New Jersey Department of Education

Title III and Title III Immigrant Federal Funding

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) passed in December 2015 replaced the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2002 and reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. Despite some key changes in the law, the purpose remains the same: to ensure all students have equitable access to high-quality educational resources and opportunities to prepare all students to attain graduation success and be fully prepared to succeed in college, career, and civic participation.

The guidance in this document details the allowable uses of Title III and Title III Immigrant Federal funds. The term English learner (EL) is used by the United States Department of Education; while Multilingual Learners (MLs) is used by the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE). The two terms are interchangeable. The term ML will be used in this document to reference students eligible to receive services paid for by Title III and Title III Immigrant funding. This guidance document is intended to help Local Education Agencies (LEAs) better understand how to identify and serve MLs and immigrant students using Federal funds.

Funding Multilingual Learner-Related Activities Now Under Title I

Under ESSA, several provisions regarding MLs moved from Title III to Title I. LEAS may continue to use Title III funds for these activities as long as:

  • The use of funds is consistent with the purpose of Title III and are “reasonable and necessary costs;”
  • The use of funds is supplemental to the LEA’s civil rights obligations to MLs under Title VI and the EEOA; and
  • The LEA can demonstrate it is also using Title III funds to conduct activities required under Title III.

Examples of such activities include:

  • Notification to parents of MLs regarding Language Instruction Educational Programs (LIEPs) and related information (ESEA Section 1112(e)(3)); and
  • Parental participation (ESEA Section 1116(f)).

Title III Immigrant Funding

Title III Immigrant is a targeted subgrant the NJDOE awards to LEAs experiencing a significant increase (2% or more) in immigrant students, both public and nonpublic, over the average of the last two years. Any student who is identified as an immigrant must be reported as such on the NJSMART State Submission collection. The amount of Title III Immigrant funding an LEA receives is based on the eligible number of immigrants taken from the fall NJSmart data collection. In addition, immigrant students attending a nonpublic school in the geographic area served by the LEA are included in the total count. Nonpublic schools may report immigrant students on the Nonpublic Enrollment Report. This amount of Title III Immigrant funding for a district is calculated as follows:

Immigrant counts from all eligible LEAs are added together to get a statewide eligible immigrant count. The overall statewide allocation is divided by the total number of eligible students. The per-pupil amount is then multiplied by the eligible district’s immigrant count (public and non-public) to obtain an allocation amount for the LEA.

Note: An LEA must have 20 or more immigrant students, either public or nonpublic, and meet the eligibility test to qualify for Title III Immigrant funding.

Students identified as immigrant students are eligible to be served with Title III Immigrant funding. The Federal definition of an immigrant student is:

  • A student not born in any state (defined as 50 states + D.C. and Puerto Rico);
  • In a U.S. school for less than 3 cumulative years; and
  • Age 3-21

The ESSA Supplement Not Supplant Requirement

Title III is subject to a strict “supplement not supplant” (SNS) requirement that affects how Title III and Title III immigrant funds are spent. SNS requires both Title III and Title III Immigrant funds to add to (supplement) and not replace (supplant) other Federal, state, and local funds. An LEA may use program funds only to supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the level of funds that would, in the absence of the Federal funds, be made available from non-Federal sources. (2 CFR 200, Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement).

According to the compliance supplement, Except as noted below, in the following instances, it is presumed that supplanting has occurred:

  1. The LEA used Federal funds to provide services that the LEA was required to make available under other Federal, State or local laws.
  2. The LEA used Federal funds to provide services that the LEA provided with non-Federal funds in the prior year.

If the LEA can demonstrate that it would not have provided the services in question with non-Federal funds had the Federal funds not been available, then the use of the funds would not be considered supplanting. (2 CFR 200, Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement).

The question of whether funds are “supplemental” may depend on the type of program an LEA is required to implement under N.J.A.C. 6A:15. In other words, the same activity may be allowable in one situation and supplemental in another situation. For example, an LEA that has less than 10 students is required to provide English language services (ELS) to its MLs. This LEA wants to use Title III monies to provide Sheltered English Instruction (SEI) Professional Development (PD) for teachers working with MLs. This activity is allowable because its teachers are not required to be SEI trained, thus the activity is supplemental. However, an LEA that has more than 20 MLs in one language must implement a bilingual program. This LEA requests and receives approval for a bilingual program waiver to implement an alternative instructional program; the LEA chooses SEI. In this scenario, this LEA may not use Title III monies to provide SEI PD training to its teachers because SEI is the required state program type. In this instance, using Title III monies for SEI PD is supplanting.


Back
to top