in behavior management?
    • Would the school benefit from implementing positive behavioral interventions and supports?
    • Are the consequences imposed now discouraging students from engaging in misbehavior in the future?
    • Are there programs or trainings available to help students build particular skills, such as teambuilding or respect?
    • Are educators trained in the techniques endorsed by the LEA and school for classroom management and supporting positive school climate and culture?
    • Are administrators trained to effectively coach educators on improving classroom management?
    • Are there trainings for teachers to help them prevent or deescalate volatile situations?
    • How could parents support the school in these efforts? Is there information or workshops that might be helpful for families?
    • How can students be more involved in finding solutions? If different electives or activities were available, could that help keep students more engaged in school and less likely to act out?
  • What outside help might the LEA need or want to engage to help with these issues?
  • How can this effort be included in the LEA’s comprehensive equity plan, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:7-1.4(c)?

The LEA recognizes that it has a growing problem around disciplinary referrals and decides to analyze the data and identify possible solutions.

Available Federal Funds:

The LEA may consider spending the funds below to identify and address the disproportional impact of its disciplinary referrals on students.

ESSER

IDEA

Title I-A

Title II-A

Title III-A

Other

Very few restrictions on how funds can be spent

Can be used for costs related to students with disabilities

Can be used for costs related to curriculum, materials and supplies

Can be used for costs related to professional development for teachers and paraprofessionals

Can be used for costs related to supporting English Learners

Varies

 

Sample Scenario: Braiding Breakdown:

An LEA plans to review and revise its disciplinary process. The total cost of the effort will be $250,000 (Table 1), which the LEA covers, first, through ESSER funds (Table 2), and later, after ESSER ends, through various funding streams (Table 3).

Table 1: Estimated costs of [activity]

Review Components

Estimated costs

Personnel (teacher/staff stipends to review/meet to analyze data, in teams by school level)

$20,000

Cost for outside consultants/training for school staff and parents

$50,000

Additional staff, such as mental health counselors, at different grade levels

$175,000

Other

$5,000

Total

$250,000

 

Table 2: Funding allocation in 2023 and 2024

 Grant

Estimated percent of students served

Percent of Total costs covered

Total Dollars Allocated

ESSER

100%

100%

$250,000

Total

 

100%

$250,000

 

Table 3: Braiding of fund allocations for 2025 and beyond, based on the estimated percentage of students in LEA*

Grant

Estimated percent of students in LEA

Percent of Total costs covered

Total Dollars Allocated

IDEA

15%

15%

$37,500

Title I-A

20%

20%

$50,000

Title II-A

N/A

30%

$75,000

Title III

10%

10%

$25,000

Other

55%

25%

$62,500

Total

 

100%

$250,000

*Numbers are for representative purposes only. Percentages could vary depending on different activities at different grade levels or if focused on different subgroups of students.

Page Last Updated: 01/12/2023

Back
to top